Sarries vs Bath
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 3437
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Sarries vs Bath
Saracens Men team to play Bath Rugby:
1 Rhys Carre
2 Jamie George
3 Marco Riccioni
4 Maro Itoje (c)
5 Nick Isiekwe
6 Theo McFarland
7 Andy Onyeama-Christie
8 Tom Willis
9 Ivan van Zyl
10 Fergus Burke
11 Rotimi Segun
12 Nick Tompkins
13 Elliot Daly
14 Tobias Elliott
15 Alex Goode
Replacements:
16 Theo Dan
17 Eroni Mawi
18 Harvey Beaton
19 Hugh Tizard
20 Juan Martin Gonzalez
21 Ben Earl
22 Charlie Bracken
23 Lucio Cinti
Bath Rugby Starting XV: 1 Scott Kirk, 2 Jasper Spandler, 3 Archie Griffin, 4 Will Jeanes, 5 Ewan Richards ©, 6 Ethan Staddon, 7 Tom Cowan, 8 Arthur Green, 9 Louis Schreuder, 10 Orlando Bailey, 11 Ruaridh McConnochie, 12 Will Parry, 13 Louie Hennessey, 14 Austin Emens, 15 Jack Woods
Replacements: 16 Kepu Tuipulotu, 17 Arthur Cordwell, 18 Kieran Verden, 19 Mackenzie Graham, 20 George Timmins, 21 Neil le Roux, 22 Tyler Offiah, 23 John Stewart
1 Rhys Carre
2 Jamie George
3 Marco Riccioni
4 Maro Itoje (c)
5 Nick Isiekwe
6 Theo McFarland
7 Andy Onyeama-Christie
8 Tom Willis
9 Ivan van Zyl
10 Fergus Burke
11 Rotimi Segun
12 Nick Tompkins
13 Elliot Daly
14 Tobias Elliott
15 Alex Goode
Replacements:
16 Theo Dan
17 Eroni Mawi
18 Harvey Beaton
19 Hugh Tizard
20 Juan Martin Gonzalez
21 Ben Earl
22 Charlie Bracken
23 Lucio Cinti
Bath Rugby Starting XV: 1 Scott Kirk, 2 Jasper Spandler, 3 Archie Griffin, 4 Will Jeanes, 5 Ewan Richards ©, 6 Ethan Staddon, 7 Tom Cowan, 8 Arthur Green, 9 Louis Schreuder, 10 Orlando Bailey, 11 Ruaridh McConnochie, 12 Will Parry, 13 Louie Hennessey, 14 Austin Emens, 15 Jack Woods
Replacements: 16 Kepu Tuipulotu, 17 Arthur Cordwell, 18 Kieran Verden, 19 Mackenzie Graham, 20 George Timmins, 21 Neil le Roux, 22 Tyler Offiah, 23 John Stewart
-
- Posts: 19278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries vs Bath
this is getting stupid with Itoje. Madness- Bath have put their 2/3's out as well, which I get, but hardly good news for Glaws, Brizz, or Sale.
Tho Saints also putting their 2's out, season too long cos of RWC I suppose,plus squeezing PRC in.
Tho Saints also putting their 2's out, season too long cos of RWC I suppose,plus squeezing PRC in.
-
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm
Re: Sarries vs Bath
I get it, but it's a bit frustrating that Bath are almost ignoring this game. Definitely my anti Sarries bias saying this.
-
- Posts: 5924
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Sarries vs Bath
Bath's selection was predictable. A final appearance for some departing the club, a few fringe players and youngsters.
Makes Saracens job of getting 5 pts a whole lot easier.
Makes Saracens job of getting 5 pts a whole lot easier.
-
- Posts: 8524
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Sarries vs Bath
Bath in full playoff preparation mode. They've won two trophies already and now are building for a third. I'd have liked to see them go a touch stronger just for the benefit of the competition but it's understandable why they haven't.
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2021 9:35 pm
Re: Sarries vs Bath
Try on his league debut for Offiah
Next time he plays he'll be Captaining the Lions.
At the start of the season, I predicted a Bath v Saracens final so surprised Sarries haven't made it in the end. I'm sure McCall will get them back up there.

Well at least Itoje won't be playing in the Premiership semi or final.

At the start of the season, I predicted a Bath v Saracens final so surprised Sarries haven't made it in the end. I'm sure McCall will get them back up there.
-
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 5:32 pm
Re: Sarries vs Bath
Said it at the beginning of the season that this Sarries team was done.
McCall and his team have not moved forward with the game. A 9-10-12 of Van Zyl, Burke and Tompkins is just utterly dreadful.
McCall and his team have not moved forward with the game. A 9-10-12 of Van Zyl, Burke and Tompkins is just utterly dreadful.
-
- Posts: 8524
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Sarries vs Bath
It's a pretty average midfield isn't it. Made worse by the Sarries pack losing a lot of their carrying threat. The two Vunipolas weren't international quality anymore but in the Prem they were useful players to get over the gain line. Carre came in but he hasn't managed to stay fit all season. It's interesting that they've moved to bring in a Samoan LH and a Fijian that can play both sides for next season.Captainhaircut wrote: ↑Sat May 31, 2025 6:37 pm Said it at the beginning of the season that this Sarries team was done.
McCall and his team have not moved forward with the game. A 9-10-12 of Van Zyl, Burke and Tompkins is just utterly dreadful.
Some more forward momentum and then get Hartley and Spink fit (they've missed Lozowski as well) and they should start getting go forward. Once you are winning the gain line battle it's always easier. That being said the half backs have got to start putting Sarries in the right areas of the field. They don't have a side to play around the middle of the pitch, pressure and keep the game in the opponents third, The Iceman made a career out of keeping it simple and playing for territory.
-
- Posts: 19278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries vs Bath
yes, certainly 9-10Captainhaircut wrote: ↑Sat May 31, 2025 6:37 pm Said it at the beginning of the season that this Sarries team was done.
McCall and his team have not moved forward with the game. A 9-10-12 of Van Zyl, Burke and Tompkins is just utterly dreadful.
-
- Posts: 19278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries vs Bath
iceman generally had a mighty pack and mostly a decent tactical 9FKAS wrote: ↑Sat May 31, 2025 8:36 pmIt's a pretty average midfield isn't it. Made worse by the Sarries pack losing a lot of their carrying threat. The two Vunipolas weren't international quality anymore but in the Prem they were useful players to get over the gain line. Carre came in but he hasn't managed to stay fit all season. It's interesting that they've moved to bring in a Samoan LH and a Fijian that can play both sides for next season.Captainhaircut wrote: ↑Sat May 31, 2025 6:37 pm Said it at the beginning of the season that this Sarries team was done.
McCall and his team have not moved forward with the game. A 9-10-12 of Van Zyl, Burke and Tompkins is just utterly dreadful.
Some more forward momentum and then get Hartley and Spink fit (they've missed Lozowski as well) and they should start getting go forward. Once you are winning the gain line battle it's always easier. That being said the half backs have got to start putting Sarries in the right areas of the field. They don't have a side to play around the middle of the pitch, pressure and keep the game in the opponents third, The Iceman made a career out of keeping it simple and playing for territory.
-
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm
Re: Sarries vs Bath
Yeah I don't see if or how Farrell fixes this. Pointless bringing him back imo, and if he gets more international caps I'll be livid.Banquo wrote: ↑Sat May 31, 2025 10:25 pmiceman generally had a mighty pack and mostly a decent tactical 9FKAS wrote: ↑Sat May 31, 2025 8:36 pmIt's a pretty average midfield isn't it. Made worse by the Sarries pack losing a lot of their carrying threat. The two Vunipolas weren't international quality anymore but in the Prem they were useful players to get over the gain line. Carre came in but he hasn't managed to stay fit all season. It's interesting that they've moved to bring in a Samoan LH and a Fijian that can play both sides for next season.Captainhaircut wrote: ↑Sat May 31, 2025 6:37 pm Said it at the beginning of the season that this Sarries team was done.
McCall and his team have not moved forward with the game. A 9-10-12 of Van Zyl, Burke and Tompkins is just utterly dreadful.
Some more forward momentum and then get Hartley and Spink fit (they've missed Lozowski as well) and they should start getting go forward. Once you are winning the gain line battle it's always easier. That being said the half backs have got to start putting Sarries in the right areas of the field. They don't have a side to play around the middle of the pitch, pressure and keep the game in the opponents third, The Iceman made a career out of keeping it simple and playing for territory.
-
- Posts: 8524
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Sarries vs Bath
Oh aye, Fazlet isn't going to be a silver bullet to the Sarries problem. As I said bigging up the pack physicality will help. Burke just needs to start playing smart and to actually take control of the game. I'd have said Lozowski to 10 but he's going to be out for a long time.Danno wrote: ↑Sat May 31, 2025 11:52 pmYeah I don't see if or how Farrell fixes this. Pointless bringing him back imo, and if he gets more international caps I'll be livid.Banquo wrote: ↑Sat May 31, 2025 10:25 pmiceman generally had a mighty pack and mostly a decent tactical 9FKAS wrote: ↑Sat May 31, 2025 8:36 pm
It's a pretty average midfield isn't it. Made worse by the Sarries pack losing a lot of their carrying threat. The two Vunipolas weren't international quality anymore but in the Prem they were useful players to get over the gain line. Carre came in but he hasn't managed to stay fit all season. It's interesting that they've moved to bring in a Samoan LH and a Fijian that can play both sides for next season.
Some more forward momentum and then get Hartley and Spink fit (they've missed Lozowski as well) and they should start getting go forward. Once you are winning the gain line battle it's always easier. That being said the half backs have got to start putting Sarries in the right areas of the field. They don't have a side to play around the middle of the pitch, pressure and keep the game in the opponents third, The Iceman made a career out of keeping it simple and playing for territory.
-
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 5:32 pm
Re: Sarries vs Bath
Let’s not forget they were pretty poor last year when Farrell was there.
Sorrell going may lead to a change in plan in attack which is long overdue.
Sorrell going may lead to a change in plan in attack which is long overdue.
-
- Posts: 19278
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sarries vs Bath
Basically van zyl or whoever they currently have at 9 are pony. Plus they haven’t replaced top players or got the pre cheaty depth.Captainhaircut wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 9:22 am Let’s not forget they were pretty poor last year when Farrell was there.
Sorrell going may lead to a change in plan in attack which is long overdue.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9322
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Sarries vs Bath
A bit more of a challenge than thrown away.
36-24, TBP for Bath.
Plenty of full bore teams have done worse at a motivated Sarries
36-24, TBP for Bath.
Plenty of full bore teams have done worse at a motivated Sarries