Ashton’s coming home
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:38 pm
You know, I don't think I can agree with this. May I inquire why?Puja wrote:Another good result for our selection policies. Not sure whether he's needed for England when everyone's fit, but I'd far rather have him than Brown on the wing!
Puja
He's an excellent finisher, has a very good sense of positioning to get himself in the right place at the right time and has got a nice turn of pace. His defence isn't brilliant, but he's not a Campese style swinging door. People might occasionally run over him, but he doesn't often get run round - given how narrow our defence is, I think that'd be preferable to the front-on solidity of Brown.Peat wrote:You know, I don't think I can agree with this. May I inquire why?Puja wrote:Another good result for our selection policies. Not sure whether he's needed for England when everyone's fit, but I'd far rather have him than Brown on the wing!
Puja
Or, to put it another way, what does Ashton bring other than the ability to run nice lines at an acceptable speed and comedically bad tackling?
He spent 4 years pretty consistently failing to do that job.Puja wrote:He's an excellent finisher, has a very good sense of positioning to get himself in the right place at the right time and has got a nice turn of pace. His defence isn't brilliant, but he's not a Campese style swinging door. People might occasionally run over him, but he doesn't often get run round - given how narrow our defence is, I think that'd be preferable to the front-on solidity of Brown.Peat wrote:You know, I don't think I can agree with this. May I inquire why?Puja wrote:Another good result for our selection policies. Not sure whether he's needed for England when everyone's fit, but I'd far rather have him than Brown on the wing!
Puja
Or, to put it another way, what does Ashton bring other than the ability to run nice lines at an acceptable speed and comedically bad tackling?
I think he's underrated by people on here (if overrated by the media/himself) - he's very far from world class, but he could do a job.
Puja
Really though? As I recall, his initial international career from 2010-2012 was very successful and he was running at just under a try a game (despite playing outside the likes of Shontayne Hape). He then earned the ire of the board by continually getting picked without form for 12-13 and 13-14.Peat wrote:He spent 4 years pretty consistently failing to do that job.Puja wrote:He's an excellent finisher, has a very good sense of positioning to get himself in the right place at the right time and has got a nice turn of pace. His defence isn't brilliant, but he's not a Campese style swinging door. People might occasionally run over him, but he doesn't often get run round - given how narrow our defence is, I think that'd be preferable to the front-on solidity of Brown.Peat wrote:
You know, I don't think I can agree with this. May I inquire why?
Or, to put it another way, what does Ashton bring other than the ability to run nice lines at an acceptable speed and comedically bad tackling?
I think he's underrated by people on here (if overrated by the media/himself) - he's very far from world class, but he could do a job.
Puja
He finishes and that's it. I dislike Brown as an England winger quite intensely because he's not quick enough, but Ashton is just not good enough at anything other than getting into position to finish off tries. Neither's an international winger.
Post World Cup he had 4 tries in 21 games. Up to the World Cup he was good (although Raggs' caveat about who he scored his tries against is a good one), post it he was bad. I was wrong about 4 years because I thought his career went on longer than it did - but post World Cup, he was crap.Puja wrote:Really though? As I recall, his initial international career from 2010-2012 was very successful and he was running at just under a try a game (despite playing outside the likes of Shontayne Hape). He then earned the ire of the board by continually getting picked without form for 12-13 and 13-14.Peat wrote:He spent 4 years pretty consistently failing to do that job.Puja wrote:
He's an excellent finisher, has a very good sense of positioning to get himself in the right place at the right time and has got a nice turn of pace. His defence isn't brilliant, but he's not a Campese style swinging door. People might occasionally run over him, but he doesn't often get run round - given how narrow our defence is, I think that'd be preferable to the front-on solidity of Brown.
I think he's underrated by people on here (if overrated by the media/himself) - he's very far from world class, but he could do a job.
Puja
He finishes and that's it. I dislike Brown as an England winger quite intensely because he's not quick enough, but Ashton is just not good enough at anything other than getting into position to finish off tries. Neither's an international winger.
So I'll give you 2 years of failing to do the job, but he has been a success as an international winger before and to say "He just finishes and gets in position to score trie" is skimming over the fact where those are pretty important things for a winger to do.
Anyway, I think we can all agree that he's better than both Solomona and Earle, so he would be on this tour if available.
Puja
I expect that if Solomona can improve his defence from comical to merely crap then we'll have a player who's a better player already than the current version of Ashton. If he can then improve to meh then I'd like a proper look at him in an Eng shirt. He may well be a contender post 2019 WC.Peat wrote:
And I'm not sure he is better than Solomona. At least Solomona can make his own tries.
Ashton is better than Earle, I'll give you that. At this stage, he's better than Cokaganisa, too. But Daly, Watson, May, Nowell, Yarde and Solomona are all better than he is.Scrumhead wrote:I think Ashton is being judged pretty harshly here. I would agree that he needs a team playing to his strengths to get the best out of him, but you could say the same about plenty of less prolific wingers.
Whether we like it or not, Wade isn’t in the conversation so that leaves our wingers as:
Daly
Watson
May
Nowell
Solomona
Earle
Yarde
Where Ashton would fit in to that list is harder to say, but personally I think he’s better than a few of those.
As a direct comparison, Solomona is a quicker, more explosive and is a natural finisher. That said, Ashton is a proven try scorer at test level and Solomona has a bit a way to go to prove himself as a test player. Solomona will quite possibly end up as the better player but if I had to pick one of them to start a test tomorrow, I’d go for Ashton.
I think a lot of people clamouring for Wade ignore that he also needs a team playing to his strengths to get the best out of him. In fact, I'd argue he also needs a game playing to his strengths - if he's cut off, then he contributes nothing to a side. It's why I've stopped calling for his selection for England - we just can't afford to carry a passenger if the game doesn't suit him.Scrumhead wrote:I think Ashton is being judged pretty harshly here. I would agree that he needs a team playing to his strengths to get the best out of him, but you could say the same about plenty of less prolific wingers.
Whether we like it or not, Wade isn’t in the conversation...
A generous label for a man who managed 1 every 5 over his last three years as an international. May, Watson, Daly, Yarde and Nowell all run hotter than 1 in 3. And I don't think its all that harsh to say that when a player stops doing something at international level for two years, the proof is no longer there that they can do it, particularly in a position like wing where players regularly have hot spurts then stop looking like internationals.Scrumhead wrote:That said, Ashton is a proven try scorer at test level and Solomona has a bit a way to go to prove himself as a test player.
Agreed. I think Lewington could do very well at Sarries. Whether that puts him in the mix for England pre-World Cup is debatable but a couple of good, injury free seasons with Sarries could put him on the radar for sure.twitchy wrote:It will be interesting to see how cokansiga goes in a non relegation side. Also I can't imagine lewington not racking up the tries at sarries.
I thought I was pretty clearly comparing Ashton to Solomona.Peat wrote:A generous label for a man who managed 1 every 5 over his last three years as an international. May, Watson, Daly, Yarde and Nowell all run hotter than 1 in 3. And I don't think its all that harsh to say that when a player stops doing something at international level for two years, the proof is no longer there that they can do it, particularly in a position like wing where players regularly have hot spurts then stop looking like internationals.Scrumhead wrote:That said, Ashton is a proven try scorer at test level and Solomona has a bit a way to go to prove himself as a test player.
And I don't think this any of this is harsh. I think it's a fair representation of just how completely ineffectual he was post 2011. Maybe he'd be better than some of the wingers in the England set up - but the guys we're comparing him to, it's like asking whether its better to have a cat or a dog vomit on your shoes. It's a debate you never want to be meaningful.
Might as well hand out recalls to Tom Wood and Alex Goode too.