Quins V Tigers Sat 3pm

[Mikey Brown]

I'm feeling pretty sore about this one. Really not a lot in it, so perhaps not an entirely unfair result but I have no idea how Cole and Genge avoided being carded.

Pretty sure that penalty that won the game at the end should have been a penalty to Quins about 60 yards further back up the pitch.

What? For Veainu colliding with Brown which jumping for the charge down? How was that a penalty?

I'll give you Cole and Genge both needing yellows - I thought the ref had forgotten to pack his cards they were such poor decisions.

Puja

No - for Veainu jumping in to Yarde. It was accidental, but his elbow made contact with Yarde's face so it was a penalty for me. Or let's say, we've all seen them given.

Had either one of those blatant yellows been given, I think Quins would have won.

I definitely feel like some big things got missed that would have worked in our favour but it was a such a frantic game I'm finding it hard to be sure about anything. I feel a draw would have been a fair result.

[Scrumhead]

A draw probably would have been fair. However, Cole should have been carded every single day of the week and had Leicester played with 14 men at the end of the first half, I fancy we would have pulled away a bit more emphatically.

I didn't occur to me at the time, but had Genge been carded before Care's try, it would have been his second yellow ...

[Banquo]

Genge for me didn't deserve a yellow. Care passed straight to him (classic loopy pass), and there were no quins around that would have taken. Absolutely a penalty, but if Genge had left it, Quins would have been under serious pressure to even keep possession there I reckon.

of its sort, I don't think I've seen a clearer case for a yellow.

[Puja]

A draw probably would have been fair. However, Cole should have been carded every single day of the week and had Leicester played with 14 men at the end of the first half, I fancy we would have pulled away a bit more emphatically.

I didn't occur to me at the time, but had Genge been carded before Care's try, it would have been his second yellow ...

That was before his actual yellow, so it would've been the first. I suspect the ref would've given a more explicit warning about "the next scrum sees you both off" and given a chance for Tigers to make a sub if it would've meant a red card for one of them.

The ref should've yellow carded Cole, Genge, whichever Quins player killed the ball on their 5, Collier when he refused to scrummage on his own 5m line, and also Collier and Genge much much earlier so that the f*cking about stopped sooner. Bit of a weak performance from the ref and it affected the rest of the game.

Puja