Cricket fred
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Stuttering to defeat - actually nudged in front now, but Buttler and Stokes gone too. Pretty meek.
Woakes is useful but ..
Woakes is useful but ..
-
- Posts: 5928
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Cricket fred
You werent far out. That was a wretched collapse. Normal service was resumed after a decent 3rd day.Puja wrote:Let's see whether we can avoid losing by an innings first. It's still well within our gift to lose 8 wickets for <30 runs.fivepointer wrote:Good effort from Malan and Root but we're still 58 runs behind. Going to take a big effort batting all or most of the day to give us a winning chance.
Puja
-
- Posts: 19347
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
FFSPuja wrote:Let's see whether we can avoid losing by an innings first. It's still well within our gift to lose 8 wickets for <30 runs.fivepointer wrote:Good effort from Malan and Root but we're still 58 runs behind. Going to take a big effort batting all or most of the day to give us a winning chance.
Puja



- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14580
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Cricket fred
I was up at 4.30am due to a terrible cough and I still had the ‘joy’ of waking up to an ashes batting collapse.Mellsblue wrote:I’d forgotten the ‘joy’ of waking up to an ashes batting collapse.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Round 2 in Adelaide -
Oz lose Hazlewood & Cummins, Eng bring in Anderson & Broad.
to complete a useful albeit 1-dimensional attack, Need a few quick wickets to steal the advantage now.
Oz lose Hazlewood & Cummins, Eng bring in Anderson & Broad.
to complete a useful albeit 1-dimensional attack, Need a few quick wickets to steal the advantage now.
-
- Posts: 19347
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
not going so well. Picked a side to bowl under lights, which aren't on yetGalfon wrote:Round 2 in Adelaide -
Oz lose Hazlewood & Cummins, Eng bring in Anderson & Broad.
to complete a useful albeit 1-dimensional attack, Need a few quick wickets to steal the advantage now.

-
- Posts: 5608
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Yeah the attack is really missing one of the three really quick bowlers, but only one is on tour and being managed, and a quality spinner that England just don't have.Galfon wrote:Round 2 in Adelaide -
Oz lose Hazlewood & Cummins, Eng bring in Anderson & Broad.
to complete a useful albeit 1-dimensional attack, Need a few quick wickets to steal the advantage now.
I am not getting off the Liam Livingstone for the test team in the future bandwagon, especially if his bowling continues to improve.
-
- Posts: 19347
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
He's a huge talent- if you are investing so much in the likes of Buttler, then agreed he's worth a dart....but not sure who you'd drop, unless can find a convincing 3.Big D wrote:Yeah the attack is really missing one of the three really quick bowlers, but only one is on tour and being managed, and a quality spinner that England just don't have.Galfon wrote:Round 2 in Adelaide -
Oz lose Hazlewood & Cummins, Eng bring in Anderson & Broad.
to complete a useful albeit 1-dimensional attack, Need a few quick wickets to steal the advantage now.
I am not getting off the Liam Livingstone for the test team in the future bandwagon, especially if his bowling continues to improve.
-
- Posts: 5608
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Cricket fred
If the batting doesn't improve you could almost drop any of them.Banquo wrote:He's a huge talent- if you are investing so much in the likes of Buttler, then agreed he's worth a dart....but not sure who you'd drop, unless can find a convincing 3.Big D wrote:Yeah the attack is really missing one of the three really quick bowlers, but only one is on tour and being managed, and a quality spinner that England just don't have.Galfon wrote:Round 2 in Adelaide -
Oz lose Hazlewood & Cummins, Eng bring in Anderson & Broad.
to complete a useful albeit 1-dimensional attack, Need a few quick wickets to steal the advantage now.
I am not getting off the Liam Livingstone for the test team in the future bandwagon, especially if his bowling continues to improve.
It is unlikely Livingstone would fit into the line up but he'd be fun to watch.
-
- Posts: 19347
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
True. And Buttler has dropped Labuscagne twice...unforgiveable. Poor Jimmy especially.Big D wrote:If the batting doesn't improve you could almost drop any of them.Banquo wrote:He's a huge talent- if you are investing so much in the likes of Buttler, then agreed he's worth a dart....but not sure who you'd drop, unless can find a convincing 3.Big D wrote:
Yeah the attack is really missing one of the three really quick bowlers, but only one is on tour and being managed, and a quality spinner that England just don't have.
I am not getting off the Liam Livingstone for the test team in the future bandwagon, especially if his bowling continues to improve.
It is unlikely Livingstone would fit into the line up but he'd be fun to watch.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
From an aesthetic point of view I am disappointed Oz were 1 short of 222-2 going into D2, but you can't say Eng's cunning pink-nightie plan has delivered much thus far.
-
- Posts: 19347
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
50% improvement if buttler doesn't drop a sitter!Galfon wrote:From an aesthetic point of view I am disappointed Oz were 1 short of 222-2 going into D2, but you can't say Eng's cunning pink-nightie plan has delivered much thus far.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
awful drop - must be the lights.Banquo wrote: 50% improvement if buttler doesn't drop a sitter!

-
- Posts: 19347
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
long hot day etc etc....but,,Galfon wrote:awful drop - must be the lights.Banquo wrote: 50% improvement if buttler doesn't drop a sitter!
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Better by Eng. but not quite good enough. This one drifting away.
-
- Posts: 19347
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
yep....have we dropped anyone again?Galfon wrote:Better by Eng. but not quite good enough. This one drifting away.
-
- Posts: 19347
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
woakes and stokes getting tonked again
-
- Posts: 19347
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
ugly watch this. We are not 'in a good place' 

- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Woakes can be a choccy teapot on dry tracks like this - not new that.Burns gets eaten for breakfast by Starc again - one down.Banquo wrote:woakes and stokes getting tonked again
He will have fond memories of this tour.

-
- Posts: 19347
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
wonder why woakes was picked ahead of wood on this track tbh- his record abroad isn't good.Galfon wrote:Woakes can be a choccy teapot on dry tracks like this - not new that.Burns gets eaten for breakfast by Starc again - one down.Banquo wrote:woakes and stokes getting tonked again
He will have fond memories of this tour.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
ffs - 'this Test cricket is a piece of cake..' (A Ozman). 2 gone aleady.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Losing 4 for under 20 runs since lunch in these conditions is not good; 100 or so to avoid the follow on unlikely unless Sto-akes get a rush of blood..
5 of the top 7 failed to get double figures.
5 of the top 7 failed to get double figures.

-
- Posts: 5928
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Cricket fred
On a good wicket with Oz missing their best 2 bowlers.
This England side has all the resilience of a wet cardboard box.
This England side has all the resilience of a wet cardboard box.
-
- Posts: 19347
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
a few look like they don't want to be there. Buttler has had an utter stinker, and maybe its time to move on from him in red ball cricket.
Poor tactics and selection,lacking quality batsmen and drifting with our bowling. Fielding and attitude....no excuse.
Woakes gone- 203-7 . Unlikely to make many more with our tail, though Robinson will at least fight.
...or not. The pitch is a bit of a bunsen now, to add to the issues. Innings defeat I'd say.....
Poor tactics and selection,lacking quality batsmen and drifting with our bowling. Fielding and attitude....no excuse.
Woakes gone- 203-7 . Unlikely to make many more with our tail, though Robinson will at least fight.
...or not. The pitch is a bit of a bunsen now, to add to the issues. Innings defeat I'd say.....
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Sh!t or bust now for Stokes..shouldn't be long now either way
(new ball or nay). Oops.
Wonder if JR can still see his team getting on top.
(new ball or nay). Oops.
Wonder if JR can still see his team getting on top.