RugbyRebels

Seems to me that it is.

There ain't nothin' goin' on here.

Well, debate is impossible, discussion is nearly impossible, unless you're a uk/us hating polemicist, your dissenting views are not tolerated, everything is framed in terms of either you agree with the smug self satisfaction of pseudointellectual uber cynics, or you're some evil selfish Tory apologist.

Its just all a bit pointlessly tiresome. Folk just don't want every feckin discussion dragged into a dick swinging contest about who can be the most despairing nihilist about the modern world.

Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

If Jesus was alive today , would he be a forward or a back ?


Serious question .



Discuss .

Discreet Hooker wrote:If Jesus was alive today , would he be a forward or a back ?

And the answer is - Sam Burgess

UGagain wrote:Seems to me that it is.

There ain't nothin' goin' on here.

No, you're just largely irrelevant.

However, if you refuse to allow discussion to take place; you won't see much discussion.

Discreet Hooker wrote:If Jesus was alive today , would he be a forward or a back ?


Serious question .



Discuss .

Gareth Edwards.

Donny osmond wrote:Well, debate is impossible, discussion is nearly impossible, unless you're a uk/us hating polemicist, your dissenting views are not tolerated, everything is framed in terms of either you agree with the smug self satisfaction of pseudointellectual uber cynics, or you're some evil selfish Tory apologist.

Its just all a bit pointlessly tiresome. Folk just don't want every feckin discussion dragged into a dick swinging contest about who can be the most despairing nihilist about the modern world.

Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

Oh well, if you see the world in those terms, I guess any discussion is going to offend you. The alternative would be to argue your corner I'd have thought.

I wish you and the incredibly relevant Mr Tyler every success in making RR the spectacularly vibrant forum of total agreement that you want.

Good luck.

Which Tyler wrote:

Discreet Hooker wrote:If Jesus was alive today , would he be a forward or a back ?

And the answer is - Sam Burgess

UGagain wrote:Seems to me that it is.

There ain't nothin' goin' on here.

No, you're just largely irrelevant.

However, if you refuse to allow discussion to take place; you won't see much discussion.

Right, by trying to get discussion going I'm impeding discussion.

Gotcha.

Discreet Hooker wrote:If Jesus was alive today , would he be a forward or a back ?


Serious question .



Discuss .

FFS, here we are trying to get UG to stop turning every thread into a discussion of Zionism and you go and mention a radical Palestinian Jew.

In any case, it's obvious that the long haired, sandal wearing, wine drinker was an outside back. His Dad is on the Judiciary* and the Holy Ghost is basically the TMO.

*He also moonlights under his alias Allah as a really old-school "dark arts" coach.

Lizard wrote: FFS, here we are trying to get UG to stop turning every thread into a discussion of Zionism

I've turned a total of 0 threads that way.

Same bullshit as the last time.

C'mon UG, turn that sense of humour dial of yours all the way up to 1...

Tell us what position you think Jebus would play?

Lizard wrote:C'mon UG, turn that sense of humour dial of yours all the way up to 1...

Tell us what position you think Jebus would play?

He doesn't do rugby.

What is a nation?!?! That's the REALLY important question that needs answering!

The clue is in the first R.

UGagain wrote:

Lizard wrote: FFS, here we are trying to get UG to stop turning every thread into a discussion of Zionism

I've turned a total of 0 threads that way.

Same bullshit as the last time.

Maybe not, I doubt anyone's kept count, but you sure as fuck contribute to it here.

You don't think your behaviour is contributing to RR being, by your views "dead?" It's not a coincidence that lengthy discussion in this subforum dried up as soon as you turned up and acted like an insufferable fuckarse whenever someone doesn't agree entirely with your myopic views, you bombastic shit.

Jesus was a Capricorn and Full Back. All great full backs are Capricorn. Astrology innit? Can't argue with the stars.

Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

Donny osmond wrote:Jesus was a Capricorn and Full Back. All great full backs are Capricorn. Astrology innit? Can't argue with the stars.

Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

Ben Smith?

cashead wrote:

Donny osmond wrote:Jesus was a Capricorn and Full Back. All great full backs are Capricorn. Astrology innit? Can't argue with the stars.

Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

Ben Smith?

I really don't carry the birthdays/star signs of all the full backs around with me. I was just thinking about himself and me.

Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

Donny osmond wrote:

cashead wrote:

Donny osmond wrote:Jesus was a Capricorn and Full Back. All great full backs are Capricorn. Astrology innit? Can't argue with the stars.

Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

Ben Smith?

I really don't carry the birthdays/star signs of all the full backs around with me. I was just thinking about himself and me.

Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

Maybe you should, you zionist scum. Up your "fullbacks' birthdays" game, it's shit!

Fkit ! Bloke with a trim beard and flowing locks just gotta be a back . Would play well on a flooded pitch or even ice . Popular in the clubhouse turning water into your favourite bitter (he don't normally do bitter ) & leading a few good old singsong . Don't mention Wonga tho' , bit testy about money lenders .

cashead wrote:

Donny osmond wrote:

cashead wrote: Ben Smith?

I really don't carry the birthdays/star signs of all the full backs around with me. I was just thinking about himself and me.

Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

Maybe you should, you zionist scum. Up your "fullbacks' birthdays" game, it's shit!

You know-nothing mouth breathing useful idiot, with your straw men arguments that serve only to demonstrate your lack of understanding. I'm outraged about something, which makes me twice as good a person as you!!

Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

Surely Jebus was league man? 12 disciples that did what he told them to do, sounds like a scrum-half to me.

RR The Inferno Politics and stuff is comatose, and it's not waking up.

Zhivago wrote:RR The Inferno Politics and stuff is comatose, and it's not waking up.

We are saving it all up for the day Shillary Clinton to go to prison.

Donny osmond wrote:Jesus was a Capricorn and Full Back. All great full backs are Capricorn. Astrology innit? Can't argue with the stars.

Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

This is about the only sane international rugby forum on the net. The others are dominated by rednecks.