And also fans. There's money in them there hills.AL. wrote:Fair point, when you look at it like that.Big D wrote:Absolutely I want them to go. The players will hold the Lions in the highest regards. By going it will show them they are equal or even better than those From other countries.AL. wrote:As we know Gatland is a fud. Do we really want half our squad taken away for the summer and given a hiding, or should Toonie have them all together to start his tenure?
In VCs 1st tour he scattered the caps around a bit and this tour gives a chance to look at others where the players ahead are practically undroppable. Second row, wing, full back as examples.
Lions
Moderator: OptimisticJock
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: RE: Re: Lions
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14548
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Lions
YepEugene Wrayburn wrote:Exactly this.Cameo wrote:I dont know how this has become the Ford threat but I might as well join in. I think he's class. He's lost his spark a wee bit but still does the basics very well and has a natural feeling for putting people into space
- morepork
- Posts: 7520
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Lions
switchskier wrote:So Rob Howley, Lions backs coach, has just picked the same team for Wales again. So how many welshmen do you think will be in the backline for the first test? I'm going to guess at four, none of whom I'd select (Bigger, Davies, North and Halfpenny).
How the fork did he get that gig? It's just cruel.
-
- Posts: 2968
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm
Re: Lions
I heard Shaun Edwards on the radio last night saying that one of the advantages England have is that, because of their depth, all of their players know that if they don't perform, they will be out of the next game. He didn't seem to see the irony that him and his boss had just picked exactly the same team yet again "to give them a chance to redeem themselves" despite all the fans calling for changesmorepork wrote:switchskier wrote:So Rob Howley, Lions backs coach, has just picked the same team for Wales again. So how many welshmen do you think will be in the backline for the first test? I'm going to guess at four, none of whom I'd select (Bigger, Davies, North and Halfpenny).
How the fork did he get that gig? It's just cruel.
- morepork
- Posts: 7520
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Lions
Cameo wrote:I heard Shaun Edwards on the radio last night saying that one of the advantages England have is that, because of their depth, all of their players know that if they don't perform, they will be out of the next game. He didn't seem to see the irony that him and his boss had just picked exactly the same team yet again "to give them a chance to redeem themselves" despite all the fans calling for changesmorepork wrote:switchskier wrote:So Rob Howley, Lions backs coach, has just picked the same team for Wales again. So how many welshmen do you think will be in the backline for the first test? I'm going to guess at four, none of whom I'd select (Bigger, Davies, North and Halfpenny).
How the fork did he get that gig? It's just cruel.
Sean Edwards is a pantomime villian in an expensive track suit.
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:26 pm
Re: Lions
Wait there's more.morepork wrote:switchskier wrote:So Rob Howley, Lions backs coach, has just picked the same team for Wales again. So how many welshmen do you think will be in the backline for the first test? I'm going to guess at four, none of whom I'd select (Bigger, Davies, North and Halfpenny).
How the fork did he get that gig? It's just cruel.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/39228332
-
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Lions
I don't mind that appointment. He was never the problem with the England set up.ARM wrote:Wait there's more.morepork wrote:switchskier wrote:So Rob Howley, Lions backs coach, has just picked the same team for Wales again. So how many welshmen do you think will be in the backline for the first test? I'm going to guess at four, none of whom I'd select (Bigger, Davies, North and Halfpenny).
How the fork did he get that gig? It's just cruel.![]()
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/39228332
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Lions
Unless there's a big performance next week could we see more Scots than Irish this year?
On this year alone I'd take Furlong, Stander, Murray, Sexton (lack of other options) and possibly Zebo & Henshaw. Not great.
On this year alone I'd take Furlong, Stander, Murray, Sexton (lack of other options) and possibly Zebo & Henshaw. Not great.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Lions
We've both still got to play England so who knows. A lot will depend on whose players are more vulnerable to Welsh players who I expect to be disproportionately represented.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Unless there's a big performance next week could we see more Scots than Irish this year?
On this year alone I'd take Furlong, Stander, Murray, Sexton (lack of other options) and possibly Zebo & Henshaw. Not great.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Lions
I fully expect your lot to put in a performance next week but if they don't then it doesn't look great.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:We've both still got to play England so who knows. A lot will depend on whose players are more vulnerable to Welsh players who I expect to be disproportionately represented.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Unless there's a big performance next week could we see more Scots than Irish this year?
On this year alone I'd take Furlong, Stander, Murray, Sexton (lack of other options) and possibly Zebo & Henshaw. Not great.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Lions
To be honest having been quite optimistic about the form of the home nations after the first couple of rounds, I've really been brought down to earth over the past couple of rounds. My inclination now would be to use the Scots as the basis of the side and graft on a front row. That won't happen of course. The basis will be Wales and England with a few additions.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:I fully expect your lot to put in a performance next week but if they don't then it doesn't look great.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:We've both still got to play England so who knows. A lot will depend on whose players are more vulnerable to Welsh players who I expect to be disproportionately represented.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Unless there's a big performance next week could we see more Scots than Irish this year?
On this year alone I'd take Furlong, Stander, Murray, Sexton (lack of other options) and possibly Zebo & Henshaw. Not great.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 12078
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Lions
Hmm. Yet to see Scotland perform under any real expectation. On a positive note I think it will be (hopefully) great to see a pretty balanced squad representation. I could probably quite happily pick 10 from each country to go. Don't see Gatland going there?Eugene Wrayburn wrote:To be honest having been quite optimistic about the form of the home nations after the first couple of rounds, I've really been brought down to earth over the past couple of rounds. My inclination now would be to use the Scots as the basis of the side and graft on a front row. That won't happen of course. The basis will be Wales and England with a few additions.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:I fully expect your lot to put in a performance next week but if they don't then it doesn't look great.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:
We've both still got to play England so who knows. A lot will depend on whose players are more vulnerable to Welsh players who I expect to be disproportionately represented.
-
- Posts: 12078
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Lions
Hmm. Yet to see Scotland perform under any real expectation.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:To be honest having been quite optimistic about the form of the home nations after the first couple of rounds, I've really been brought down to earth over the past couple of rounds. My inclination now would be to use the Scots as the basis of the side and graft on a front row. That won't happen of course. The basis will be Wales and England with a few additions.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:I fully expect your lot to put in a performance next week but if they don't then it doesn't look great.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:
We've both still got to play England so who knows. A lot will depend on whose players are more vulnerable to Welsh players who I expect to be disproportionately represented.
On a positive note I think it will be (hopefully) great to see a pretty balanced squad representation. I could probably quite happily pick 10 from each country to go. Don't see Gatland going there?
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Lions
Ah well that's me told. England will be the base. Scotland will get a token representation again. You deserve better, but Gatland clearly doesn't rate you and the excuse not to pick Scottish players is there now.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: Lions
They hand delivered him the chance to be honest.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Ah well that's me told. England will be the base. Scotland will get a token representation again. You deserve better, but Gatland clearly doesn't rate you and the excuse not to pick Scottish players is there now.
At least the weeg players have the sarries game.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14548
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Lions
Last night's result will be used as an excuse to take Welsh players who shouldn't be on the planeEugene Wrayburn wrote:We've both still got to play England so who knows. A lot will depend on whose players are more vulnerable to Welsh players who I expect to be disproportionately represented.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Unless there's a big performance next week could we see more Scots than Irish this year?
On this year alone I'd take Furlong, Stander, Murray, Sexton (lack of other options) and possibly Zebo & Henshaw. Not great.
-
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Lions
Back to back championships mean that England should provide the base. They have some fantastically gifted, athletic, players and the trick will be to enhance that by picking a squad that can get the most out of, for example, Joseph's ability to make the outside break.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Ah well that's me told. England will be the base. Scotland will get a token representation again. You deserve better, but Gatland clearly doesn't rate you and the excuse not to pick Scottish players is there now.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Lions
That's absolutely fine with me. The Lions Tour is for the Welsh, Irish & English fans anyway. More to the point we have an awful lot to work on, I'd rather we had a full squad for the summer. Hogg will tour & we need to be developing Kinghorn to back him up anyway... him going off had more of an effect on the team than the yellow IMO. We will have a far better bench once Kinghorn is covering 10 & 15 and we need to get him blooded.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Ah well that's me told. England will be the base. Scotland will get a token representation again. You deserve better, but Gatland clearly doesn't rate you and the excuse not to pick Scottish players is there now.
-
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: Lions
You'd be surprised. Plenty Scots fans tour and watch on tele.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:That's absolutely fine with me. The Lions Tour is for the Welsh, Irish & English fans anyway.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Ah well that's me told. England will be the base. Scotland will get a token representation again. You deserve better, but Gatland clearly doesn't rate you and the excuse not to pick Scottish players is there now.
-
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: Lions
Knee and head.Adder wrote:I played at noon and have been drinking ever since. What happened to b3nnet and hogg?
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
Bennett didn't look good and I think it's a real dull one.
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Lions
Every team has had at least one game in which they looked clueless and at least one in which they looked like they could be the core of the Lions.
-
- Posts: 12078
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Lions
Yup. The talk of vast chasms between any of the teams has mostly been bollocks. England and Italy have the biggest gaps between them and anyone else but they're not enormous, that's about it.Buggaluggs wrote:Every team has had at least one game in which they looked clueless and at least one in which they looked like they could be the core of the Lions.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: RE: Re: Lions
I'm aware. Was very enjoyable supporting the saffers in 2009.Big D wrote:You'd be surprised. Plenty Scots fans tour and watch on tele.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:That's absolutely fine with me. The Lions Tour is for the Welsh, Irish & English fans anyway.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Ah well that's me told. England will be the base. Scotland will get a token representation again. You deserve better, but Gatland clearly doesn't rate you and the excuse not to pick Scottish players is there now.