Page 149 of 161
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:02 pm
by Puja
Galfon wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 8:35 am
They're giving cricket a Bash over the pond at the moment with a new 'Major League Cricket' series - 6 teams from LA, SanFran, Seattle, NY, Washington and Dallas ('Texas')
The round-robin stage has been completed and running through the play-offs for the final.
The Orcas became the first side to reach the final of Major League Cricket, meanwhile, the Super Kings will take on MI New York in the Challenger on Friday for a place in the summit clash. The Major League Cricket Final will be held on Sunday.
https://www.majorleaguecricket.com/home
( some glitches on reporting scores it seems !..)
A lot of sell-out matches, albeit at smallish stadia, and some good matches and performances from familiar globe-trotting names. Jason Roy was there with mixed scores (his LA team finished bottom of the table.)
(ICC are keen to set USA up as genuine co-hosts for next years T20 World Cup with Windies, but there have been financial issues reportedly.)
Looks like it'll be at the 2028 LA Olympics as well:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/ ... mpic-games
Puja
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:10 pm
by Banquo
Brook bowling seems a tad soft tbh
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:15 pm
by Banquo
Yjb cocks up badly- beyond parody
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:16 pm
by Puja
Bairstow has fucked a run-out of Smith by knocking the stump before catching the ball. Unbelievable.
Puja
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:19 pm
by Banquo
Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:16 pm
Bairstow has fucked a run-out of Smith by knocking the stump before catching the ball. Unbelievable.
Puja
Fair to say yjb has had a pretty negative impact at key moments.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:20 pm
by Banquo
Weird passage of play.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:31 pm
by Banquo
Now smith hits consecutive 4’s anyone surprised. So poor from Bairstow unbelievable
17 byes.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:40 pm
by Banquo
Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:16 pm
Bairstow has fucked a run-out of Smith by knocking the stump before catching the ball. Unbelievable.
Puja
Just seen the replay terrible keeping- wrong side of the stumps
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:47 pm
by Puja
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:40 pm
Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:16 pm
Bairstow has fucked a run-out of Smith by knocking the stump before catching the ball. Unbelievable.
Puja
Just seen the replay terrible keeping- wrong side of the stumps
I have to say I think he's a touch unlucky not to've been given the runout anyway, as I'd've said the second bail was off the stump before Smith got back, but even so, that's yet another missed chance. Every keeper screws up sometimes and it's important to remember that not all of the ones that Bairstow has muffed would've been taken by Foakes, but the sheer volume is overwhelming.
Puja
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2023 6:43 pm
by Puja
I did say that we got about par for this pitch on day 1. Now it's basically a one-innings shoot-out and all depends on how big a total we can set up.
Puja
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2023 6:51 pm
by Galfon
A full day batting will bring 350-400 the way Eng. bat, which should be enough. 2- 2 would be a fair reflection of the series...
Depends on the pitch staying true enough tomorrow of course.
D@mn the OT weather, what a climax it could have been

Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2023 9:35 pm
by Banquo
Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 6:43 pm
I did say that we got about par for this pitch on day 1. Now it's basically a one-innings shoot-out and all depends on how big a total we can set up.
Puja
meh, Oz got at least 60 too many today.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2023 10:35 pm
by Banquo
Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:47 pm
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:40 pm
Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:16 pm
Bairstow has fucked a run-out of Smith by knocking the stump before catching the ball. Unbelievable.
Puja
Just seen the replay terrible keeping- wrong side of the stumps
I have to say I think he's a touch unlucky not to've been given the runout anyway, as I'd've said the second bail was off the stump before Smith got back, but even so, that's yet another missed chance. Every keeper screws up sometimes and it's important to remember that not all of the ones that Bairstow has muffed would've been taken by Foakes, but the sheer volume is overwhelming.
Puja
thats the laws...break the stumps before the ball arrives and can only get a run out by uprooting a stump whilst holding the ball.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2023 12:15 am
by Puja
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 10:35 pm
Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:47 pm
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:40 pm
Just seen the replay terrible keeping- wrong side of the stumps
I have to say I think he's a touch unlucky not to've been given the runout anyway, as I'd've said the second bail was off the stump before Smith got back, but even so, that's yet another missed chance. Every keeper screws up sometimes and it's important to remember that not all of the ones that Bairstow has muffed would've been taken by Foakes, but the sheer volume is overwhelming.
Puja
thats the laws...break the stumps before the ball arrives and can only get a run out by uprooting a stump whilst holding the ball.
I thought that was only if you took both bails off? So if one bail remains in place, you'd have the option to then remove that one? I reserve the right to be wrong - I don't have the same depth of knowledge of cricket laws that I do rugby ones.
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 9:35 pmmeh, Oz got at least 60 too many today.
You're probably right, although Smith and the bowling to Murphy were the only two things which we got drastically wrong. And those two probably cost us about 60 runs, so yeah - on second thought, I agree.
Puja
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2023 8:22 am
by Banquo
Puja wrote: ↑Sat Jul 29, 2023 12:15 am
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 10:35 pm
Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:47 pm
I have to say I think he's a touch unlucky not to've been given the runout anyway, as I'd've said the second bail was off the stump before Smith got back, but even so, that's yet another missed chance. Every keeper screws up sometimes and it's important to remember that not all of the ones that Bairstow has muffed would've been taken by Foakes, but the sheer volume is overwhelming.
Puja
thats the laws...break the stumps before the ball arrives and can only get a run out by uprooting a stump whilst holding the ball.
I thought that was only if you took both bails off? So if one bail remains in place, you'd have the option to then remove that one? I reserve the right to be wrong - I don't have the same depth of knowledge of cricket laws that I do rugby ones.
Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Jul 28, 2023 9:35 pmmeh, Oz got at least 60 too many today.
You're probably right, although Smith and the bowling to Murphy were the only two things which we got drastically wrong. And those two probably cost us about 60 runs, so yeah - on second thought, I agree.
Puja
Have checked the laws and you are correct....in which case, I think he was out tbf.
But YJB should have been in position not for it to be an issue.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2023 11:26 am
by Banquo
lol 40 off 4 overs. maaad
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2023 12:28 pm
by Banquo
fckit dckit
ball starting to swing. danger time.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2023 1:17 pm
by fivepointer
Virtually perfect morning for England. 1 wicket down and a 100+ run lead.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2023 1:20 pm
by Puja
Two quick wickets will always change the perspective, but we are in a very solid position. This is the best of Bazball - the high scoring rate is discombobulating the bowlers and making them chase us, which gives more bad balls to hit. There's probably as much life in the pitch as there was for Australia's second innings, but the difference is that they got 54-1 in their morning while we got 130-1 - same number of dangerous balls and strokes of luck, but we took advantage inbetween them. Australia felt like they lost their morning session while we very definitely won ours.
If we can see off the first 5 overs after lunch, get Crawley and Stokes back into the groove, then we can tuck in for the afternoon. Ideal would be to bat the day out, maybe even a little of Sunday morning, give our bowlers (and especially Moeen) the best chance to rest and recuperate, and then get the Aussies in to chase 400+ when there's cloud and frequent breaks for rain on Sunday and Monday.
The "If" at the start of that paragraph is the big bit though.
Puja
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2023 1:51 pm
by Puja
And, there it is. Crawley never looks the same player after an interruption and this was his vulnerable period.
Puja
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2023 2:54 pm
by Banquo
Puja wrote: ↑Sat Jul 29, 2023 1:51 pm
And, there it is. Crawley never looks the same player after an interruption and this was his vulnerable period.
Puja
still, he has had a good series.
Stokes goes.....doh. Bit daft.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2023 3:12 pm
by Puja
Banquo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 29, 2023 2:54 pm
Puja wrote: ↑Sat Jul 29, 2023 1:51 pm
And, there it is. Crawley never looks the same player after an interruption and this was his vulnerable period.
Puja
still, he has had a good series.
Oh, undoubtedly. Fine series and he's absolutely made me eat my words about him.
Puja
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2023 3:14 pm
by Puja
Bairstow out cheaply playing a loose shot.
Well, it's not happened yet, but it's absolutely going to happen, so I may as well beat the rush and get my comment in early.
Puja
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2023 3:18 pm
by Banquo
great ball to get Brook. makes stokes poor shot worse, sans Ali not ideal.
Re: Cricket fred
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2023 3:49 pm
by Banquo
sure aint dull