Team for Scotland

Moderator: Sandydragon

francoisfou
Posts: 2485
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm
Location: Haute-Garonne

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by francoisfou »

Shame, cos loads of rugby people associate the name Stradey with the best of Welsh rugby.
normanski
Posts: 1298
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:26 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by normanski »

francoisfou wrote:Shame, cos loads of rugby people associate the name Stradey with the best of Welsh rugby.
Not this afternoon!
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10473
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Sandydragon »

This is dire. The weather ain’t helping but even so.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10473
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Sandydragon »

Well our defence is better than last week (not difficult) and our front five is more physical (not difficult). Otherwise this is a race to the bottom.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10473
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Sandydragon »

Totally clueless again with ball in hand.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10473
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Sandydragon »

Our discipline is dire.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10473
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Sandydragon »

That was fucking dire. Well done Scotland for driving a maul from that far out but seriously that was poor defence.
normanski
Posts: 1298
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:26 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by normanski »

We’re doing our best to lose this.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10473
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Sandydragon »

Scrum crap again.
normanski
Posts: 1298
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:26 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by normanski »

Sandydragon wrote:Scrum crap again.
With no sustained go forward we just can’t put pressure on the Scots.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10473
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Sandydragon »

That sums up our game. Totally clueless.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10473
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Sandydragon »

normanski wrote:
Sandydragon wrote:Scrum crap again.
With no sustained go forward we just can’t put pressure on the Scots.
I’m not sure we’re trying to get sustained go forward though. We go wide very early.
Wallpaperman
Posts: 822
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2020 5:21 pm
Location: Colchester

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Wallpaperman »

That was terrible. Well done Scotland, deserved win.
normanski
Posts: 1298
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:26 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by normanski »

Well done Scotland, you won the hard yards. Just wish we had a few tight forwards as good as yours.
Last edited by normanski on Sat Oct 31, 2020 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10473
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Sandydragon »

Well done Scotland for holding your nerve and winning.

Personally, I’m dreading Ireland next week. You can’t concede 16 penalties in a game. And can someone please explain our game plan to me?
User avatar
Donny osmond
Posts: 3214
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Donny osmond »

Hard lines lads, you were the better team for large parts of that game, not sure how we nicked it tbh.

Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 4990
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

The phrase fucking awful springs to mind.

Whenever we had the ball we kicked it away. Or dropped it. Jesus. What was the plan???

Well done Scotland. You were better than us, although I'm aware that that isn't saying much.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10473
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Sandydragon »

Donny osmond wrote:Hard lines lads, you were the better team for large parts of that game, not sure how we nicked it tbh.

Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
No we really weren’t. Better team overall win.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10473
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Sandydragon »

Son of Mathonwy wrote:The phrase fucking awful springs to mind.

Whenever we had the ball we kicked it away. Or dropped it. Jesus. What was the plan???

Well done Scotland. You were better than us, although I'm aware that that isn't saying much.
And where was the incisiveness when we had the ball? We did have spells of possession in decent parts of the field but we never looked like scoring anything. We must do better than this, we’ve never had a huge pack but have managed to get possession and look dangerous. Even with Gatlandball at its most extreme, we at least looked dangerous on occasion.

I’m again struggling to find much good to say about this, other than it was an improvement on last week but only just.
Wallpaperman
Posts: 822
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2020 5:21 pm
Location: Colchester

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Wallpaperman »

Several not straight lineouts, and Davies took ages to get the ball away from rucks. Wales blew some useful field position especially in the first half.

I fancied the centre combination today but they got no ball
Wallpaperman
Posts: 822
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2020 5:21 pm
Location: Colchester

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Wallpaperman »

Have to start Wyn Jones and Francis next week, the scrums have been too vulnerable. Would like to see a tight head who can scrummage on the bench, too
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10473
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Sandydragon »

Wallpaperman wrote:Have to start Wyn Jones and Francis next week, the scrums have been too vulnerable. Would like to see a tight head who can scrummage on the bench, too
Agreed. We also need ball carriers in the pack for the full 80. Cory Hill is a good player but not an impact player and I’m not a fan of Cubby.
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 4990
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

Sandydragon wrote:
Son of Mathonwy wrote:The phrase fucking awful springs to mind.

Whenever we had the ball we kicked it away. Or dropped it. Jesus. What was the plan???

Well done Scotland. You were better than us, although I'm aware that that isn't saying much.
And where was the incisiveness when we had the ball? We did have spells of possession in decent parts of the field but we never looked like scoring anything. We must do better than this, we’ve never had a huge pack but have managed to get possession and look dangerous. Even with Gatlandball at its most extreme, we at least looked dangerous on occasion.

I’m again struggling to find much good to say about this, other than it was an improvement on last week but only just.
Yes, yet again we don't seem to know what to do when we have the ball. Which seems bizarre knowing that this is mostly the coaching team that used to run the Scarlets ... is rugby at this level so different??

Considering the opposition I think we might actually have been worse than last week. So much for blowing out the cobwebs.
Wallpaperman
Posts: 822
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2020 5:21 pm
Location: Colchester

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Wallpaperman »

Sandydragon wrote:
Wallpaperman wrote:Have to start Wyn Jones and Francis next week, the scrums have been too vulnerable. Would like to see a tight head who can scrummage on the bench, too
Agreed. We also need ball carriers in the pack for the full 80. Cory Hill is a good player but not an impact player and I’m not a fan of Cubby.
Rowlands can carry. I thought he came into the game after dropping the ball early on, but the penalty he conceded isn’t eh Scottish 22 was crucial. I like Hill, but don’t think he is the answer at present.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10473
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Team for Scotland

Post by Sandydragon »

We desperately need to get over the gain line and generate momentum. I agree Rowlands gave us some go forward and should continue next week. I think I’d prefer Ball on the bench who also generates momentum.

We could do with Moriarty and Navidi back, although I think we have unearthed another good blindside today (one of the few positives).

In the back line it all looks so pedestrian. We have some moves off first phase but look confused after that. I don’t mind players making mistakes if they are trying to do something positive but I’m struggling to see much positivity at the moment. We certainly aren’t challenging defences (last weeks try aside) and Scotland looked comfortable today.

I can live with this being a dire Autumn if our game plan evolves and we look like we are building for the future. At the moment I can’t honestly say that I’m seeing much evidence of a game plan.
Post Reply