v Blues

Moderators: Puja, Misc Forum Mod

Post Reply
J Dory
Posts: 988
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:54 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by J Dory »

fivepointer
Posts: 5925
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by fivepointer »

Pretty underwhelming. Too many mistakes, dull penalties, poor options and some players really looking off the pace. Its game 2, they've been in NZ a week. I wouldn't get too worried as there is obviously the capacity in the squad to play a whole lot better, but the turnaround needs to happen pretty sharpish.
onlynameleft
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:23 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by onlynameleft »

I watched the first two games in the Sports Plaza at Center Parcs. Was kinda thinking of staying here for a few weeks but to be honest can't see the Lions getting close to that simple heads up support play and accurate offloading for West's try so think we will head home Friday.
QwentyJ
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 7:30 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by QwentyJ »

hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
MrK wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Well done Blues!

If Gatland could send Seymour and Hogg over to the Scotland camp that would be just great.

Can they send Laidlaw too then.
Nah, I'll pass. Most Scots don't even want him in the 23 which says all you need to know about Gatland as a selector.
Fucks sake Greig, come on.

I would love to have Laidlaw in the Scottish 23. Maybe not the starting 9 at the moment on form but his playing days are not over yet.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5846
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: v Blues

Post by Stom »

Puja wrote:Why are people not going Warburton at 6 and Tipuric at 7? Seems like the obvious call to me.

Puja
POWER!

No, seriously. I'd love to see a pure power carrying, ruck hitting pack, backed up with quick backs.
jared_7
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:47 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by jared_7 »

So what do people reckon it is - really poor Lions or the standard of NZ Super rugby sides being high? Probably a bit of both?

Austin Healey has said Saracens would win by 30 against this Blues side, and the Guardian said all the home nations, individually, would beat them (which I assume includes Scotland?)
User avatar
skidger
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am

Re: v Blues

Post by skidger »

I think we all knew anyway but this game confirmed Bristol have made a cracking signing. Although he will have to get past the mighty Jordan Crane first. Sorry Jord.
User avatar
skidger
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am

Re: v Blues

Post by skidger »

jared_7 wrote:So what do people reckon it is - really poor Lions or the standard of NZ Super rugby sides being high? Probably a bit of both?

Austin Healey has said Saracens would win by 30 against this Blues side, and the Guardian said all the home nations, individually, would beat them (which I assume includes Scotland?)
A bit of both. I think Saracens are far more likely to win by 3 points than 30 and that is Healey just being a prick as usual.
User avatar
Len
Posts: 608
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by Len »

Healey is a twat.
User avatar
Len
Posts: 608
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by Len »

I've always secretly thought Nowell was average, never voiced it because he has a bit of a fan club. I never thought he'd make the ABs squad if he were a kiwi. Now I'm not sure he'd make some of the NZ super rugby sides benches. Itoje needs to STFU at the linout. First five a real concern for the Lions. No real playmaker there.

Hopefully the Crusaders can show up on Saturday.
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2308
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

jared_7 wrote:So what do people reckon it is - really poor Lions or the standard of NZ Super rugby sides being high? Probably a bit of both?

Austin Healey has said Saracens would win by 30 against this Blues side, and the Guardian said all the home nations, individually, would beat them (which I assume includes Scotland?)
It's Gatland. The Lions players are very good but playing to Gatland's formula is a how-to manual of losing to the kiwi franchises. They are more than used to power, and the defensive line is designed to reform at such a high speed that even when it bends it very rarely breaks. Even good kicks can be run back for tries or at least serious field position. I cannot see how a Gatland team wins any of these games without the kiwis seriously fucking up and apparently picking a 20 year old newbie for his first start against the most famous touring side in the world isn't a big enough cock up.

Eta, clearly the guardian didn't see Wales getting their arses handed to them by a depleted chiefs team. FFS.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1582
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by jngf »

Puja wrote:Why are people not going Warburton at 6 and Tipuric at 7? Seems like the obvious call to me.

Puja
Suspect it's because Warburton's arguably not as good or powerful a carrying 6 as Moriarty or Stander or for that matter Haskell.

Agree that Tipuric is the better 7 - I'd be happy with a 6 Moriarty/Stander 7 Tipuric 8 Faletau back row - but Gatland will stick with Warburton
Last edited by jngf on Wed Jun 07, 2017 10:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2308
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

jngf wrote:
Puja wrote:Why are people not going Warburton at 6 and Tipuric at 7? Seems like the obvious call to me.

Puja
Suspect it's because Warburton's arguably not as good or powerful a carrying 6 as Moriarty or Stander or for that matter Haskell.
He's absolutely bloody miles ahead of Haskell even in carrying as long as the criteria includes making something out of the carry.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 3812
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: v Blues

Post by Lizard »

All this talk of "carrying" by loose forwards shows how far behind the thinking is. The Blues has Luatua who's offloading (3 or 4 beauties) made a significant part of the difference between the teams. It's not the carrying, it's how you keep the ball alive after the carry.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
User avatar
skidger
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am

Re: v Blues

Post by skidger »

Did not see Saturdays game so not sure if there was a haka before that game but surprised to see one today. Surely that should just be for the National side? Please don't let there be one this Saturday as that would be just be utter bollocks.
zer0
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by zer0 »

skidger wrote:Did not see Saturdays game so not sure if there was a haka before that game but surprised to see one today. Surely that should just be for the National side? Please don't let there be one this Saturday as that would be just be utter bollocks.
Why?
User avatar
skidger
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am

Re: v Blues

Post by skidger »

Should the esteemed Adidas Haka not be just for the all Blacks? I admit it lost some sheen a few years back in Cardiff when they behaved like babies and did it in the dressing room. But how many 'welcomes' do the Lions need? I would rather you just got on with showing us up on the rugby field with superior skills and players not called Haskell without yet another haka. More is less.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14579
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: v Blues

Post by Mellsblue »

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:
jngf wrote:
Puja wrote:Why are people not going Warburton at 6 and Tipuric at 7? Seems like the obvious call to me.

Puja
Suspect it's because Warburton's arguably not as good or powerful a carrying 6 as Moriarty or Stander or for that matter Haskell.
He's absolutely bloody miles ahead of Haskell even in carrying as long as the criteria includes making something out of the carry.
I'm miles ahead of Haskell at carrying and I'm a long retired, homeless man's George Ford. He was absolutely woeful today in every aspect. Just as I expected him to be.
User avatar
ricardominyardo
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon May 22, 2017 11:44 pm
Location: auckland

Re: v Blues

Post by ricardominyardo »

Well that didnt go so well for the lions
Not sure they will win anything on this tour now
Cant see them toppling the crusaders.... and a second string lions will unlikely beat the highlanders ... chiefs ... or hurricanes ( even without ABs)
Their only chance will be against the Maori.... and thats looking 50/50 as well
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2308
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

ricardominyardo wrote:Well that didnt go so well for the lions
Not sure they will win anything on this tour now
Cant see them toppling the crusaders.... and a second string lions will unlikely beat the highlanders ... chiefs ... or hurricanes ( even without ABs)
Their only chance will be against the Maori.... and thats looking 50/50 as well
Ricardo?! Welcome back!

I agree completely by the way.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2308
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

skidger wrote:Should the esteemed Adidas Haka not be just for the all Blacks? I admit it lost some sheen a few years back in Cardiff when they behaved like babies and did it in the dressing room. But how many 'welcomes' do the Lions need? I would rather you just got on with showing us up on the rugby field with superior skills and players not called Haskell without yet another haka. More is less.
You completely misunderstand the place of a haka in NZ Rugby. Schools do hakas before their games.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
User avatar
Len
Posts: 608
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by Len »

cashead wrote:
skidger wrote:Should the esteemed Adidas Haka not be just for the all Blacks? I admit it lost some sheen a few years back in Cardiff when they behaved like babies and did it in the dressing room. But how many 'welcomes' do the Lions need? I would rather you just got on with showing us up on the rugby field with superior skills and players not called Haskell without yet another haka. More is less.
Thanks for explaining the Hakka for everyone, you ignorant fuck.
Their country is going through a bit of a racist patch at the moment mate, its fashionable. Quite why we should be sensitive about their terrorist attacks whilst they have a dig at our culture I'll never understand.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12212
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by Mikey Brown »

Wow. And you thought Skidger sounded like a moron just then?
bitts
Posts: 263
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:12 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by bitts »

Len wrote:
cashead wrote:
skidger wrote:Should the esteemed Adidas Haka not be just for the all Blacks? I admit it lost some sheen a few years back in Cardiff when they behaved like babies and did it in the dressing room. But how many 'welcomes' do the Lions need? I would rather you just got on with showing us up on the rugby field with superior skills and players not called Haskell without yet another haka. More is less.
Thanks for explaining the Hakka for everyone, you ignorant fuck.
Their country is going through a bit of a racist patch at the moment mate, its fashionable. Quite why we should be sensitive about their terrorist attacks whilst they have a dig at our culture I'll never understand.
Do you find it hard to be sensitive about what happened in Manchester/london?

We don't expect people to be sensitive about what happened because we think we're special. We expect it Because people are normally sensitive over the matter of people being killed. Especially kids.
User avatar
Len
Posts: 608
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm

Re: v Blues

Post by Len »

bitts wrote:
Len wrote:
cashead wrote: Thanks for explaining the Hakka for everyone, you ignorant fuck.
Their country is going through a bit of a racist patch at the moment mate, its fashionable. Quite why we should be sensitive about their terrorist attacks whilst they have a dig at our culture I'll never understand.
Do you find it hard to be sensitive about what happened in Manchester/london?

We don't expect people to be sensitive about what happened because we think we're special. We expect it Because people are normally sensitive over the matter of people being killed. Especially kids.
We don't expect people to respect the haka because we think we're special. We expect it because people are normally respectful of other cultures.
Post Reply