v Blues
Moderators: Puja, Misc Forum Mod
-
- Posts: 5925
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: v Blues
Pretty underwhelming. Too many mistakes, dull penalties, poor options and some players really looking off the pace. Its game 2, they've been in NZ a week. I wouldn't get too worried as there is obviously the capacity in the squad to play a whole lot better, but the turnaround needs to happen pretty sharpish.
-
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:23 pm
Re: v Blues
I watched the first two games in the Sports Plaza at Center Parcs. Was kinda thinking of staying here for a few weeks but to be honest can't see the Lions getting close to that simple heads up support play and accurate offloading for West's try so think we will head home Friday.
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 7:30 pm
Re: v Blues
Fucks sake Greig, come on.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Nah, I'll pass. Most Scots don't even want him in the 23 which says all you need to know about Gatland as a selector.MrK wrote:hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Well done Blues!
If Gatland could send Seymour and Hogg over to the Scotland camp that would be just great.
Can they send Laidlaw too then.
I would love to have Laidlaw in the Scottish 23. Maybe not the starting 9 at the moment on form but his playing days are not over yet.
- Stom
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: v Blues
POWER!Puja wrote:Why are people not going Warburton at 6 and Tipuric at 7? Seems like the obvious call to me.
Puja
No, seriously. I'd love to see a pure power carrying, ruck hitting pack, backed up with quick backs.
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:47 pm
Re: v Blues
So what do people reckon it is - really poor Lions or the standard of NZ Super rugby sides being high? Probably a bit of both?
Austin Healey has said Saracens would win by 30 against this Blues side, and the Guardian said all the home nations, individually, would beat them (which I assume includes Scotland?)
Austin Healey has said Saracens would win by 30 against this Blues side, and the Guardian said all the home nations, individually, would beat them (which I assume includes Scotland?)
- skidger
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am
Re: v Blues
I think we all knew anyway but this game confirmed Bristol have made a cracking signing. Although he will have to get past the mighty Jordan Crane first. Sorry Jord.
- skidger
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am
Re: v Blues
A bit of both. I think Saracens are far more likely to win by 3 points than 30 and that is Healey just being a prick as usual.jared_7 wrote:So what do people reckon it is - really poor Lions or the standard of NZ Super rugby sides being high? Probably a bit of both?
Austin Healey has said Saracens would win by 30 against this Blues side, and the Guardian said all the home nations, individually, would beat them (which I assume includes Scotland?)
- Len
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm
Re: v Blues
I've always secretly thought Nowell was average, never voiced it because he has a bit of a fan club. I never thought he'd make the ABs squad if he were a kiwi. Now I'm not sure he'd make some of the NZ super rugby sides benches. Itoje needs to STFU at the linout. First five a real concern for the Lions. No real playmaker there.
Hopefully the Crusaders can show up on Saturday.
Hopefully the Crusaders can show up on Saturday.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: v Blues
It's Gatland. The Lions players are very good but playing to Gatland's formula is a how-to manual of losing to the kiwi franchises. They are more than used to power, and the defensive line is designed to reform at such a high speed that even when it bends it very rarely breaks. Even good kicks can be run back for tries or at least serious field position. I cannot see how a Gatland team wins any of these games without the kiwis seriously fucking up and apparently picking a 20 year old newbie for his first start against the most famous touring side in the world isn't a big enough cock up.jared_7 wrote:So what do people reckon it is - really poor Lions or the standard of NZ Super rugby sides being high? Probably a bit of both?
Austin Healey has said Saracens would win by 30 against this Blues side, and the Guardian said all the home nations, individually, would beat them (which I assume includes Scotland?)
Eta, clearly the guardian didn't see Wales getting their arses handed to them by a depleted chiefs team. FFS.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- jngf
- Posts: 1582
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
Re: v Blues
Suspect it's because Warburton's arguably not as good or powerful a carrying 6 as Moriarty or Stander or for that matter Haskell.Puja wrote:Why are people not going Warburton at 6 and Tipuric at 7? Seems like the obvious call to me.
Puja
Agree that Tipuric is the better 7 - I'd be happy with a 6 Moriarty/Stander 7 Tipuric 8 Faletau back row - but Gatland will stick with Warburton
Last edited by jngf on Wed Jun 07, 2017 10:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: v Blues
He's absolutely bloody miles ahead of Haskell even in carrying as long as the criteria includes making something out of the carry.jngf wrote:Suspect it's because Warburton's arguably not as good or powerful a carrying 6 as Moriarty or Stander or for that matter Haskell.Puja wrote:Why are people not going Warburton at 6 and Tipuric at 7? Seems like the obvious call to me.
Puja
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Lizard
- Posts: 3812
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: v Blues
All this talk of "carrying" by loose forwards shows how far behind the thinking is. The Blues has Luatua who's offloading (3 or 4 beauties) made a significant part of the difference between the teams. It's not the carrying, it's how you keep the ball alive after the carry.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
- skidger
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am
Re: v Blues
Did not see Saturdays game so not sure if there was a haka before that game but surprised to see one today. Surely that should just be for the National side? Please don't let there be one this Saturday as that would be just be utter bollocks.
-
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: v Blues
Why?skidger wrote:Did not see Saturdays game so not sure if there was a haka before that game but surprised to see one today. Surely that should just be for the National side? Please don't let there be one this Saturday as that would be just be utter bollocks.
- skidger
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am
Re: v Blues
Should the esteemed Adidas Haka not be just for the all Blacks? I admit it lost some sheen a few years back in Cardiff when they behaved like babies and did it in the dressing room. But how many 'welcomes' do the Lions need? I would rather you just got on with showing us up on the rugby field with superior skills and players not called Haskell without yet another haka. More is less.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14579
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: v Blues
I'm miles ahead of Haskell at carrying and I'm a long retired, homeless man's George Ford. He was absolutely woeful today in every aspect. Just as I expected him to be.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:He's absolutely bloody miles ahead of Haskell even in carrying as long as the criteria includes making something out of the carry.jngf wrote:Suspect it's because Warburton's arguably not as good or powerful a carrying 6 as Moriarty or Stander or for that matter Haskell.Puja wrote:Why are people not going Warburton at 6 and Tipuric at 7? Seems like the obvious call to me.
Puja
- ricardominyardo
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2017 11:44 pm
- Location: auckland
Re: v Blues
Well that didnt go so well for the lions
Not sure they will win anything on this tour now
Cant see them toppling the crusaders.... and a second string lions will unlikely beat the highlanders ... chiefs ... or hurricanes ( even without ABs)
Their only chance will be against the Maori.... and thats looking 50/50 as well
Not sure they will win anything on this tour now
Cant see them toppling the crusaders.... and a second string lions will unlikely beat the highlanders ... chiefs ... or hurricanes ( even without ABs)
Their only chance will be against the Maori.... and thats looking 50/50 as well
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: v Blues
Ricardo?! Welcome back!ricardominyardo wrote:Well that didnt go so well for the lions
Not sure they will win anything on this tour now
Cant see them toppling the crusaders.... and a second string lions will unlikely beat the highlanders ... chiefs ... or hurricanes ( even without ABs)
Their only chance will be against the Maori.... and thats looking 50/50 as well
I agree completely by the way.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: v Blues
You completely misunderstand the place of a haka in NZ Rugby. Schools do hakas before their games.skidger wrote:Should the esteemed Adidas Haka not be just for the all Blacks? I admit it lost some sheen a few years back in Cardiff when they behaved like babies and did it in the dressing room. But how many 'welcomes' do the Lions need? I would rather you just got on with showing us up on the rugby field with superior skills and players not called Haskell without yet another haka. More is less.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Len
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm
Re: v Blues
Their country is going through a bit of a racist patch at the moment mate, its fashionable. Quite why we should be sensitive about their terrorist attacks whilst they have a dig at our culture I'll never understand.cashead wrote:Thanks for explaining the Hakka for everyone, you ignorant fuck.skidger wrote:Should the esteemed Adidas Haka not be just for the all Blacks? I admit it lost some sheen a few years back in Cardiff when they behaved like babies and did it in the dressing room. But how many 'welcomes' do the Lions need? I would rather you just got on with showing us up on the rugby field with superior skills and players not called Haskell without yet another haka. More is less.
-
- Posts: 12212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: v Blues
Wow. And you thought Skidger sounded like a moron just then?
-
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:12 pm
Re: v Blues
Do you find it hard to be sensitive about what happened in Manchester/london?Len wrote:Their country is going through a bit of a racist patch at the moment mate, its fashionable. Quite why we should be sensitive about their terrorist attacks whilst they have a dig at our culture I'll never understand.cashead wrote:Thanks for explaining the Hakka for everyone, you ignorant fuck.skidger wrote:Should the esteemed Adidas Haka not be just for the all Blacks? I admit it lost some sheen a few years back in Cardiff when they behaved like babies and did it in the dressing room. But how many 'welcomes' do the Lions need? I would rather you just got on with showing us up on the rugby field with superior skills and players not called Haskell without yet another haka. More is less.
We don't expect people to be sensitive about what happened because we think we're special. We expect it Because people are normally sensitive over the matter of people being killed. Especially kids.
- Len
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm
Re: v Blues
We don't expect people to respect the haka because we think we're special. We expect it because people are normally respectful of other cultures.bitts wrote:Do you find it hard to be sensitive about what happened in Manchester/london?Len wrote:Their country is going through a bit of a racist patch at the moment mate, its fashionable. Quite why we should be sensitive about their terrorist attacks whilst they have a dig at our culture I'll never understand.cashead wrote: Thanks for explaining the Hakka for everyone, you ignorant fuck.
We don't expect people to be sensitive about what happened because we think we're special. We expect it Because people are normally sensitive over the matter of people being killed. Especially kids.