v AB'S - Second Test

Moderators: Puja, Misc Forum Mod

Post Reply
User avatar
oldbackrow
Posts: 409
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:46 pm
Location: Darkest Rotherham
Contact:

Re: v AB'S - Second Test

Post by oldbackrow »

Mikey Brown wrote: Believe me, as a Scotland fan, I am sorry too. You have watched England's first choice number 9 though, right? I think he's about the only top level scrumhalf who is less consistent than Laidlaw.
I hope you're not talking about Ben "Right lets have a think about this, I'll run, no I'll pass instead!" Youngs? :shock:
He was a bit better though in the 6N's. And when you watch videos of when he first played much quicker and no "3 steps and away"!
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 16981
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: v AB'S - Second Test

Post by Puja »

oldbackrow wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote: Believe me, as a Scotland fan, I am sorry too. You have watched England's first choice number 9 though, right? I think he's about the only top level scrumhalf who is less consistent than Laidlaw.
I hope you're not talking about Ben "Right lets have a think about this, I'll run, no I'll pass instead!" Youngs? :shock:
He was a bit better though in the 6N's. And when you watch videos of when he first played much quicker and no "3 steps and away"!
In fairness to Youngs, the threat he offers around the fringes keeps the defence worried enough that he can usually get away with inconsistent passing. Laidlaw does nothing to take the fringe defence's minds off crunching the ribs of the receiver.

Puja
Backist Monk
Mikey Brown
Posts: 11657
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: v AB'S - Second Test

Post by Mikey Brown »

That's a very generous way of putting it, but I've now lost track of why I was about to start slagging off Ben Youngs for the 1000th time on the Lions/AB thread.
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2434
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: v AB'S - Second Test

Post by Numbers »

Mikey Brown wrote:That's a very generous way of putting it, but I've now lost track of why I was about to start slagging off Ben Youngs for the 1000th time on the Lions/AB thread.
When he isn't even in the touring party..
Mikey Brown
Posts: 11657
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: v AB'S - Second Test

Post by Mikey Brown »

Don't worry Numbers, I've remembered now.
User avatar
Buggaluggs
Posts: 1260
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm

Re: v AB'S - Second Test

Post by Buggaluggs »

cashead wrote:
Buggaluggs wrote:You really are insignificant, aren't you?

Great come back, by the way, you fucking loser
It took you two goes to post this tripe?

Edit: And three days to come up with this response? A bit on the slow side, are we?
no
edit: I mean yes
edit: no, I mean no
Digby
Posts: 15261
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: v AB'S - Second Test

Post by Digby »

Why are the Lions happy to both kick away turnover ball and happy to play in their own 22?
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 15514
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: v AB'S - Second Test

Post by Mellsblue »

Digby wrote:Why are the Lions happy to both kick away turnover ball and happy to play in their own 22?
If only they had a weeks worth of hindsight ;)
Digby
Posts: 15261
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: v AB'S - Second Test

Post by Digby »

Mellsblue wrote:
Digby wrote:Why are the Lions happy to both kick away turnover ball and happy to play in their own 22?
If only they had a weeks worth of hindsight ;)
The wrong action at the wrong time
Timbo
Posts: 2435
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: v AB'S - Second Test

Post by Timbo »

Digby wrote:Why are the Lions happy to both kick away turnover ball and happy to play in their own 22?
Turnover ball often the best time to kick.
Digby
Posts: 15261
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: v AB'S - Second Test

Post by Digby »

Timbo wrote:
Digby wrote:Why are the Lions happy to both kick away turnover ball and happy to play in their own 22?
Turnover ball often the best time to kick.
This might be true, but given it's also likely the best time to run I don't really care about it being a good time to kick
Banquo
Posts: 19649
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: v AB'S - Second Test

Post by Banquo »

Digby wrote:
Timbo wrote:
Digby wrote:Why are the Lions happy to both kick away turnover ball and happy to play in their own 22?
Turnover ball often the best time to kick.
This might be true, but given it's also likely the best time to run I don't really care about it being a good time to kick
aye
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 15514
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: v AB'S - Second Test

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:
Timbo wrote:
Turnover ball often the best time to kick.
This might be true, but given it's also likely the best time to run I don't really care about it being a good time to kick
aye
It's best to read the game and make a decision given the given situation. I couldn't care less whether they kick it or run it as long as it's the correct decision at that given moment.

All that said, I'd rather 'run it' was the default setting rather than kick it.
Digby
Posts: 15261
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: v AB'S - Second Test

Post by Digby »

unless you cock up in spectacular style, and based on today that might include allowing the iceman to pass a ball, you should always have a chance to kick even after a run

if a defence manages to scramble in defence to close down a run and provide backfield coverage all whilst transitioning from attack to defence then fair play
Ross. S
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:59 pm
Location: Rhondda

Re: v AB'S - Second Test

Post by Ross. S »

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/40544586

Certain parties seem to have stfu about foxy lately
Post Reply