Re: America
Posted: Mon May 19, 2025 4:06 pm
The hope seems to be that Anorthosite could be a better raw material for the production of aluminium than bauxite ie that production could be cheaper and less wasteful. This has yet to be proved though.cashead wrote: ↑Fri May 23, 2025 5:55 am One of the reasons that Trump wants to drag Greenland into the US sphere of influence is because of Greenland's nature as a resource-rich chunk of land, with abundant oil, minerals and natural gas. One of those minerals is anorthosite, which is a potential green alternative to aluminium.
While Trump was busily issuing ultimatums and demanding Greenland become Americanised, Greenland went and signed a deal with Greenland Anorthosite Mining or GAM, a Danish-French company, which is backed by the Jean Boulle Group and both Danish and French state investment funds.
The Trump administration views Greenland as a commodity they can swipe from the Danes, and bully the world into compliance, while the rest of the world carries on behaving like adults. In other words, this is a masterclass in Trump demonstrating ThE ARt of tHE deAL.
Yes and the UK is also trying to cut numbers of foreign students as Starmer chases the far-right vote. Total genius.cashead wrote: ↑Sun May 25, 2025 12:30 amWell, you know who won't find out? The US. "'Murrica first!" Yes, at being stupid.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Fri May 23, 2025 10:48 amThe hope seems to be that Anorthosite could be a better raw material for the production of aluminium than bauxite ie that production could be cheaper and less wasteful. This has yet to be proved though.cashead wrote: ↑Fri May 23, 2025 5:55 am One of the reasons that Trump wants to drag Greenland into the US sphere of influence is because of Greenland's nature as a resource-rich chunk of land, with abundant oil, minerals and natural gas. One of those minerals is anorthosite, which is a potential green alternative to aluminium.
While Trump was busily issuing ultimatums and demanding Greenland become Americanised, Greenland went and signed a deal with Greenland Anorthosite Mining or GAM, a Danish-French company, which is backed by the Jean Boulle Group and both Danish and French state investment funds.
The Trump administration views Greenland as a commodity they can swipe from the Danes, and bully the world into compliance, while the rest of the world carries on behaving like adults. In other words, this is a masterclass in Trump demonstrating ThE ARt of tHE deAL.
https://www.arctictoday.com/can-greenla ... he-planet/
Partially because Trump wants to kick international university students out, while the EU is prepping to roll out the red carpet for them.
Took me a second but that’s pretty fucking good.
This is genuinely concerning. It feels like another test to see how far they can get before serious challenge.Puja wrote: ↑Sun Jun 08, 2025 8:23 am And while the Billionaire Breakup very publically happens, Trump (or, probably more likely, the office of the President) is deploying 2,000 National Guard to Los Angeles because of the protests against the ICE raids, despite them not being needed and the Governor actively denying permission to call the Guard up. He has overridden the Governor's authority by citing a law that allows him to federally deploy troops in the case of "a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States."
A protest against Trump's policies is being legally defined as a rebellion against the authority of the government of the US. Quite apart from how terrifying that is, I've no doubt that chief fascist Stephen Miller is using this as a test balloon for future declarations of martial law.
Puja
Already being threatened with federal charges for initially resisting the ICE actionSandydragon wrote: ↑Sun Jun 08, 2025 9:27 pmThis is genuinely concerning. It feels like another test to see how far they can get before serious challenge.Puja wrote: ↑Sun Jun 08, 2025 8:23 am And while the Billionaire Breakup very publically happens, Trump (or, probably more likely, the office of the President) is deploying 2,000 National Guard to Los Angeles because of the protests against the ICE raids, despite them not being needed and the Governor actively denying permission to call the Guard up. He has overridden the Governor's authority by citing a law that allows him to federally deploy troops in the case of "a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States."
A protest against Trump's policies is being legally defined as a rebellion against the authority of the government of the US. Quite apart from how terrifying that is, I've no doubt that chief fascist Stephen Miller is using this as a test balloon for future declarations of martial law.
Puja
Can the governor legally contest this?
This will of course play well with the Trump base who will see the Palestinian flags and assume the local authorities have lost control.Danno wrote: ↑Sun Jun 08, 2025 10:23 pmAlready being threatened with federal charges for initially resisting the ICE actionSandydragon wrote: ↑Sun Jun 08, 2025 9:27 pmThis is genuinely concerning. It feels like another test to see how far they can get before serious challenge.Puja wrote: ↑Sun Jun 08, 2025 8:23 am And while the Billionaire Breakup very publically happens, Trump (or, probably more likely, the office of the President) is deploying 2,000 National Guard to Los Angeles because of the protests against the ICE raids, despite them not being needed and the Governor actively denying permission to call the Guard up. He has overridden the Governor's authority by citing a law that allows him to federally deploy troops in the case of "a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States."
A protest against Trump's policies is being legally defined as a rebellion against the authority of the government of the US. Quite apart from how terrifying that is, I've no doubt that chief fascist Stephen Miller is using this as a test balloon for future declarations of martial law.
Puja
Can the governor legally contest this?
https://nypost.com/2025/06/08/us-news/g ... ice-raids/
Apparently Trump is now publicly backing the director of ICE over threats to arrest Newsom. My understanding is that the governor is on very solid legal and constitutional grounds, so that could be interesting.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Tue Jun 10, 2025 6:41 am Under cover of the LA "riots" (which I believe amounts to... 1 car set on fire... by LAPD); it looks like RFK Jr has fired everyone on the CDC's vaccine advisory panel - for conflict of interest (ie, for being informed scientists who disagree with an ideologue)
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250609-rfk-jr-ousts-entire-us-vaccine-panel-over-alleged-conflicts
The usual tactic is to act fast (preferably irreversibly), then see what kind of legal challenge arises.Sandydragon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 10, 2025 7:03 amApparently Trump is now publicly backing the director of ICE over threats to arrest Newsom. My understanding is that the governor is on very solid legal and constitutional grounds, so that could be interesting.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Tue Jun 10, 2025 6:41 am Under cover of the LA "riots" (which I believe amounts to... 1 car set on fire... by LAPD); it looks like RFK Jr has fired everyone on the CDC's vaccine advisory panel - for conflict of interest (ie, for being informed scientists who disagree with an ideologue)
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250609-rfk-jr-ousts-entire-us-vaccine-panel-over-alleged-conflicts
SCOTUS is going to be busy.
None of which will do Newsom any harm in the popularity stakes. This is an issue, states rights that is, which many on the right feel strongly about so potential here for the governor to be a rallying point for Democrats and anyone else who is anti Trump. This might become the effective opposition voice which has been missing since the election.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 10, 2025 10:53 amThe usual tactic is to act fast (preferably irreversibly), then see what kind of legal challenge arises.Sandydragon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 10, 2025 7:03 amApparently Trump is now publicly backing the director of ICE over threats to arrest Newsom. My understanding is that the governor is on very solid legal and constitutional grounds, so that could be interesting.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Tue Jun 10, 2025 6:41 am Under cover of the LA "riots" (which I believe amounts to... 1 car set on fire... by LAPD); it looks like RFK Jr has fired everyone on the CDC's vaccine advisory panel - for conflict of interest (ie, for being informed scientists who disagree with an ideologue)
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250609-rfk-jr-ousts-entire-us-vaccine-panel-over-alleged-conflicts
SCOTUS is going to be busy.
Hopefully they won't be so gung-ho with a state governor (they can't just lose him in a foreign jail) so the threats are coming first.