The Jaguars are 1 - 4 now, after winning their first game. A bit disappointing. They've been competitive in all their games, but now comes a couple of very tough games against the Canes and Saders in NZ, and I'd be surprised if they won either. After that they're off to Tokyo, where they ought to break their losing streak against the hapless Sunwolves.
Re: Blues Thread
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 11:14 pm
by Spy
Nice to get a win, but it was unattractive stuff. Dropped balls, wild passes, stupid aimless kicks. A lot of side-to-side, without much up-the-guts. Sharks coped with most of it pretty well, and swooped on our frequent mistakes. Clearly the worst team in the NZ conference.
Ranger out for the season with a torn ACL. He'd been working hard, but not wreaking the tackle-busting havoc he was creating before going to France. Nonetheless, he's a significant loss.
Re: Blues Thread
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 8:46 pm
by Lizard
An interesting thing to note about the Blues, is that they have played other NZ teams 4 times (for 1 win). The other NZ teams have played only 2 "derbies" each (each with a 1:1 record except the unbeaten Chiefs).
They might not be as bad we think.
Re: Blues Thread
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 2:26 am
by Lizard
The Blues in fact have an unbeaten record against foreign teams (2 wins - albeit close ones, 1 draw). This is better than all other NZ teams bar the Crusaders.
Re: Blues Thread
Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 4:52 pm
by Len
Lizard wrote:The Blues in fact have an unbeaten record against foreign teams (2 wins - albeit close ones, 1 draw). This is better than all other NZ teams bar the Crusaders.
Re: Blues Thread
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2016 8:32 pm
by Eugene Wrayburn
Spy wrote:Nice to get a win, but it was unattractive stuff. Dropped balls, wild passes, stupid aimless kicks. A lot of side-to-side, without much up-the-guts. Sharks coped with most of it pretty well, and swooped on our frequent mistakes. Clearly the worst team in the NZ conference.
Ranger out for the season with a torn ACL. He'd been working hard, but not wreaking the tackle-busting havoc he was creating before going to France. Nonetheless, he's a significant loss.
Aw ballix. He's been improving game on game for me. Love watching him play.
Blues look much imporved, if less than brilliant.
Re: Blues Thread
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 5:09 am
by Lizard
Piers Francis is a terrible name for a rugby player. Nearly as bad as Percival Montgomery.
Re: Blues Thread
Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 3:02 am
by Spy
The Blues attack looked really crisp against the Rebels. Much better catch-pass, and looked threatening every time we had the ball. Damned near gave it away, mind you.
The lads from Iron Maiden were sitting just behind us, in a room that usually seems to be used for coaching staff, or at least Blues insiders. Didn't know they were rugby fans. You could tell it was Iron Maiden, because not only was it actually Iron Maiden, but also half of them were wearing Iron Maiden T shirts.
Re: Blues Thread
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 7:21 pm
by morepork
Bloos 24-0 down 5 into the second half.
They can't buy points.
Re: Blues Thread
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 7:26 pm
by morepork
31-0.
Re: Blues Thread
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 8:30 pm
by Len
Anal prolapse
Re: Blues Thread
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 10:22 pm
by Len
cashead wrote:
Len wrote:Anal prolapse
Sorry to hear about your medical condition.
The Lions prolapsed the Blues anus.
Re: Blues Thread
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 11:23 pm
by Spy
I don't think I'll bother with watching the replay.
Re: Blues Thread
Posted: Sun May 15, 2016 2:55 am
by J Dory
I was frustrated that I couldn't find a stream. Now I'm not. Fuckity fuck fuck fuck. Fuck.
Re: Blues Thread
Posted: Sun May 15, 2016 5:16 am
by UGagain
J Dory wrote:I was frustrated that I couldn't find a stream. Now I'm not. Fuckity fuck fuck fuck. Fuck.
Re: Blues Thread
Posted: Sat May 21, 2016 1:27 am
by zer0
A good article from the Herald (!) on the challenges of contracting age grade players in Auckland.