Snap General Election called

[Sandydragon]

Best case scenario at this point is May's lead increases to less than 30 seats and she'd not be able to wholly ignore the pro-European element of the PCP

Actually the best case scenario is that she gets a stonking majority so she can ignore the right wing of her party and go with her instincts which are (hopefully) nowhere near as mental. It seems to me that she's currently following what logic there is to the Brexit decision because the braying mentalists can call her a traitor and get rid if she doesn't. On the orbs hand if she wins the sort of majority that they haven't seen in 3 decades and will have some actual room for negotiation.

Agreed. If the Labour Party could be trusted to elect a semi decent leader following the election then even a smaller majority might not matter so much. But in lieu of that, she needs to be able to ignore the right of her party which will otherwise call the shots to a large degree.

Recent polls notwithstanding, she will still increase her majority by a fair whack. Any issue caused by the manifesto, which has been very honest on stating that not all pensioners need the same help, will be blown over by polling day and I very much expect this to be zmay vs a Corbyn in the last fortnight.

In fact reading about the IRA story today regarding Corbyn and Abbot, it's obviously to see where this is going and some Tory strategists won't be too upset by the narrowing of the polls as it will focus attentions hopefully turn out the voters.

[Eugene Wrayburn]

Turn out is vital this election. The Tories need narrow polls to turn out the ukippers and the leave vote. Labour need the New Labour voters to hold their noses and vote Corbyn and for enough other parties to lend their votes to make it competitive

[kk67]

Also I think Labour have run a pretty effective campaign right out of the Lynton Crosbie/GOP playbook: identify a "them" that you are against, then say that only you can nullify "them" and promise literally anything that you can for those who are not "them" in the full knowledge that you won't do half of it.

That is true of every political party in the entire world. What's your point..?.

[Digby]

May was being quizzed by Andrew Neil this evening, he did give a nudge or two but basically she refused to answer questions, and in fairness saying nothing does seem more than enough to take a win

[Mellsblue]

Unless you are willing to throw vast sums of money at everyone you are best keeping your mouth shut. We really do live at the lowest of political times. Sensationalism trumps (no pun intended) logic and sensible policy, it seems.

[Sandydragon]

Unless you are willing to throw vast sums of money at everyone you are best keeping your mouth shut. We really do live at the lowest of political times. Sensationalism trumps (no pun intended) logic and sensible policy, it seems.

This.

If you have no chance of winning then promise everyone, bar the rich, the world and you will pick up some votes along the way.

[Digby]

Neil had asked her to square her own statements that she needed to be in charge of Brexit as Corbyn was a weak negotiator and we couldn't fail in that 'do deal would mean dire circumstances' and also her statement that 'no deal is better than a bad deal' which she didn't even try to answer other than to say Labour wanted to borrow and she was more trustworthy, invited to then say what the dire circumstances might be she went with Labour want to borrow and she's more trustworthy

[Zhivago]

Neil had asked her to square her own statements that she needed to be in charge of Brexit as Corbyn was a weak negotiator and we couldn't fail in that 'do deal would mean dire circumstances' and also her statement that 'no deal is better than a bad deal' which she didn't even try to answer other than to say Labour wanted to borrow and she was more trustworthy, invited to then say what the dire circumstances might be she went with Labour want to borrow and she's more trustworthy

She's pitiful.

[Digby]

Neil had asked her to square her own statements that she needed to be in charge of Brexit as Corbyn was a weak negotiator and we couldn't fail in that 'do deal would mean dire circumstances' and also her statement that 'no deal is better than a bad deal' which she didn't even try to answer other than to say Labour wanted to borrow and she was more trustworthy, invited to then say what the dire circumstances might be she went with Labour want to borrow and she's more trustworthy

She's pitiful.

And still good enough to easily beat the IRA supporting Corbyn

[Sandydragon]

Neil had asked her to square her own statements that she needed to be in charge of Brexit as Corbyn was a weak negotiator and we couldn't fail in that 'do deal would mean dire circumstances' and also her statement that 'no deal is better than a bad deal' which she didn't even try to answer other than to say Labour wanted to borrow and she was more trustworthy, invited to then say what the dire circumstances might be she went with Labour want to borrow and she's more trustworthy

She's pitiful.

And still good enough to easily beat the IRA supporting Corbyn

In the current circumstances, I bet most labour MPs are dreading what words will come out of Dear Leaders mouth next.

[Which Tyler]

[Zhivago]

She's pitiful.

And still good enough to easily beat the IRA supporting Corbyn

In the current circumstances, I bet most labour MPs are dreading what words will come out of Dear Leaders mouth next.

I don't think so. Labour are at the same level Labour were in 2005.Higher than ed

[Stones of granite]

And still good enough to easily beat the IRA supporting Corbyn

In the current circumstances, I bet most labour MPs are dreading what words will come out of Dear Leaders mouth next.

I don't think so. Labour are at the same level Labour were in 2005.Higher than ed

So, we're believing the polls now?

[Zhivago]

In the current circumstances, I bet most labour MPs are dreading what words will come out of Dear Leaders mouth next.

I don't think so. Labour are at the same level Labour were in 2005.Higher than ed

So, we're believing the polls now?

They are biased to Tories, doesn't mean I can't compare Labour present to Labour past.

[Stones of granite]

I don't think so. Labour are at the same level Labour were in 2005.Higher than ed

So, we're believing the polls now?

They are biased to Tories, doesn't mean I can't compare Labour present to Labour past.

You've made that assertion before without any evidence, so let's see how it stacks up historically.
2005 General Election
Polls leading up to the election show a Labour lead ranging from 2% to 14%. Result, Labour win by 3%, so polls wrongly favoured Labour.

2017_05_24_13_34_17_Opinion_polling_for_the_United_Kingdom_general_election_2005_Wikipedia.jpg

2010 General Election
Polls leading up to the election show a Conservative lead ranging from 1% to 10%, with most in the range 5% to 9%. Result, Conservatives win by 7.2%, so polls fairly close to the mark.

2017_05_24_13_34_58_Opinion_polling_for_the_United_Kingdom_general_election_2010_Wikipedia.jpg

2015 General Election
Polls leading up to the election show a Conservative lead/lag varying from -3% to +6% with most falling in the range -1% to +2%. Result Conservatives win by 6.6%, so polls strongly favoured Labour.

2017_05_24_13_36_00_Opinion_polling_for_the_United_Kingdom_general_election_2015_Wikipedia.jpg

[Sandydragon]

And still good enough to easily beat the IRA supporting Corbyn

In the current circumstances, I bet most labour MPs are dreading what words will come out of Dear Leaders mouth next.

I don't think so. Labour are at the same level Labour were in 2005.Higher than ed

Really? After a few days of Coryn and Abbots IRA links under the spotlight, do you think that his perceived support for terrorist groups in the past isn't going to dominate the next set of interviews?

[Sandydragon]

I don't think so. Labour are at the same level Labour were in 2005.Higher than ed

So, we're believing the polls now?

They are biased to Tories, doesn't mean I can't compare Labour present to Labour past.

In 2015 they were biased to Labour. And I use the term bias loosely as I don't think that there is a deliberate bias in the pollsters.

[Stones of granite]

So, we're believing the polls now?

They are biased to Tories, doesn't mean I can't compare Labour present to Labour past.

In 2015 they were biased to Labour. And I use the term bias loosely as I don't think that there is a deliberate bias in the pollsters.

and in 2005.

You're right. It's not a deliberate bias. It's poor methodology.

[Sandydragon]

They are biased to Tories, doesn't mean I can't compare Labour present to Labour past.

In 2015 they were biased to Labour. And I use the term bias loosely as I don't think that there is a deliberate bias in the pollsters.

and in 2005.

You're right. It's not a deliberate bias. It's poor methodology.

Partly. And some people don't like to admit that they are voting Tory.

[kk67]

Partly. And some people don't like to admit that they are voting Tory.

This always makes me giggle. It just raises so many questions.

[Mellsblue]

Partly. And some people don't like to admit that they are voting Tory.

This always makes me giggle. It just raises so many questions.

Probably as they have to deal with self-righteous idiots like you - a person who brought politics on to a thread about the bombing in Manchester. People who've lost such a grip on reality that they think all Conservative voters are heartless, right wing bastards. People who think it's perfectly OK to (cleverly?) call people cunt because it rhymes with their surname. People who think it's ok to throw bricks through office windows. I've had to deal with it myself - all Conservatives are heartless bastards - and it ain't fun. However, it is quite fun sitting down with those who will listen, explaining your position, explaining your volunteer work, your fundraising work and your charitable giving, and them realising that just because you believe that privitisation in some sectors is good and that continually throwing money at problems won't solve said problems that actually you aren't a bastard at all.

[kk67]

I know not all Torys are nasty. I was serious about it raising a lot of questions. You've made my point rather well.

[Mellsblue]

I know not all Torys are nasty. I was serious about it raising a lot of questions. You've made my point rather well.

That you're a self-righteous idiot

[kk67]

I know not all Torys are nasty. I was serious about it raising a lot of questions. You've made my point rather well.

That you're a self-righteous idiot

If you like, Doris. I've removed the offending rhyme.

[Zhivago]

In the current circumstances, I bet most labour MPs are dreading what words will come out of Dear Leaders mouth next.

I don't think so. Labour are at the same level Labour were in 2005.Higher than ed

Really? After a few days of Coryn and Abbots IRA links under the spotlight, do you think that his perceived support for terrorist groups in the past isn't going to dominate the next set of interviews?

You mean like the Sun's headline the morning after the bombing in Manchester? People have heard it all before. They have more pressing issues like not having their grave robbed by the Tories.