Re: Ireland v All Blacks I: Sweet Home Away from Home, Chicago
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 10:09 pm
Just hope Ireland can keep the Raeburn Shield long enough for it to be for grabs in the 6N
The RugbyRebels Messageboard
http://www.rugbyrebels.co.uk/
As nice as a record like that is for us imagine being an AB having to deal with the pressure of losing that record hanging over you a couple of minutes before kickoff. There will be less pressure next time for these blokes which isn't a bad thing.Spy wrote:Terrific game. Great comeback from NZ, but Ireland just held on when it looked like they might crumble, then finished in style. Better team on the day, well deserved.
Fuck. Sad to see a record like that go.
Quite the opposite IMO. Hansen has now twice tried to re-think the wings by playing Savea and Naholo together, and it's failed twice. They just need to stick with the established dual fullback model.dk4 wrote:They almost got it few years ago, so they deserve it.
They defended very well, run their plays well. Thought are forwards were not pushing them back in the tackle in thenfirst half.
How.come out lineout improved in the end? Was it Barrett?
Do they need to rethink the wings? Do we need a grafter?
There is something in this. Ireland fully deserved the win, and I'm not trying to take anything away from their historic victory, but I think NZ went in over-confident and complacent as we often do when we've been on a good run. The team selection was over-confident, and the starting attitude was poor. Margins are fine in top-level sport, as I've always said, and the AB's winning by 15 in one match doesn't mean they're not far off losing by 5 in another. This is a kick in the pants, which is good for the All Blacks (and their fans) to experience every so often.cashead wrote:
Mind you, a good team needs these kinds of bitter experiences once in a while to learn from, and Kieran Read'll hopefully be better for this in the same way the 2007 quarterfinal turned out to be the best thing to ever happen to McCaw as a captain.
Spy wrote:There is something in this. Ireland fully deserved the win, and I'm not trying to take anything away from their historic victory, but I think NZ went in over-confident and complacent as we often do when we've been on a good run. The team selection was over-confident, and the starting attitude was poor. Margins are fine in top-level sport, as I've always said, and the AB's winning by 15 in one match doesn't mean they're not far off losing by 5 in another. This is a kick in the pants, which is good for the All Blacks (and their fans) to experience every so often.cashead wrote:
Mind you, a good team needs these kinds of bitter experiences once in a while to learn from, and Kieran Read'll hopefully be better for this in the same way the 2007 quarterfinal turned out to be the best thing to ever happen to McCaw as a captain.
tier 2?canta_brian wrote:So after 18 in a row against tier 1 teams are we going to throw it away against a tier 2 side?
cashead wrote:morepork wrote:Spy wrote:
He was getting some key turnovers and he was being his usual grindy self, but I don't think you can really pin it entirely on him when there are 7 others that were struggling to get involved in the rucks.
Agreed. Poor WUM.hellovating wrote:tier 2?canta_brian wrote:So after 18 in a row against tier 1 teams are we going to throw it away against a tier 2 side?
For sure. But there is a bit of clarity for future casual selection policy, no?cashead wrote:He was getting some key turnovers and he was being his usual grindy self, but I don't think you can really pin it entirely on him when there are 7 others that were struggling to get involved in the rucks.morepork wrote:Spy wrote:
There is something in this. Ireland fully deserved the win, and I'm not trying to take anything away from their historic victory, but I think NZ went in over-confident and complacent as we often do when we've been on a good run. The team selection was over-confident, and the starting attitude was poor. Margins are fine in top-level sport, as I've always said, and the AB's winning by 15 in one match doesn't mean they're not far off losing by 5 in another. This is a kick in the pants, which is good for the All Blacks (and their fans) to experience every so often.
What do you think about Sam Cane in this game? We got nailed at the breakdown over the entire game. The rent-a-lock situation didn't help but Ireland are traditionally strong at the breakdown. I thought Ardie was a big improvement.
He's a shoo-in now when Hansen goes now, surely.Len wrote:So Schmidt, fancy a job bro?
I don't have any particular insights into Cane. I think he was forced to play pretty tight in the first half as part of a generally struggling pack, and Savea came on at a stage in the game that suited his style. I didn't think Savea really grabbed his chance to nail a starting spot earlier this year when Cane was injured.morepork wrote:Spy wrote:There is something in this. Ireland fully deserved the win, and I'm not trying to take anything away from their historic victory, but I think NZ went in over-confident and complacent as we often do when we've been on a good run. The team selection was over-confident, and the starting attitude was poor. Margins are fine in top-level sport, as I've always said, and the AB's winning by 15 in one match doesn't mean they're not far off losing by 5 in another. This is a kick in the pants, which is good for the All Blacks (and their fans) to experience every so often.cashead wrote:
Mind you, a good team needs these kinds of bitter experiences once in a while to learn from, and Kieran Read'll hopefully be better for this in the same way the 2007 quarterfinal turned out to be the best thing to ever happen to McCaw as a captain.
What do you think about Sam Cane in this game? We got nailed at the breakdown over the entire game. The rent-a-lock situation didn't help but Ireland are traditionally strong at the breakdown. I thought Ardie was a big improvement.
Thanks. I was just looking at that. I think this might be the 3rd biggest score against them, coming after that result and 99 (not 91, obviously). Neither Australia nor England have ever scored 40 against New Zealand.cashead wrote:Springboks in 2000, who scored 46 (in a 46-40 win at Ellis Park) which is the highest score ever registered against the All Blacks.rowan wrote:This 40 points must rank up there with the highest scores the All Blacks have ever conceded too. I can only think of France (43) at the 1991 RWC being higher.
rowan wrote:Thanks. I was just looking at that. I think this might be the 3rd biggest score against them, coming after that result and 91. Neither Australia nor England have ever scored 40 against New Zealand.cashead wrote:Springboks in 2000, who scored 46 (in a 46-40 win at Ellis Park) which is the highest score ever registered against the All Blacks.rowan wrote:This 40 points must rank up there with the highest scores the All Blacks have ever conceded too. I can only think of France (43) at the 1991 RWC being higher.
Anyway, this is a great day for rugby folks. Well done, Ireland!
charles piutau, if ye had any sense.cashead wrote:Moala's apparently got a broken arm, and Crotty's hamstring is fucked. It would be interesting to see who'll be called in now for the midfield.
Obviously the front-line midfield will become Fekitoa and Lienert-Brown (probably ALB at 12 and Fekitoa at 13), but at least one guy will need to be called up. They're going to be a bit thin at 12.
So from what I can see, the options are:
Jordie Barrett - upgraded to a full squad member.
Rieko Ioane - moved in a spot, with Fekitoa used as a 12, which has happened in the past.
Lima Sopoaga - he's on the tour anyway, and has experience at 12.
Tim Bateman - he's in town for the Maori All Blacks, and he'd be eligible via the Luke McAlister Clause
Seta Tamanivalu - he's played for the All Blacks earlier this year, so he'd be familiar with the environment and the plays
certainly is eligible under world rugby regs.cashead wrote:Piutau is not eligible, and won't be unless he finishes his Ulster contract early and signs with the NZRU (plus one of the provinces).hellovating wrote:charles piutau, if ye had any sense.
don't do that shit. people do that shit when they lose against ye all the time. it's crap then and now.cashead wrote:
There were also times where the Irish got away with a fair bit from the ref
What hellov said.hellovating wrote:don't do that shit. people do that shit when they lose against ye all the time. it's crap then and now.cashead wrote:
There were also times where the Irish got away with a fair bit from the ref
What about this guy. Excuse me while I indulge in a little schadenfreude.jared_7 wrote:I saw in the NZ Herald, a guy had put $100k on the ABs to go through the season unbeaten, but amazingly he was only going to get $150k back?!
Even with the dominance of the ABs, a return of $1.50 over 14 games is terrible odds. In fact, they equate to about $1.03 return for each game they played this year. What odds do the ABs normally get in game in the 4N? Surely against the Wallabies and SA the odds must stretch to $1.10-$1.15?!