Re: Argentina tour
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2025 6:01 pm
I have to say I really don’t think this was the case - yes he was good in the lineout and could use his pace to make some great cover tackles but I would have had Haskell or Robshaw or Moody or Wordsley in the 6 shirt every time over Croft, simply on grounds of pure physicality and power.Croft was used by us like Pierre Spies was used by the boks - a round peg in a square hole.Puja wrote: ↑Mon Apr 28, 2025 5:49 pm Croft's best international performances came when he was used as a conventional flanker with the Lions. He suffered from the same thing as Peter Crouch in football - football anagers saw a 6ft7 striker and put the ball to him in the air, when his main skills were with his feet, and rugby managers looked at a flanker with incredible pace and decided he should sit in the 13 channel all the time, when his main skills were traditional forwards ones.
Puja
I have to say you say this time after time, yet Croft has more Lions caps than all the above.....combined. He was a very special talent....the others you mention decent internationals.jngf wrote: ↑Mon Apr 28, 2025 6:47 pmI have to say I really don’t think this was the case - yes he was good in the lineout and could use his pace to make some great cover tackles but I would have had Haskell or Robshaw or Moody or Wordsley in the 6 shirt every time over Croft, simply on grounds of pure physicality and power.Croft was used by us like Pierre Spies was used by the boks - a round peg in a square hole.Puja wrote: ↑Mon Apr 28, 2025 5:49 pm Croft's best international performances came when he was used as a conventional flanker with the Lions. He suffered from the same thing as Peter Crouch in football - football anagers saw a 6ft7 striker and put the ball to him in the air, when his main skills were with his feet, and rugby managers looked at a flanker with incredible pace and decided he should sit in the 13 channel all the time, when his main skills were traditional forwards ones.
Puja
Cause the Tigers old guard that were in the squad at the start and in the coaching team throughout Croft's career were well known to love show ponies in the pack obviously.jngf wrote: ↑Mon Apr 28, 2025 6:47 pmI have to say I really don’t think this was the case - yes he was good in the lineout and could use his pace to make some great cover tackles but I would have had Haskell or Robshaw or Moody or Wordsley in the 6 shirt every time over Croft, simply on grounds of pure physicality and power.Croft was used by us like Pierre Spies was used by the boks - a round peg in a square hole.Puja wrote: ↑Mon Apr 28, 2025 5:49 pm Croft's best international performances came when he was used as a conventional flanker with the Lions. He suffered from the same thing as Peter Crouch in football - football anagers saw a 6ft7 striker and put the ball to him in the air, when his main skills were with his feet, and rugby managers looked at a flanker with incredible pace and decided he should sit in the 13 channel all the time, when his main skills were traditional forwards ones.
Puja
I will generally give you a lot of latitude on your opinions - I may not agree with you oftimes, but it's interesting to hear a different perspective. On this occasion however, you are just factually incorrect. The situation was not as you remember it.jngf wrote: ↑Mon Apr 28, 2025 6:47 pmI have to say I really don’t think this was the case - yes he was good in the lineout and could use his pace to make some great cover tackles but I would have had Haskell or Robshaw or Moody or Wordsley in the 6 shirt every time over Croft, simply on grounds of pure physicality and power.Croft was used by us like Pierre Spies was used by the boks - a round peg in a square hole.Puja wrote: ↑Mon Apr 28, 2025 5:49 pm Croft's best international performances came when he was used as a conventional flanker with the Lions. He suffered from the same thing as Peter Crouch in football - football anagers saw a 6ft7 striker and put the ball to him in the air, when his main skills were with his feet, and rugby managers looked at a flanker with incredible pace and decided he should sit in the 13 channel all the time, when his main skills were traditional forwards ones.
Puja
He's 29 and has the Rokoduguni effect of only having been playing top-level rugby for 5 years so his body's been under less stress, but I agree with your premise. It's annoying - he's such a good player and it feels like, if he did get a run in the team, he'd probably be fantastic, but there's just so much talent around with incredible USPs that you can't work out how he fits in.
OHC's had a great year, but again I don't know where he fits in. You've got IFW and Freeman as the undisputed, then Roebuck and Sleightholme as being very nearly nailed onto the squad. Murley is probably just below the latter two, given they've shown they can step up and excel and he hasn't definitively (yet). Even we're saying Freeman's with the Lions and Sleightholme and IFW are injured, then we already have both wing spots filled by Roebuck-Murley, so we're talking about a bench option, at best, for one of the morass of (mostly untried) exciting players.
Croft was an excellent flanker in all aspects required, including physicality in contact. His wing-standard pace and his lock-standard line-out presence were 'extras'. IMO, he was the second-best English 6 of my rugby-watching, only narrowly behind Richard Hill. If I was picking an all-time back row I'd be tempted to include both by moving Hill to 7.Puja wrote: ↑Mon Apr 28, 2025 7:14 pmI will generally give you a lot of latitude on your opinions - I may not agree with you oftimes, but it's interesting to hear a different perspective. On this occasion however, you are just factually incorrect. The situation was not as you remember it.jngf wrote: ↑Mon Apr 28, 2025 6:47 pmI have to say I really don’t think this was the case - yes he was good in the lineout and could use his pace to make some great cover tackles but I would have had Haskell or Robshaw or Moody or Wordsley in the 6 shirt every time over Croft, simply on grounds of pure physicality and power.Croft was used by us like Pierre Spies was used by the boks - a round peg in a square hole.Puja wrote: ↑Mon Apr 28, 2025 5:49 pm Croft's best international performances came when he was used as a conventional flanker with the Lions. He suffered from the same thing as Peter Crouch in football - football anagers saw a 6ft7 striker and put the ball to him in the air, when his main skills were with his feet, and rugby managers looked at a flanker with incredible pace and decided he should sit in the 13 channel all the time, when his main skills were traditional forwards ones.
Puja
Puja
Only one thing I'd say about OHC is that he has a howitzer of a left foot. He uses it terribly but it could potentially set him apart as we aren't stacked with centres with notable kicking games and our flyhalfs and Furbank aren't known for their range. With some coaching could he offer the Daly/Lowe style big clearance option?Puja wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 12:28 pmOHC's had a great year, but again I don't know where he fits in. You've got IFW and Freeman as the undisputed, then Roebuck and Sleightholme as being very nearly nailed onto the squad. Murley is probably just below the latter two, given they've shown they can step up and excel and he hasn't definitively (yet). Even we're saying Freeman's with the Lions and Sleightholme and IFW are injured, then we already have both wing spots filled by Roebuck-Murley, so we're talking about a bench option, at best, for one of the morass of (mostly untried) exciting players.
Plus, there's the option of Arundell, given that Selects Bigthighs has specifically answered a question of when he was available with, “As I understand, as soon as the Racing season finishes then he’s going to be available for selection."
I'd rank the pretenders as:
1) Arundell - I think we need to get him back reintegrated as quickly as possible and this tour's an ideal opportunity to get his confidence and swagger back.
2=)Radwan/Brown-Bampoe/Hendy - Tied between these three and I can't separate them. Radwan's got that incredible pace and seems to have gone up another level after moving from the English!Connacht, Hendy has that incredibly weird running style that seems so effective in breaking contact, and Brown-Bampoe has so little experience but appears to have everything you'd want from him.
5) OHC - Top Prem try-scorer, but how confident are we that he can make space as well as finish?
6=) Elliot/Muir - look like great players, but maybe just club-level?
8) Ibitoye - will make a great Barbarians player at some point and will have pundits demanding his selection, but is too loose and would not survive the step-up against the very best.
And that's assuming that we're completely done with the likes of Daly and Cokanasiga (neither of which are certainties).
Puja
? which games do you refer to?FKAS wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 1:46 pmArundell who looked work shy for England previously.Puja wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 12:28 pmOHC's had a great year, but again I don't know where he fits in. You've got IFW and Freeman as the undisputed, then Roebuck and Sleightholme as being very nearly nailed onto the squad. Murley is probably just below the latter two, given they've shown they can step up and excel and he hasn't definitively (yet). Even we're saying Freeman's with the Lions and Sleightholme and IFW are injured, then we already have both wing spots filled by Roebuck-Murley, so we're talking about a bench option, at best, for one of the morass of (mostly untried) exciting players.
Plus, there's the option of Arundell, given that Selects Bigthighs has specifically answered a question of when he was available with, “As I understand, as soon as the Racing season finishes then he’s going to be available for selection."
I'd rank the pretenders as:
1) Arundell - I think we need to get him back reintegrated as quickly as possible and this tour's an ideal opportunity to get his confidence and swagger back.
2=)Radwan/Brown-Bampoe/Hendy - Tied between these three and I can't separate them. Radwan's got that incredible pace and seems to have gone up another level after moving from the English!Connacht, Hendy has that incredibly weird running style that seems so effective in breaking contact, and Brown-Bampoe has so little experience but appears to have everything you'd want from him.
5) OHC - Top Prem try-scorer, but how confident are we that he can make space as well as finish?
6=) Elliot/Muir - look like great players, but maybe just club-level?
8) Ibitoye - will make a great Barbarians player at some point and will have pundits demanding his selection, but is too loose and would not survive the step-up against the very best.
And that's assuming that we're completely done with the likes of Daly and Cokanasiga (neither of which are certainties).
Puja
Which was the one where Farrell screamed at him to chase the kicks?