RugbyRebels

Son of Mathonwy wrote: There may be an argument for it, but it's not that. A tiny proportion of the Jews are billionaires - you can't extrapolate from that to say something about ALL of the Jews.

A tiny percentage of negroes are very successful at sports, particularly track and field.

Far more successful than whites, for example.

Would you agree?

Vengeful Glutton wrote:

Son of Mathonwy wrote:

Vengeful Glutton wrote:
I thought it was quite flattering.

You may well do, but directing it at one person is one thing, at a whole group it's something else.

Of the 7 billion people on the planet 15 - 20 million are jews. About 50% of the billionaires on the planet are jewish. How can that 50% come from a teeny weeny itsy bitsy proportion of the human population?

I'd say it's reasonable to conclude that jews are very good with money, and that their skills at negotiations are, in general, superlative.

May we have a reference for this 50% figure? I'm loathe to search for wealth rankings on the basis of ethnicity, as that has proved a troublesome metric historically. More problematic still is how one identifies these "Jews" in regions not defined by religion, say Asia? Is there a register for religion in this database you allude to? Why don't you share what is really on your mind with us all.

Vengeful Glutton wrote:

Son of Mathonwy wrote: There may be an argument for it, but it's not that. A tiny proportion of the Jews are billionaires - you can't extrapolate from that to say something about ALL of the Jews.

A tiny percentage of negroes are very successful at sports, particularly track and field.

Far more successful than whites, for example.

Would you agree?

Do you mean people of African descent? What does your phrenology website say about this anthropologic conundrum?

morepork wrote:

Vengeful Glutton wrote:

Son of Mathonwy wrote: There may be an argument for it, but it's not that. A tiny proportion of the Jews are billionaires - you can't extrapolate from that to say something about ALL of the Jews.

A tiny percentage of negroes are very successful at sports, particularly track and field.

Far more successful than whites, for example.

Would you agree?

Do you mean people of African descent? What does your phrenology website say about this anthropologic conundrum?

Have you swallowed a dictionary this evening Jethro?

Your pc indignant radar doesn't miss a trick on here does it, as soon as colour, religion or race is questioned, you're all over it like a rash. Is it just in cyber space you are like that? or do your ears prick up and home in on such matters when you are out and about, having a beer or cup o tea, whatever. I suppose what I am saying is, are you a full time pc policeman or just a pc special constable?

Lord Lucan wrote:

morepork wrote:

Vengeful Glutton wrote:
A tiny percentage of negroes are very successful at sports, particularly track and field.

Far more successful than whites, for example.

Would you agree?

Do you mean people of African descent? What does your phrenology website say about this anthropologic conundrum?

Have you swallowed a dictionary this evening Jethro?

Your pc indignant radar doesn't miss a trick on here does it, as soon as colour, religion or race is questioned, you're all over it like a rash. Is it just in cyber space you are like that? or do your ears prick up and home in on such matters when you are out and about, having a beer or cup o tea, whatever. I suppose what I am saying is, are you a full time pc policeman or just a pc special constable?

I have an education, if that is what scares you so.

Vengeful Glutton wrote:

Son of Mathonwy wrote: There may be an argument for it, but it's not that. A tiny proportion of the Jews are billionaires - you can't extrapolate from that to say something about ALL of the Jews.

A tiny percentage of negroes are very successful at sports, particularly track and field.

Far more successful than whites, for example.

Would you agree?

Again, you are talking about outliers.

Anyway, my impression is that black or "of African descent" are preferred terms. Terms for something which is pretty hard to define when you start looking at it closely. Of little "taxonomic significance" as some would say.

Personally, I'd rather consider each person as an individual rather than according to some label. Then I won't prejudge anyone.

I hope Jodie Whittaker is reading all this.

Mikey Brown wrote:I hope Jodie Whittaker is reading all this.

Does she have any negro friends?

Mikey Brown wrote:I hope Jodie Whittaker is reading all this.

She must be gutted to be responsible* for this thread.




* some might disagree with my use of the term

morepork wrote:

Vengeful Glutton wrote:

Son of Mathonwy wrote: There may be an argument for it, but it's not that. A tiny proportion of the Jews are billionaires - you can't extrapolate from that to say something about ALL of the Jews.

A tiny percentage of negroes are very successful at sports, particularly track and field.

Far more successful than whites, for example.

Would you agree?

Do you mean people of African descent? What does your phrenology website say about this anthropologic conundrum?

Are you at all surprised to see the twelvie edgelord use outdated and, in some cases, racist terms?

Son of Mathonwy wrote:
Anyway, my impression is that black or "of African descent" are preferred terms. Terms for something which is pretty hard to define when you start looking at it closely. Of little "taxonomic significance" as some would say.

Personally, I'd rather consider each person as an individual rather than according to some label. Then I won't prejudge anyone.

On that basis, Kevin Myers's opinion is equally as valid as yours.

It's nothing to do with outliers. Spot the white boy.



As well as setting the fastest times, why have blacks consistently dominated the Olympic 100 meter dash?

morepork wrote:

Vengeful Glutton wrote:

Son of Mathonwy wrote: There may be an argument for it, but it's not that. A tiny proportion of the Jews are billionaires - you can't extrapolate from that to say something about ALL of the Jews.

A tiny percentage of negroes are very successful at sports, particularly track and field.

Far more successful than whites, for example.

Would you agree?

Do you mean people of African descent? What does your phrenology website say about this anthropologic conundrum?

They're called negroes. Does that word bother you?

Lord Lucan wrote:

morepork wrote:

Vengeful Glutton wrote:
A tiny percentage of negroes are very successful at sports, particularly track and field.

Far more successful than whites, for example.

Would you agree?

Do you mean people of African descent? What does your phrenology website say about this anthropologic conundrum?

Have you swallowed a dictionary this evening Jethro?

Your pc indignant radar doesn't miss a trick on here does it, as soon as colour, religion or race is questioned, you're all over it like a rash. Is it just in cyber space you are like that? or do your ears prick up and home in on such matters when you are out and about, having a beer or cup o tea, whatever. I suppose what I am saying is, are you a full time pc policeman or just a pc special constable?

PC policeman indeed, and yet he effortlessly uttered the racist slur "cracker" on another thread.

Vengeful Glutton wrote:

Son of Mathonwy wrote:
Anyway, my impression is that black or "of African descent" are preferred terms. Terms for something which is pretty hard to define when you start looking at it closely. Of little "taxonomic significance" as some would say.

Personally, I'd rather consider each person as an individual rather than according to some label. Then I won't prejudge anyone.

On that basis, Kevin Myers's opinion is equally as valid as yours.

It's nothing to do with outliers. Spot the white boy.



As well as setting the fastest times, why have blacks consistently dominated the Olympic 100 meter dash?

You think olympic sprinters are not outliers?

Show me the stats which show that on average all dark-skinned people of african descent (not just those from certain parts of Africa) are faster sprinters than people of different skin colour and you will begin to make your case.

Vengeful Glutton wrote:

Lord Lucan wrote:

morepork wrote:
Do you mean people of African descent? What does your phrenology website say about this anthropologic conundrum?

Have you swallowed a dictionary this evening Jethro?

Your pc indignant radar doesn't miss a trick on here does it, as soon as colour, religion or race is questioned, you're all over it like a rash. Is it just in cyber space you are like that? or do your ears prick up and home in on such matters when you are out and about, having a beer or cup o tea, whatever. I suppose what I am saying is, are you a full time pc policeman or just a pc special constable?

PC policeman indeed, and yet he effortlessly uttered the racist slur "cracker" on another thread.

Do you need a safe place hon? Do you feel set upon?

Vengeful Glutton wrote:

Son of Mathonwy wrote:
Anyway, my impression is that black or "of African descent" are preferred terms. Terms for something which is pretty hard to define when you start looking at it closely. Of little "taxonomic significance" as some would say.

Personally, I'd rather consider each person as an individual rather than according to some label. Then I won't prejudge anyone.

On that basis, Kevin Myers's opinion is equally as valid as yours.

It's nothing to do with outliers. Spot the white boy.



As well as setting the fastest times, why have blacks consistently dominated the Olympic 100 meter dash?

Because you are a slow cunt?

This isn't the right forum for pics of new nip-lord Jodie Whittaker is it?

https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/20 ... doctor-who

SFW but completely uninteresting. Unless the word nude in big letters is a problem.

My god, I'm bored today.

Mikey Brown wrote:This isn't the right forum for pics of new nip-lord Jodie Whittaker is it?

See! Porno has-been Tom Baker has 'em all at it.

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:

Mikey Brown wrote:This isn't the right forum for pics of new nip-lord Jodie Whittaker is it?

See! Porno has-been Tom Baker has 'em all at it.

Speaking of Tom Baker, I was told by a Brit I know that back when BT had his voice reading texts sent to landlines, he, as an awkward teen with a girlfriend, sent her a particularly steamy text message. But in his teenaged ineptness, he accidentally sent it to her home number, where her dad had a landline phone right next to his bed. Long story short, he's responsible for the dad of his girlfriend at the time getting a particularly dirty phone call from the 4th Doctor in the middle of the night.

cashead wrote:

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:

Mikey Brown wrote:This isn't the right forum for pics of new nip-lord Jodie Whittaker is it?

See! Porno has-been Tom Baker has 'em all at it.

Speaking of Tom Baker, I was told by a Brit I know that back when BT had his voice reading texts sent to landlines, he, as an awkward teen with a girlfriend, sent her a particularly steamy text message. But in his teenaged ineptness, he accidentally sent it to her home number, where her dad had a landline phone right next to his bed. Long story short, he's responsible for the dad of his girlfriend at the time getting a particularly dirty phone call from the 4th Doctor in the middle of the night.

FFS! When Tom Baker was a teen they were still sending dirty telegrams.