No Pro Rugby for Anyone in 2017?

Moderator: Puja

User avatar
Puja
Posts: 16979
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: No Pro Rugby for Anyone in 2017?

Post by Puja »

For your reference, here is the first draft of the grievance filed by Michael Fealey.

Dear Sirs,

It is with a heavy heart that I write to you today in this manner. My conscience sadly, dictates that I must speak out. I am writing to you today to file a formal grievance with the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive of the Union, as per Union by-laws, stating my grievance(s) and I await your timely responses.
My grievance(s) are numerous and span several iterations of the Board, with differing members, and two different Chief Executives. They are listed below in what I hope is appropriate order based on a timeline ending today, July 10th, 2017 and beginning some years before.

1. Conflict of Interest (in Hosting the Sevens Rugby World Cup).
The Chairman of the Board, whilst not Chairman at the time has business interests in the hosting of the Sevens Rugby World Cup 2018. Mr. Chang joined the Board of Directors in 2012. In 2014 USA Rugby announced that it would bid to host the Sevens Rugby World Cup using stadiums owned by the now Chairman of the Board, Mr. Chang. Mr. Chang is profiting from business decisions he has direct influence and control over due to his position on the Board of Directors. In contravention of USA Rugby By-Law Article (V) Section 5.1

2. Gross Negligence and Failure in Duty of Loyalty and Duty of Care to the Union (of former CEO and the Board) in creation of Rugby International Marketing (RIM) and its subsidiaries.
The former CEO and the Board at the time did knowingly strip USA rugby of all its commercial rights in return for cents on the dollar of future revenue when prior to said creation, the Union owned 100% of its rights. In contravention of USA Rugby By-Laws Article (V), Section 5.1. (e).

3. Gross Negligence and Failure in Duty of Care (of former CEO and the Board) to act in the best interests of the Union in selling equity in RIM for local currency as opposed to US dollar. A decision which, after the Brexit vote and corresponding currency fluctuation cost the Union hundreds of thousands of dollars. In contravention of USA Rugby By-Law Article (V) Section 5.1 (f)

4. Misconduct and Collusion (of former CEO and the Board) in refusal of sanction of the NRFL game to be played in Philadelphia on grounds of player safety. Those grounds were tenuous at best but the announcement of the PRO Rugby sanction that followed shortly clearly outlines the intentions of the Board to manipulate the grounds for which professional rugby would operate in their favor, despite their Mission and Role not pertaining to Professional Sport as per Ted Stevens Act. In contravention of USA Rugby By-Law Article (ii) Section 2.2, Article (V) Section 5.1, Ted Stevens Act, Section 22052. Eligibility Requirements (5) (a)(1)

5. Gross Negligence and Failure in Duty of Care (of former CEO and the Board) in not seeking proper legal counsel with regards to the Sanctioning of PRO Rugby and therefore exposing the Union to potential Anti-Trust civil and criminal law suits. In contravention of USA Rugby By-Law Article (V) Section 5.1

6. Gross Misconduct in signing PRO Rugby Contract and attempted coercion of monopolizing the league as the players’ agents and exposing the Union to potential Anti-Trust civil and criminal law suits. In contravention of USA Rugby By-Law Article (V) Section 5.1

7. Failing in Duty of Care to members when it became apparent that the owner of said league was abusing our members (his players) services and bringing the game into disrepute. In contravention of USA Rugby By-Law Article (ii) Section 2.2 (i)

8. Conspiracy and Collusion, Gross misconduct and Failure in Duty of Care and Failure in Duty of Loyalty to members in allowing the Major Rugby Championship/Major League Rugby to proceed unsanctioned, recognized or organized by USA Rugby. In contravention of USA Rugby By-Law Article (ii) Section 2.2 (i) World Rugby By-Law Section 3, Regulation 2.1.2

9. The legal position, due to said contract above is clear – USA rugby cannot sanction another league. World Rugby by-laws are clear in that all matches must be organized, recognized, or sanctioned by the NGB unless prior written consent is given by both Unions (both unions being the home union – in this case USA Rugby, and World Rugby, the International Governing Body of Rugby). In contravention of USA Rugby By-Law Article (V) Section 5.1, World Rugby By-Law Section 3, Regulation 2.1.2

USA Rugby was not at liberty to provide said permission due to it’s poor judgement in said contract with PRO Rugby. As members of USA Rugby those teams involved are also party to the agreement and therefore subject to its requirements.

As members of USA Rugby and World Rugby it is assumed, legally, that all members have prior knowledge of its bylaws and requirements to adhere to those bylaws. Ignorance is not, in this matter a defense, nor, given the CEO and Chairman’s roles pertaining to governing the NGB, should it be one. World Rugby By-Law 7 Binding Agreement, World Rugby By-Laws Section 3, Regulation 2.1.1

The CEO has privately encouraged Major League Rugby to proceed whilst publicly proclaiming that he wishes to cooperate as per PRO Rugby contract, this is both disingenuous and immoral. The CEO, National Office Staff and MRC/MLR teams are knowingly infringing or allowing infringement on the rights set out in PRO Rugby contract to the owner of the league on the basis that said owner was not good for the game. Nevertheless, we have a contract that we are legally bound by – there was no room to maneuver, the decision was laid out in the contract for us. We are now again open to law suits that could amount to millions of dollars that we, the members will pay. In contravention of USA Rugby By-Law Article (V) Section 5.1 (e)

10. Financial mismanagement – No financial reserves, operating a deficit budget for numerous years. In contravention of USA Rugby By-Law Article (V) Section 5.1 (b), Ted Stevens Act, Section 22052, Eligibility Requirements (a) (2).

11. Conflict of Interest, Financial misconduct – Donations made to USA Rugby Trust by USA Rugby partners, shortly before extensions of deals with said partnerships are announced. USA Rugby staff member salaries paid for by interest groups- Atavus currently pays three National Office staff members’ salaries. In contravention of USA Rugby By-Law Article (V) Section 5.1, Ted Stevens Act, Section 22052 (5) (a) and (c)

12. Gross Misconduct, False advertising. USA Rugby sells coaching courses to its membership that are below standard and unrecognized by World Rugby (Level 300). Player Safety is paramount and yet we are failing to adequately educate our coaching population to a standard that is found acceptable elsewhere in the world. In contravention of USA Rugby By-Law Article (ii) Section 2.2 (g)

13. Financial mismanagement and gross misconduct. The perpetual inability of High Performance Department to remain within or under budget. In contravention of USA Rugby By-Law Article (V) Section 5.1 (b), Ted Stevens Act, Section 22052, Eligibility Requirements (a) (2).

14. Failure in Duty of Care, Misconduct and gross negligence; the complete absence of a strategic plan for almost an entire decade. In contravention of USA Rugby By-Law Article (V) Section 5.1 (a)

15. Ineligible Status as a National Governing Body under USOC By Laws due to financial mismanagement, operational budget deficits, poor business decisions As per Ted Stevens Act, Section 22052, Eligibility Requirements (a) (2).

To the members that may wish to add their names to this Letter of Grievance, as I said at the beginning of my letter, it is with great sadness that I am writing this letter regarding the state of our Union, but I cannot help but feel such a letter is long overdue. Members have waged war in the Court of Public Opinion over many of these issues, the right and wrongs of all discussed and discussed and little to no resolution has been forthcoming.

To the CEO and Chairman, you both have great responsibilities, as the shepherds of our young game here in the US. There is the weight of History, the memory, and the work of those that came before that keeps us grounded. Their mission guides us. There are the struggles of the present and issues that whilst large, are not insurmountable. Lastly there is the future that awaits us. You have failed to live up to those responsibilities and at every opportunity over the last two years to rectify these failings have chosen to act, detrimental to the membership, in ways that have been purely for the benefit of the National office or for outside organizations under the guise of partnerships. The purpose of a union is to serve its membership.

I am not writing this letter of grievance as simple vendetta, because I wish to see anyone lose their job or position, we have no other option but to proceed down this road. Change, so desperately needed, is not forthcoming. This is about acknowledging the mistakes of our past, and our present for that matter and correcting them before they destroy our future. This is about making clear our new beginnings.

We are all allowed to make mistakes, we are all human, but to not admit or acknowledge them only continues the cycle of insanity. We are in serious peril because of decisions that were made before us and by us. We cannot expect others to correct the mistakes that have been made on our behalf. We must deal with them ourselves and the first step to solving a problem is admitting that we have one.

To the Chairman, CEO and Men and Women of the Board, of Congress and the National Office, it is time to own up and stand aside so that we can repair the damage and rebuild. It is time for us to move forward.

Upon reading this you must know that we are at Ground Zero. After today, there will be a New USA Rugby or there will be a New Union.

Resolution of Grievance
1. Immediate resignation of The Chairman of the Board, The Board of Directors, CEO and National Office staff involved or implicated in any of the above listed grievances.
2. Immediate shut down and restructuring of the USA Rugby Congress following by-law amendments restricting conflicts of interest at the Congressional Level, not just Board and National Office Level.
3. Establishing an emergency council to take control of day to day operations and any temporary hires as necessary until permanent replacements for staff can be found. To repopulate the Board of Directors, to reorganize and empower the USA Rugby Congress subject to any amendments and instituting a Conflict of Interest Policy for All Directors, Executives, Congressmen and Congresswomen, Staff and Coaches.
4. Development of a Strategic Plan and Business Plan to be orchestrated by the emergency council.

Michael Fealey
Wow. That grievance is epic in its scope and utterly damning if it's even half true. What a clusterfuck.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: No Pro Rugby for Anyone in 2017?

Post by rowan »

Puja wrote:
rowan wrote:The sequel . . .

On players not getting paid past the end of the season and how it's USAR's fault for breaching the agreement and dooming the league - "If someone sells you a house and then they burn it down, do you continue paying your mortgage? No!" That's actually a great example Doug, but probably not in the way that you think it is - yes, you are still liable for your mortgage and you either have to keep paying it or go bankrupt. Sure, you pursue the person who burned it down, but you don't get to just stop paying a third party.

He is horribly reminiscent of Trump - spinning away when confronted, continually talking over things he doesn't like, claiming to be oppressed and victimised when questions are asked, and brazenly denying anything factual which he doesn't like. I still think he's been undeniably screwed by USAR, but he's certainly no angel and has added his own fuel to the dumpster fire of US rugby.

Puja
Pretty much my own assessment. What a fiasco! I've devoted most of my criticism to US Rugby because that's who we're stuck with as fans of the global game. Schoninger is an entrepreneur and we'd be naive to expect anything more than a spineless opportunist from that sector, but he'll be gone and forgotten as soon as this whole thing is blown over.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 16979
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: No Pro Rugby for Anyone in 2017?

Post by Puja »

rowan wrote:
Puja wrote:
rowan wrote:The sequel . . .

On players not getting paid past the end of the season and how it's USAR's fault for breaching the agreement and dooming the league - "If someone sells you a house and then they burn it down, do you continue paying your mortgage? No!" That's actually a great example Doug, but probably not in the way that you think it is - yes, you are still liable for your mortgage and you either have to keep paying it or go bankrupt. Sure, you pursue the person who burned it down, but you don't get to just stop paying a third party.

He is horribly reminiscent of Trump - spinning away when confronted, continually talking over things he doesn't like, claiming to be oppressed and victimised when questions are asked, and brazenly denying anything factual which he doesn't like. I still think he's been undeniably screwed by USAR, but he's certainly no angel and has added his own fuel to the dumpster fire of US rugby.

Puja
Pretty much my own assessment. What a fiasco! I've devoted most of my criticism to US Rugby because that's who we're stuck with as fans of the global game. Schoninger is an entrepreneur and we'd be naive to expect anything more than a spineless opportunist from that sector, but he'll be gone and forgotten as soon as this whole thing is blown over.
I don't know he'll be forgotten for a while - I think he's going to take USAR to the cleaners when the sanctioning agreement ends and the lawsuits can begin. I don't think there's any question that he a) had a valid contract, sanctioning agreement and exclusivity agreement, and that b) USAR have ignored it entirely in the hope that it will go away. He will get back all the money that he put in and then some and I don't really know what will be left of USAR after he's done that given their current parlous financial situation.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: No Pro Rugby for Anyone in 2017?

Post by rowan »

Puja wrote:
rowan wrote:
Puja wrote:
On players not getting paid past the end of the season and how it's USAR's fault for breaching the agreement and dooming the league - "If someone sells you a house and then they burn it down, do you continue paying your mortgage? No!" That's actually a great example Doug, but probably not in the way that you think it is - yes, you are still liable for your mortgage and you either have to keep paying it or go bankrupt. Sure, you pursue the person who burned it down, but you don't get to just stop paying a third party.

He is horribly reminiscent of Trump - spinning away when confronted, continually talking over things he doesn't like, claiming to be oppressed and victimised when questions are asked, and brazenly denying anything factual which he doesn't like. I still think he's been undeniably screwed by USAR, but he's certainly no angel and has added his own fuel to the dumpster fire of US rugby.

Puja
Pretty much my own assessment. What a fiasco! I've devoted most of my criticism to US Rugby because that's who we're stuck with as fans of the global game. Schoninger is an entrepreneur and we'd be naive to expect anything more than a spineless opportunist from that sector, but he'll be gone and forgotten as soon as this whole thing is blown over.
I don't know he'll be forgotten for a while - I think he's going to take USAR to the cleaners when the sanctioning agreement ends and the lawsuits can begin. I don't think there's any question that he a) had a valid contract, sanctioning agreement and exclusivity agreement, and that b) USAR have ignored it entirely in the hope that it will go away. He will get back all the money that he put in and then some and I don't really know what will be left of USAR after he's done that given their current parlous financial situation.

Puja
World Rugby will bail them out, surely. If they could expand the World Cup from 16 to 20 teams just to make sure the US didn't miss out on qualifying again, it's a safe bet they'll come to USAR's rescue here if required. But I imagine this will set back America's plans to establish a professional league - and withal their prospects of hosting the RWC - any time in the foreseeable future.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
Post Reply