Margin of victory ends up being that awful, awful offside call in the first half.
That being said, belting game, and I'd have taken that after the Scotland match.
Ultimately that was two flawed sides, desperately trying to lead with their best shots, whilst hiding their glass jaws. I reckon if we'd have had CCS and any back other than Manu on the bench, we may have been able to shift the needle more in the last 10 minutes.
Probably too much to ask to actually see the TMO decision that decided the game. The one that nobody else saw and nobody knew the number of the player that committed the offence. Not like it was important or anything.
16th man wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 9:52 pm
Margin of victory ends up being that awful, awful offside call in the first half.
That being said, belting game, and I'd have taken that after the Scotland match.
Ultimately that was two flawed sides, desperately trying to lead with their best shots, whilst hiding their glass jaws. I reckon if we'd have had CCS and any back other than Manu on the bench, we may have been able to shift the needle more in the last 10 minutes.
Did Manu even touch the ball or make a tackle?
yes to both in fact broke tackle line in build up to freemans try.
Galfon wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 9:52 pm
Alot better than last time.
Discipline still a sore that won't go away it seems.
To be fair, there's a difference between some of those penalties under massive pressure, vs just the rank stupidity we've seen before.
Plus, two or three of them were rank decisions.
God we miss feyi waboso already even though he's only just begun... that feeling of having someone who can do something from nothing when the game opens up, someone rapid.
Penaud is just a constant worry, Feyi waboso might have felt like that for them.
I reckon that if we can get Earl, Mitchell, Ford, Lawrence, Slade in as an 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 selection then we could actually have a set, settled unit to build around, for the first time for a very long time.
Mr Mwenda wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 9:47 pm
No replay of the no arms offence?
With the French TV director, that almost certainly means it was a shit call.
ETA. Just gone back and rewatched and it's definitely a no-arms tackle. Nothing malicious in it, but very tired by Earl and it's a definite penalty.
Puja
Just seen it - on social media, cos god forbid they’d show a replay. Think it was incredibly marginal, especially for a TMO interjection and for a potential match deciding decision.
Galfon wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2024 9:52 pm
Alot better than last time.
Discipline still a sore that won't go away it seems.
To be fair, there's a difference between some of those penalties under massive pressure, vs just the rank stupidity we've seen before.
Plus, two or three of them were rank decisions.