Page 80 of 161

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 11:07 am
by Digby
It had never occurred to me Philander was unplayable.

Thank god we didn't elect to bat last on this wicket

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 12:33 pm
by Galfon
3 gone in 8 balls - back on track. :cry:
YJ gets his timbers tumbled again..another chance for him goes begging.

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 12:50 pm
by Digby
Very giving of Bairstow not to give the selectors any issues if they wanted to pick a spinner

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 12:55 pm
by fivepointer
Poor shots from Root and Stokes. And a typical non shot from Bairstow who makes the bowlers job far too easy. Any kind of 1st innings lead seems unlikely at this stage.

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 3:07 pm
by Galfon
SA 158 lead with 7 wickets to play with..
It's another heady mix of Results wicket/ Eng. flakiness.

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 3:51 pm
by Digby
Plenty of soft dismissals from both sides in this match, that and the current state of the game after just 2 days leads me to conclude there'll be a winner in the opener, you heard it here first!

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 6:15 pm
by Banquo
Digby wrote:It had never occurred to me Philander was unplayable.

Thank god we didn't elect to bat last on this wicket
Philander is a fantastic bowler.

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 8:27 pm
by Galfon
Banquo wrote: Philander is a fantastic bowler.
Apart from his wickets to concede just a run/over from 15 on that track was tops (compare Archer)
To call his retirement from the national team at just 34 seems a bit previous.He's off to Zummerzet next year & covering his options :) .

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 10:24 pm
by Digby
Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:It had never occurred to me Philander was unplayable.

Thank god we didn't elect to bat last on this wicket
Philander is a fantastic bowler.
He's very good, just maybe not as good as we made him look

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 8:15 am
by Banquo
Digby wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:It had never occurred to me Philander was unplayable.

Thank god we didn't elect to bat last on this wicket
Philander is a fantastic bowler.
He's very good, just maybe not as good as we made him look
Sounds familiar, we’ve also made their batsmen look better than they are. He showed us the line and length, but we seem unable to learn; Archer needs some help I think.

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 8:50 am
by Digby
Archer just spent a week in bed being sick and was then asked to bowl first rather than rest another day, and do so in very hot weather when the pitch would only get worse. Though yes Archer needs some help, hopefully in the main with the workload

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 9:54 am
by Galfon
The lurgy is getting a grip on the team - Buttler & not well-looking Root affected today..
The Nortje-watchman grabs forty, and the weather's worsening.Happy days.

On a brighter note, Clive Lloyd gets his knighthood - very fine player but a great captain.
Well deserved - put alot back into the game too.

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 10:45 am
by Banquo
Digby wrote:Archer just spent a week in bed being sick and was then asked to bowl first rather than rest another day, and do so in very hot weather when the pitch would only get worse. Though yes Archer needs some help, hopefully in the main with the workload
I was referring also to his 'form' in NZ....

my we bowled badly this morning, suppose some lurgy mitigation..

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 10:45 am
by Banquo
Galfon wrote:The lurgy is getting a grip on the team - Buttler & not well-looking Root affected today..
The Nortje-watchman grabs forty, and the weather's worsening.Happy days.

On a brighter note, Clive Lloyd gets his knighthood - very fine player but a great captain.
Well deserved - put alot back into the game too.
....and one of the greatest cover points in the history of the game.

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 1:59 pm
by Galfon
wtf..??

(50 opening partnership)

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 4:08 pm
by Digby
Nobody saw that coming. If we can get some more runs before the next rolling of the roller wears off this might be a game yet

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 5:50 pm
by Galfon
A faint sniff - steady start essential.
Hopefully the illness in the camp doesn't spread (not literally) and complicate matters.

* Also i'd to point out this is the two-thousandth reply on this fred and as such could attract considerable value in the lurk export market, in a by-gone era.

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:36 am
by Galfon
Not the best start - Burns & Denley depart.
Eng. need a big innings from someone now..
still a whiff.

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 10:44 am
by Banquo
Galfon wrote:Not the best start - Burns & Denley depart.
Eng. need a big innings from someone now..
still a whiff.
Burns will be hanging his head a bit...

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 11:54 am
by Banquo
Have to worry about YJB. Think he needs some proper time off; he's corrected technical faults before.

Buttler needs to play his normal game imo.

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 1:32 pm
by Banquo
amazingly, we collapsed again; illness is a bit of a mitigation, but these collapses are too regular.

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 2:48 pm
by Galfon
Last 5 wkts. in 5 overs.. 129 for 9 wickets today when a win was a possibility... :|
The debilitating extent of the lurgy is an unknown, but this team seems to fold more readily than a napkin at the moment.

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 3:06 pm
by Digby
The good news is with just one qualification spot open for the utter abhorrence that is the world test championship bollocks we're exceedingly unlikely to make it.

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 10:05 am
by fivepointer
Think illness was a telling factor. Most of the team had bouts of illness before and during the game. It shouldnt be used as an excuse as England, yet again, came up short in too many areas. Opting to bowl first looked a gamble at the time and hindsight confirmed it was a poor decision.

Re: Cricket fred

Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 3:35 pm
by Digby
I'd accept the illness and attending lack of a spinner more as explanations for the bowling than the batting, and certainly than batting collapses. Especially when collapsing in both innings is what our batters do when in theory not ill, if anything they maintained standards admirably.

Ideally we'd make SA bowl another 70-80 overs at us in the next test, but we've got to manage another 50 odd unless SA have at least one miserable failure with their batting.