England - the third round

Moderator: Sandydragon

Post Reply
User avatar
Sourdust
Posts: 817
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:03 pm
Contact:

Re: England - the third round

Post by Sourdust »

Wallpaperman wrote:
I saw it from the overhead camera when I watched the match again. It looked forward from overhead.
Sorry I can't tell you where I saw it. I THINK it was an unused angle, but it might just have been slowed-down footage of what was broadcast.

The ball goes yards forward relative to the pitch, which was talked about as conclusive, but of course it's not. However the passer's (George?) hands move clearly forwards.The ball leaves his possession in the direction the tryline. It's not outrageous, but neither is there any doubt. Had the TMO been invoked there's no way the try could have stood. It's the kind of thing that used to get missed all the time before TMOs (understandably) and is still missed quite often (bafflingly), and I don't think we'd have been complaining much about it unless it had been a late winner. But in the context of the "Jammy Wales" narrative, we should be flagging it up. :-)
User avatar
oldbackrow
Posts: 281
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:46 pm
Location: Darkest Rotherham
Contact:

Re: England - the third round

Post by oldbackrow »

Sourdust wrote:
Wallpaperman wrote:
I saw it from the overhead camera when I watched the match again. It looked forward from overhead.
Sorry I can't tell you where I saw it. I THINK it was an unused angle, but it might just have been slowed-down footage of what was broadcast.

The ball goes yards forward relative to the pitch, which was talked about as conclusive, but of course it's not. However the passer's (George?) hands move clearly forwards.The ball leaves his possession in the direction the tryline. It's not outrageous, but neither is there any doubt. Had the TMO been invoked there's no way the try could have stood. It's the kind of thing that used to get missed all the time before TMOs (understandably) and is still missed quite often (bafflingly), and I don't think we'd have been complaining much about it unless it had been a late winner. But in the context of the "Jammy Wales" narrative, we should be flagging it up. :-)
Wallpaperman
Posts: 822
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2020 5:21 pm
Location: Colchester

Re: England - the third round

Post by Wallpaperman »

Merci beaucoup
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10473
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: England - the third round

Post by Sandydragon »

Fair play, the rest of that try build up and the finish was quality. Slightly iffy pass so that means we both have one iffy try each.
normanski
Posts: 1298
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:26 pm

Re: England - the third round

Post by normanski »

Sandydragon wrote:Fair play, the rest of that try build up and the finish was quality. Slightly iffy pass so that means we both have one iffy try each.
Well said!
User avatar
Sourdust
Posts: 817
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:03 pm
Contact:

Re: England - the third round

Post by Sourdust »

Sandydragon wrote:Fair play, the rest of that try build up and the finish was quality. Slightly iffy pass so that means we both have one iffy try each.
Exactly. Really well-worked try, with a dodgy finish. Shouldn't count but I'm not complaining - easy to be relaxed about these when you win, of course.

Similarly, Sanjay's try is on the end of one of the best attacks I've seen from Wales in a long time. Without "the incident" it would be in everyone's "Try of the 6N" reels. Check out the previous 60s to see what I mean.

(Trigger warning: May make uncomfortable viewing for "Biggar can't get our attack moving" exponents)
Post Reply