Team for France
Moderator: OptimisticJock
-
- Posts: 2968
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm
Team for France
Thought Id start a new thread for this. Personally the only change I would make (injury permitting) is Ford for Brown. Just don't want to lose it on the scrums early on and Brown can offer a lot off the bench.
The only other player who I thought looked a bit off was Jones but I dont think that's surprising having not played for months. Don't think itd make much sense to then drop him when he might get some sharpness back.
Id be tempted by Barclay too but think all the backrow were decent.
Need to keep the good things but just make sure we keep the intensity up. I think our plan in defence was to be uber aggressive and fly up which explains most of the missed tackles but we need to make a few more first up as come the second half the cover wont be there.
Edit: oh and maybe reid for dell
The only other player who I thought looked a bit off was Jones but I dont think that's surprising having not played for months. Don't think itd make much sense to then drop him when he might get some sharpness back.
Id be tempted by Barclay too but think all the backrow were decent.
Need to keep the good things but just make sure we keep the intensity up. I think our plan in defence was to be uber aggressive and fly up which explains most of the missed tackles but we need to make a few more first up as come the second half the cover wont be there.
Edit: oh and maybe reid for dell
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: Team for France
We have to try match their physicality while making them run a lot. They are big guys and even Picamoles gets tired after a while.
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:26 pm
Re: Team for France
Im tempted to go same again, although Reid and Ford have good shouts. Only 6 scrums on Sat so if we can keep the mistakes down then Dell brings more elsewhere on the pitch.
Keep Watson - he was brilliant and its great that we have someone with the nous of Barclay to come on if we are up going in to the last quarter.
Keep Watson - he was brilliant and its great that we have someone with the nous of Barclay to come on if we are up going in to the last quarter.
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: Team for France
A few decent lines by Scott could be the Key to unlocking their defence. The French middlefield partnership did not play well together last week. Especially Fickou. Wonder what they will put up? If they don't change the partnership, there is something to be seized there.
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: Team for France
1. Dell
2. Ford
3. Z. Fargerson.( a beast in the making)
4. Gray
5. Gray
6. Wilson
7.Watson
8. Strauss (for ball carrying, I wouldn't mind CDP, but this is probably not the time for tests)
9. Laidlaw
10. Russel
11. Maitland
12. Dunbar
13. Scott
14. Seymour
15. Hogg
16. Brown
17. Reid
18. Welsh
19. Swinson
20. Barclay
21. Price
22. Weir
23. Jones
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
2. Ford
3. Z. Fargerson.( a beast in the making)
4. Gray
5. Gray
6. Wilson
7.Watson
8. Strauss (for ball carrying, I wouldn't mind CDP, but this is probably not the time for tests)
9. Laidlaw
10. Russel
11. Maitland
12. Dunbar
13. Scott
14. Seymour
15. Hogg
16. Brown
17. Reid
18. Welsh
19. Swinson
20. Barclay
21. Price
22. Weir
23. Jones
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
- General Zod
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:32 pm
Re: Team for France
I'd probably keep the same team, although would be tempted to swap Dell/Reid. Ford played well (they pretty much all did), but I think their scrum will cause us problems anyway, so a hooker that can get the ball out quickly would be preferable. Even then, the scrum got better after ford came on, so I've no idea really what the whole issue was about. Probably squinty driving and not being able to combat it.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Team for France
Reid
Ford
Fagerson
Gray
Gray
Wilson
Watson
Strauss
Laidlaw
Russell
Maitland
Dunbar
Jones
Seymour
Hogg
Brown
Dell
Welsh
Swinson
Barclay
Price
Weir
Bennett
A mix of what I'd like and what will happen.
Realistically Ford will be the only change. Vern does not rate Gordon. The fact that Berghan didn't get on the pitch is telling, Welsh needs to move onto the bench. We know what he offers. Rest of them pick themselves.
Ford
Fagerson
Gray
Gray
Wilson
Watson
Strauss
Laidlaw
Russell
Maitland
Dunbar
Jones
Seymour
Hogg
Brown
Dell
Welsh
Swinson
Barclay
Price
Weir
Bennett
A mix of what I'd like and what will happen.
Realistically Ford will be the only change. Vern does not rate Gordon. The fact that Berghan didn't get on the pitch is telling, Welsh needs to move onto the bench. We know what he offers. Rest of them pick themselves.
-
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Team for France
France are going to have a fair bit of the ball and will send big runners in hard around the edges. Knock them back consistently and were half way there. I'd love to have a Jason white type figure for this game but we don't really have that sort of player in the squad.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Team for France
Ireland were being knocked back/tackled behind the gain line on the regular in the first half. They're more than capable.switchskier wrote:France are going to have a fair bit of the ball and will send big runners in hard around the edges. Knock them back consistently and were half way there. I'd love to have a Jason white type figure for this game but we don't really have that sort of player in the squad.
-
- Posts: 12041
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Team for France
Ireland have got some very good carriers but the sheer mass of the French forwards will be a handful.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Ireland were being knocked back/tackled behind the gain line on the regular in the first half. They're more than capable.switchskier wrote:France are going to have a fair bit of the ball and will send big runners in hard around the edges. Knock them back consistently and were half way there. I'd love to have a Jason white type figure for this game but we don't really have that sort of player in the squad.
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: Team for France
Mikey Brown wrote:Ireland have got some very good carriers but the sheer mass of the French forwards will be a handful.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Ireland were being knocked back/tackled behind the gain line on the regular in the first half. They're more than capable.switchskier wrote:France are going to have a fair bit of the ball and will send big runners in hard around the edges. Knock them back consistently and were half way there. I'd love to have a Jason white type figure for this game but we don't really have that sort of player in the squad.
You are right... We are not worthy of victory. Our Players should be happy to be allowed to get a free trip to the Paris suburbs.
-
- Posts: 12041
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Team for France
Thank god you were able to read between the lines there.
-
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Team for France
Think France will be more challenging than Ireland for us, there not a better team but their willingness to play 2 men out and offload will give us issues.
But
If we can get in their faces and make them more interested in smashing us then winning I think it's their, the French are a blurb weapon right now and a lot goes through their 8 and 9. We control picamoles and Connor Murray the 9 I think it could be a close game.
But
If we can get in their faces and make them more interested in smashing us then winning I think it's their, the French are a blurb weapon right now and a lot goes through their 8 and 9. We control picamoles and Connor Murray the 9 I think it could be a close game.
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: Team for France
You mean Serin? he is a very interesting player, a bit in the Price Mould.whatisthejava wrote:Think France will be more challenging than Ireland for us, there not a better team but their willingness to play 2 men out and offload will give us issues.
But
If we can get in their faces and make them more interested in smashing us then winning I think it's their, the French are a blurb weapon right now and a lot goes through their 8 and 9. We control picamoles and Connor Murray the 9 I think it could be a close game.
Anyway, if time has taught me anything is that Scotland lack Consistency. France will be fired up after their defeat to England. We will play alright but lose by a Score. As per usual. We are not worthy... humble...humble...
Last edited by Adder on Tue Feb 07, 2017 8:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: Team for France
Not easy, because what you said could be true.Mikey Brown wrote:Thank god you were able to read between the lines there.
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:26 pm
Re: Team for France
Two week break after the game so hopefully the boys get some time out to climb le Tour, dine well and generally see the sights so that they can at least take something from the weekend.
- Donny osmond
- Posts: 3215
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: RE: Re: Team for France
Dont be such a dick, he made a perfectly valid point.Adder wrote:Mikey Brown wrote:Ireland have got some very good carriers but the sheer mass of the French forwards will be a handful.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Ireland were being knocked back/tackled behind the gain line on the regular in the first half. They're more than capable.
You are right... We are not worthy of victory. Our Players should be happy to be allowed to get a free trip to the Paris suburbs.
As to Scottish team, I would bring Barclay in for Wilson, whom I've never been an admirer of (altho he did very well on Saturday). Obv Laidlaw will be retained, which if he plays like he did in the first half against Ireland will be exactly what we need, but if he slows up like he did in the 2nd half will be crap.
Biggest concern is our scrum, particularly the front row which has not been up to standard the last few years. I dont mind them not pushing the opposition backwards, as long as they dont get pushed back themselves.
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Team for France
??? ... I do what I want!Donny osmond wrote:Dont be such a dick, he made a perfectly valid point.Adder wrote:Mikey Brown wrote:
Ireland have got some very good carriers but the sheer mass of the French forwards will be a handful.
You are right... We are not worthy of victory. Our Players should be happy to be allowed to get a free trip to the Paris suburbs.
As to Scottish team, I would bring Barclay in for Wilson, whom I've never been an admirer of (altho he did very well on Saturday). Obv Laidlaw will be retained, which if he plays like he did in the first half against Ireland will be exactly what we need, but if he slows up like he did in the 2nd half will be crap.
Biggest concern is our scrum, particularly the front row which has not been up to standard the last few years. I dont mind them not pushing the opposition backwards, as long as they dont get pushed back themselves.
PS: I really don't know how to read this?
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
Last edited by Adder on Tue Feb 07, 2017 10:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: RE: Re: Team for France
Maybe they will get to see the sun as well.ARM wrote:Two week break after the game so hopefully the boys get some time out to climb le Tour, dine well and generally see the sights so that they can at least take something from the weekend.
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: Team for France
Do you mean the standard of the last few years? Or that our scrum hasn't been good for a few years?Donny osmond wrote:
Biggest concern is our scrum, particularly the front row which has not been up to standard the last few years. I dont mind them not pushing the opposition backwards, as long as they dont get pushed back themselves.
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:26 pm
Re: RE: Re: Team for France
Donny, time of the month?Donny osmond wrote:Dont be such a dick, he made a perfectly valid point.Adder wrote:Mikey Brown wrote:
Ireland have got some very good carriers but the sheer mass of the French forwards will be a handful.
You are right... We are not worthy of victory. Our Players should be happy to be allowed to get a free trip to the Paris suburbs.
As to Scottish team, I would bring Barclay in for Wilson, whom I've never been an admirer of (altho he did very well on Saturday). Obv Laidlaw will be retained, which if he plays like he did in the first half against Ireland will be exactly what we need, but if he slows up like he did in the 2nd half will be crap.
Biggest concern is our scrum, particularly the front row which has not been up to standard the last few years. I dont mind them not pushing the opposition backwards, as long as they dont get pushed back themselves.
I'm pretty sure Adder is just continuing his mockers appeasement that he employed pre-ireland.
-
- Posts: 2297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Team for France
We've been consistently rubbish for long stretches of time.Adder wrote:You mean Serin? he is a very interesting player, a bit in the Price Mould.whatisthejava wrote:Think France will be more challenging than Ireland for us, there not a better team but their willingness to play 2 men out and offload will give us issues.
But
If we can get in their faces and make them more interested in smashing us then winning I think it's their, the French are a blurb weapon right now and a lot goes through their 8 and 9. We control picamoles and Connor Murray the 9 I think it could be a close game.
Anyway, if time has taught me anything is that Scotland lack Consistency. France will be fired up after their defeat to England. We will play alright but lose by a Score. As per usual. We are not worthy... humble...humble...
- Donny osmond
- Posts: 3215
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: Team for France
I was thinking that our front row hasnt been good enough for the last few years.
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
-
- Posts: 12041
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Team for France
I'd be tempted by all of Reid, Ford, Barclay (for Wilson) and Scott (for Jones) but I wouldn't like to change all of them.
-
- Posts: 12041
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Team for France
Though holding on to some of our pacier guys like Watson and Jones/Bennet on the bench may be a viable tactic. We don't want to wrestle with them but they'll take some grinding down no matter what.