Re: Cicket fred
Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2019 12:35 pm
fair enough, bizarre he wasn't picked, when Ward was.
This. Can’t we find a bot that just posts this in the middle of every session? Would make life easierBanquo wrote:FFS
was this when he was having 'marital strife'?Banquo wrote:fair enough, bizarre he wasn't picked, when Ward was.
Yep, one down would have been our session. 2 makes it about level pegging.Banquo wrote:you'd normally settle for 76-2 when being put in. But losing Root makes it much worse.
nicely jinxedGalfon wrote:You can't have a collapse without something there in the first place - 85-2 gives the team something to work on. Go Burnley!
Buttler gets off the mark with 5.Banquo wrote:nicely jinxedGalfon wrote:You can't have a collapse without something there in the first place - 85-2 gives the team something to work on. Go Burnley!
doing a great job talking them out today. Bye Ben.Galfon wrote:A couple more quick wickets and we can say job-done..
Just not fair for Boyc's digestive system is this.
Bayliss will be gone soon, that'll help.Banquo wrote:doing a great job talking them out today. Bye Ben.Galfon wrote:A couple more quick wickets and we can say job-done..
Just not fair for Boyc's digestive system is this.
Terrible batting- genuinely can't see how we sort this out, its a mental collapse imo
You keep saying this, but see earlier comments about quality of batsmen available.Stom wrote:Bayliss will be gone soon, that'll help.Banquo wrote:doing a great job talking them out today. Bye Ben.Galfon wrote:A couple more quick wickets and we can say job-done..
Just not fair for Boyc's digestive system is this.
Terrible batting- genuinely can't see how we sort this out, its a mental collapse imo
yep.Galfon wrote:Broakes usually shows resolve, but there is chance here for some redemption for keeper/batsman#1..
They are only averaging 30 ish in CC, but so was Trescothick when picked! Burns was picked when scoring heavily in fairness too, and Denly is a red baller by trade.Big D wrote:Hopefully Bairstow clicks and digs in here. Big knock could kickstart a stalling career.
Get the guys in who have scored in CC1. Sibley for certain and maybe Northeast. At least they have scores in red ball cricket.
Too easy to say these guys aren't good enough. Especially when the incumbents aren't performing. Was fortunate enough to be in hospitality at the rained off game at old trafford on Friday and was chatting to guys in there and most thought Sibley deserves a crack based on this seasons form.
But Sibley particularly is averaging 60odd this season approaching 1000 runs to get his overall average to 40. Not sure another season of averaging 50plus would make too much of a difference. With tours of SA and NZ on the horizon I think they are as well giving him a run now and giving him time to bed I'm rather than having Denly wander on for a few more games.Banquo wrote:They are only averaging 30 ish in CC, but so was Trescothick when picked! Burns was picked when scoring heavily in fairness too, and Denly is a red baller by trade.Big D wrote:Hopefully Bairstow clicks and digs in here. Big knock could kickstart a stalling career.
Get the guys in who have scored in CC1. Sibley for certain and maybe Northeast. At least they have scores in red ball cricket.
Too easy to say these guys aren't good enough. Especially when the incumbents aren't performing. Was fortunate enough to be in hospitality at the rained off game at old trafford on Friday and was chatting to guys in there and most thought Sibley deserves a crack based on this seasons form.
Have to say though, for all the rants about get the red ball batsmen in.....there have been a huge number tried, too many with not enough time maybe, over the last 4 or 5 years.
I'm not arguing about Sibley to be clear (hence the tres point). But the general notion that we don't try and put form CC red ball players in doesn't stack up, and in fact you are replacing anotherBig D wrote:But Sibley particularly is averaging 60odd this season approaching 1000 runs to get his overall average to 40. Not sure another season of averaging 50plus would make too much of a difference. With tours of SA and NZ on the horizon I think they are as well giving him a run now and giving him time to bed I'm rather than having Denly wander on for a few more games.Banquo wrote:They are only averaging 30 ish in CC, but so was Trescothick when picked! Burns was picked when scoring heavily in fairness too, and Denly is a red baller by trade.Big D wrote:Hopefully Bairstow clicks and digs in here. Big knock could kickstart a stalling career.
Get the guys in who have scored in CC1. Sibley for certain and maybe Northeast. At least they have scores in red ball cricket.
Too easy to say these guys aren't good enough. Especially when the incumbents aren't performing. Was fortunate enough to be in hospitality at the rained off game at old trafford on Friday and was chatting to guys in there and most thought Sibley deserves a crack based on this seasons form.
Have to say though, for all the rants about get the red ball batsmen in.....there have been a huge number tried, too many with not enough time maybe, over the last 4 or 5 years.
At 23, he is the perfect age to get in at 4 in place of Denly with a view to moving up (or open from the start). If it doesnt work there is time to go away and work on issues and come back if need be. Don't think England would be losing anything by making that change bar Denlys slow bowling.