For you?
No.
Puja
Moderator: Puja
My thing with Smith is that the way we played for the first 20 minutes was perfectly setup for him. And then we just didn't continue in the same vein and his influence dropped until he was replaced for the anti-rugby version of George Ford.Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 3:15 pmShambolic just struck me as ott, and Smith is still highlights real and force it himself imo- hasn’t worked out his role yet. Bit like Earl actually. Curry remains what he always was as a player, but a tad less mobile.Oakboy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 12:23 pmDid you think Marcus got sufficient decent ball? Our only turnover (I think) was Itoje's near the end - cancelled out by Earl's stupid no-arms tackle penalty. I though Earl and Curry were ineffective. Both might be of test quality at their best but Earl is on a downward spiral of form and Curry is not the player he was. Maybe they will be the answer against SA on the back of denting a weak Australia side tomorrow but I doubt it.
Better for TV.
Such a weird ruling.
Thankfully the right decision, but wyf was the TMO even looking for?
TNT comms saying there’s been a change in the laws.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 3:34 pmThankfully the right decision, but wyf was the TMO even looking for?
"His right arm is holding the ball against his body all the way down, but we just need to see if his left hand leaves the ball for a fraction of a second" - so bloody what?
lol. So predictable and so wrong.FKAS wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 3:48 pm Furbank blitzes in and doesn't take the ball for the second game in a row. He wasn't the only one stepping in but in that wide channel you have to take man and ball if you step in for a two man tackle or you trust your inside man to make the tackle and back off to close the channel to the support.
Hopefully TCurry is ok. That didn't look good.
So Furbank does step in and not stop the ball from going wide?Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 3:53 pmlol. So predictable and so wrong.FKAS wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 3:48 pm Furbank blitzes in and doesn't take the ball for the second game in a row. He wasn't the only one stepping in but in that wide channel you have to take man and ball if you step in for a two man tackle or you trust your inside man to make the tackle and back off to close the channel to the support.
Hopefully TCurry is ok. That didn't look good.
I'm watching Stan Sports with a VPN - they were surprised TMO was even looking at it (but hoped for an overrule anyway)
Nope, but it’s not a one man sport. Healey analysed it spot on other than saying it was a 3 on 3 when it was actually 4 on 3.FKAS wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 3:54 pmSo Furbank does step in and not stop the ball from going wide?Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 3:53 pmlol. So predictable and so wrong.FKAS wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 3:48 pm Furbank blitzes in and doesn't take the ball for the second game in a row. He wasn't the only one stepping in but in that wide channel you have to take man and ball if you step in for a two man tackle or you trust your inside man to make the tackle and back off to close the channel to the support.
Hopefully TCurry is ok. That didn't look good.