Page 1 of 1
6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2016 6:52 pm
by Zhivago
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2016 9:59 pm
by Sandydragon
That does seem ludicrous. Some judges seem to be more concerned with the welfare of the offender than the victim.
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 8:30 am
by jared_7
His swimming times were mentioned in most articles talking about the assault. Sounds as though that poor young lady was actually lucky to have such a well-to-do, wealthy, white male - with a promising swimming career ahead of him no less - violently penetrate her while she lay unconscious.
Who here seriously thinks the verdict would have been the same if the name "Brock" was replaced with "Jamal"?
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 8:38 am
by rowan
How about walking free after you burned an entire family to death - including their baby:
http://newcenturytimes.com/2016/06/06/i ... rge-video/
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 8:54 am
by UGagain
And people on this very board support these cunts. People who purport to stand for law and democracy no less.
Zionism is a western sickness.
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 10:55 am
by rowan
Yep, and there are many thousands of Palestinian minors indefinitely interned for such heinous crimes as throwing stones, joining a long line of disenfranchised native peoples with alarmingly high incarceration rates. The Aborigines are imprisoned today at a higher rate than non-white South Africans were during the Apartheid era, Native Americans have higher incarceration rates even than African Americans, and Maori comprise more than half New Zealand's prison population despite being only 14% of the national population:
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/featur ... 50239.html
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:11 pm
by Zhivago
Fuck off guys, not every thread should be about Zionism.
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:28 pm
by Sandydragon
Zhivago wrote:Fuck off guys, not every thread should be about Zionism.
Agreed. Don't hijack every damn thread, there are plenty which already cover Zionism.
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:31 pm
by rowan
Well, this is connected, since we are actually talking about ludicrous prison sentences. This female sex offender got off completely by escaping to guess where...
http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/middle-eas ... -in-Israel
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:11 pm
by Sandydragon
Connected examples is fine. But don't divert the thread completely off topic. this is not a thread about Zionism.
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:34 pm
by Lizard
Can Hammy set up a specific Zionism board perhaps so we all know which threads we can derail into that subject area?
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:15 am
by rowan
Already been done - Zhivago's 'Anti-Zionism' thread.
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 10:01 pm
by cashead
rowan wrote:Already been done - Zhivago's 'Anti-Zionism' thread.
Then don't derail other threads with that shit, for fuck's sake.
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 10:59 pm
by rowan
By commenting on the ridiculous severity and lenience of other prison sentences elsewhere, you mean? It's a thread about a ridiculously lenient prison sentence. So what are the confines within which we are required to operate here?
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:32 pm
by cashead
rowan wrote:By commenting on the ridiculous severity and lenience of other prison sentences elsewhere, you mean? It's a thread about a ridiculously lenient prison sentence. So what are the confines within which we are required to operate here?
So what's the ongoing situation between Israel and Palestine got to do with the wider issues surrounding the Stanford rape trial? Besides fuck all, I mean.
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2016 12:36 am
by rowan
Cashead, calm down & stop preaching. The situation between Israel and Palestine hasn't actually been discussed on this thread. My reference was to the excessive imprisonment of native peoples in Palestine, the US, Australia and New Zealand, compared to ridiculously lenient sentences for others. That's very different. The point almost everybody seems to be making about this ridiculously lenient rape sentence is that it woiuldn't have been possible were the perpetrator not white. Hence the contrasting examples. Oh, and the other case I mentioned was about an Australian female sex offender who escapes to Israel, where she has yet to be charged, I believe. Nothing to do with the Palestinian conflict at all.
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2016 12:56 am
by cashead
Go on, pull the other one.
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:19 am
by Lizard
In what sense are Arab Palestinians "native"? I'm pretty sure that their Arab tribes would have displaced whoever was there before, Canaanites or Phoenicians or Hittites or whatever.
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2016 8:03 am
by rowan
Arabs originated in the Arabian peninsula, as did the Jews, who were ethnically akin to Arabs (separated only by religion). Hittites were native to Turkey, Phoenicians to what is today Lebanon. Palestinians, with good reason, claim descendency from the Canaanites; and certainly this hasn't been disproved. & even if that were not the case; it would be like saying the English are not native to the British Isles because the Celts were there before the Anglos and Saxons (and somebody else was there before the Celts too, by the way) or that the Spanish are not native to the Iberian pensinsula because they are mostly the descendents of Roman, Germanic and Moorish occupations. What is for certain is that the region has been populated by Arabs as far back as recorded history takes us, and that the overwhelming majority have been Muslim since the advent of Islam.
- Just to answer the question, of course.
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 6:01 pm
by rowan
A little bit of good news anyway:
The California judge who issued what critics called a lenient sentence to a former Stanford University swimmer convicted of sexual assault has been removed from hearing an unrelated sexual assault case.
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/ ... ium=social
Re: 6 months??? Pathetic.
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 7:58 pm
by Sandydragon
rowan wrote:A little bit of good news anyway:
The California judge who issued what critics called a lenient sentence to a former Stanford University swimmer convicted of sexual assault has been removed from hearing an unrelated sexual assault case.
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/ ... ium=social
Good.
I had heard somewhere that the swimmer was appealing. One can only hope his sentence is increase (assuming US courts can do that).