Cricket fred
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Shiver-me-timbers, Broad !..
Even Root embracing the let's-go mindset earlier.
Emphatic stuff (again).
Even Root embracing the let's-go mindset earlier.
Emphatic stuff (again).
-
- Posts: 19294
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
- Puja
- Posts: 17804
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Hadn't realised that these games were on BT - had assumed they were on Sky, which I do not have - and was pleasantly surprised to see an advert during the Prem rugby earlier in the day. This was my first chance to watch Bazball in anything other than highlights and it was fascinating. Brook still has glaring holes in his game and rides his luck a lot but, whereas previous regimes would've seen him make a scratchy 18 before the bowlers picked him apart, this made use of his strengths and made the bowlers scared about coming in to him. He probably lasted the same number of balls and got out the same way he would've done under the old regime (a duff fiddle outside his off stump that he would've been better leaving well alone), but the freedom to attack meant he belted a 50 and changed the complexion of the innings.
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 19294
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
The whole difference in this team is that they play to their strengths and stick with it even when its difficult. So far, so good!Puja wrote: ↑Sat Feb 18, 2023 9:36 am Hadn't realised that these games were on BT - had assumed they were on Sky, which I do not have - and was pleasantly surprised to see an advert during the Prem rugby earlier in the day. This was my first chance to watch Bazball in anything other than highlights and it was fascinating. Brook still has glaring holes in his game and rides his luck a lot but, whereas previous regimes would've seen him make a scratchy 18 before the bowlers picked him apart, this made use of his strengths and made the bowlers scared about coming in to him. He probably lasted the same number of balls and got out the same way he would've done under the old regime (a duff fiddle outside his off stump that he would've been better leaving well alone), but the freedom to attack meant he belted a 50 and changed the complexion of the innings.
Puja
On Brook, its only his 5th test I think, so untainted by previous regimes. It will however be interesting to see what occurs if he/they have to play in a tighter way.... big IF

- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14580
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Cricket fred
So simple yet so effective… and true in every part of life, imo.
Ol’ Hazza B is Mellsblue Jnrs’ favourite player after watching him in The Hundred. He’s been retained by Super Chargers along with Stokes. Let’s hope they get to see them - watched six of eight home games and yet to see Bez S.
- Puja
- Posts: 17804
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Ah, I more meant hypothetically what previous regimes would've done to him.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 19294
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
jimbo cleans up.
Can't argue with that.
(Oz also getting pasted again in Ind - not such a formidable bunch on their travels it seems..)

It gives England their first Test win in New Zealand for 15 years and a 10th win in 11 matches since Stokes took over as captain at the beginning of last summer. (beeb)
Can't argue with that.
(Oz also getting pasted again in Ind - not such a formidable bunch on their travels it seems..)
-
- Posts: 19294
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Great win and Anderson is phenomenal still.
Mitchell and Blundell again the only batters putting up resistance in this test, as they did in the summer
Mitchell and Blundell again the only batters putting up resistance in this test, as they did in the summer
-
- Posts: 19294
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Jimmy back to no1 in the world....amazing
-
- Posts: 19294
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Good to see Root get runs, and playing in his own style, which is fine when you lose three quick wickets! Harry Brook…wow
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Under the circumstances early on, to keep playing those shots in this format is absoloute top-drawer.
To have yer man at that level with JR at his stage in career, is a great thing for the team (and the game, tbf)
Must be something in the tea or maybe the rhubarb !

- Puja
- Posts: 17804
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Cricket fred
I don't see how we can persist with Crawley though. I do see why they have - he's definitely got something under there and they've done well out of trusting players and giving them time so far. However, I just don't see it coming out regularly enough.
Problem is that, while we'll have a log-jam of middle-order batsmen waiting for a space when Bairstow comes back, I don't rightly know who we'd bring in to open if we do ditch Crawley.
Puja
Problem is that, while we'll have a log-jam of middle-order batsmen waiting for a space when Bairstow comes back, I don't rightly know who we'd bring in to open if we do ditch Crawley.
Puja
Backist Monk
- Stom
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Cricket fred
Move everyone up one? Pope to open? Or just bring Bairstow in to open? Tough one.Puja wrote: ↑Fri Feb 24, 2023 10:46 am I don't see how we can persist with Crawley though. I do see why they have - he's definitely got something under there and they've done well out of trusting players and giving them time so far. However, I just don't see it coming out regularly enough.
Problem is that, while we'll have a log-jam of middle-order batsmen waiting for a space when Bairstow comes back, I don't rightly know who we'd bring in to open if we do ditch Crawley.
Puja
- Puja
- Posts: 17804
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Cricket fred
I'd be wary of disrupting what's working so well with our middle order right now. Baristow to open possibly, but he's not really got experience there in first class cricket and it's asking a lot of him to take on an entirely different role than the one which he was finally seeing sustained success in.Stom wrote: ↑Fri Feb 24, 2023 11:13 amMove everyone up one? Pope to open? Or just bring Bairstow in to open? Tough one.Puja wrote: ↑Fri Feb 24, 2023 10:46 am I don't see how we can persist with Crawley though. I do see why they have - he's definitely got something under there and they've done well out of trusting players and giving them time so far. However, I just don't see it coming out regularly enough.
Problem is that, while we'll have a log-jam of middle-order batsmen waiting for a space when Bairstow comes back, I don't rightly know who we'd bring in to open if we do ditch Crawley.
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 19294
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Hear what you say, but he does have a ton and a fifty in his last 5 tests and a 40. BUT his overall f/c average is only 30, and his test average only 28 after 32 (!) tests....so tricky. When he gets in, he tends to score well, as it were.Puja wrote: ↑Fri Feb 24, 2023 10:46 am I don't see how we can persist with Crawley though. I do see why they have - he's definitely got something under there and they've done well out of trusting players and giving them time so far. However, I just don't see it coming out regularly enough.
Problem is that, while we'll have a log-jam of middle-order batsmen waiting for a space when Bairstow comes back, I don't rightly know who we'd bring in to open if we do ditch Crawley.
Puja
-
- Posts: 19294
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
another great day. Nothing left to say re Anderson, but Leach may be 'turning' a corner 

- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Anderson & Broad cumulative totals..
340 matches, 1260 wickets.
Jimmy will surely overtake Warne to reach #2 on the World list, ,and stay ahead of Broad (!)
340 matches, 1260 wickets.

Jimmy will surely overtake Warne to reach #2 on the World list, ,and stay ahead of Broad (!)
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
- Puja
- Posts: 17804
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Ouch: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/64779863
PujaIsle of Man were dismissed for 10 - the lowest score in men's Twenty20 history - as they were beaten by Spain in the final game of their tour on Sunday.
Spain won the toss and chose to bowl, and Isle of Man were all out within 8.4 overs. Seven players were dismissed without scoring and Joseph Burrows top-scored with four.
...
Spain needed just two legitimate deliveries to chase the target. The first ball was a no-ball before right-handed batter Awais Ahmed hit the next two for six.
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 19294
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
- Puja
- Posts: 17804
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Have any of those scores been under any kind of pressure though? It just always seems like, whenever we've got a run chase to do, first wicket is Crawley, with some lazy shot or defence. Same again this time.Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Feb 24, 2023 11:49 amHear what you say, but he does have a ton and a fifty in his last 5 tests and a 40. BUT his overall f/c average is only 30, and his test average only 28 after 32 (!) tests....so tricky. When he gets in, he tends to score well, as it were.Puja wrote: ↑Fri Feb 24, 2023 10:46 am I don't see how we can persist with Crawley though. I do see why they have - he's definitely got something under there and they've done well out of trusting players and giving them time so far. However, I just don't see it coming out regularly enough.
Problem is that, while we'll have a log-jam of middle-order batsmen waiting for a space when Bairstow comes back, I don't rightly know who we'd bring in to open if we do ditch Crawley.
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 19294
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cricket fred
well yes, 1st test v Pakistan, when under personal pressure. But not convinced as above. And as you said, who else.Puja wrote: ↑Mon Feb 27, 2023 9:07 pmHave any of those scores been under any kind of pressure though? It just always seems like, whenever we've got a run chase to do, first wicket is Crawley, with some lazy shot or defence. Same again this time.Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Feb 24, 2023 11:49 amHear what you say, but he does have a ton and a fifty in his last 5 tests and a 40. BUT his overall f/c average is only 30, and his test average only 28 after 32 (!) tests....so tricky. When he gets in, he tends to score well, as it were.Puja wrote: ↑Fri Feb 24, 2023 10:46 am I don't see how we can persist with Crawley though. I do see why they have - he's definitely got something under there and they've done well out of trusting players and giving them time so far. However, I just don't see it coming out regularly enough.
Problem is that, while we'll have a log-jam of middle-order batsmen waiting for a space when Bairstow comes back, I don't rightly know who we'd bring in to open if we do ditch Crawley.
Puja
Puja
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Root the lynchpin as Eng stutter towards the line.
Just about favourites at this juncture, but plenty drama already..
Just about favourites at this juncture, but plenty drama already..
- Puja
- Posts: 17804
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Cricket fred
Root's got to do two batsmen's worth of batting after that comedy runout of Brook before he'd even faced a ball, and fair play to him, he's doing it so far.
Puja
Backist Monk