#BLM
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 11:46 am
I'm trying like real hard to care that some Texan cops got shot. But my brain keeps saying, "yep, that seems fair."
Try harder then mate. It's a fucking appallingly tragic sequence of events.Lizard wrote:I'm trying like real hard to care that some Texan cops got shot. But my brain keeps saying, "yep, that seems fair."
Nah mate. They joined the polis so fuck them apparently.Edinburgh in Exile wrote:Try harder then mate. It's a fucking appallingly tragic sequence of events.Lizard wrote:I'm trying like real hard to care that some Texan cops got shot. But my brain keeps saying, "yep, that seems fair."
How can you be so blasé about it?Lizard wrote:Texas specifically prides itself on allowing its citizens to arm themselves including against excesses of executive power. Those that join an armed, executive enforcement body are choosing to put themselves in harm's way.
I agree it's terrible that some probably perfectly nice guys got killed but given the faults in the system they were sworn to uphold, and chose to join, I'm just not all that sympathetic.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-34996604Lizard wrote: I haven't checked the numbers but I suspect that armed police cause more deaths in the states than mass shootings and terrorism combined.
I'm not enjoying your wholesale generalisations Lizard, nor your seeming eagerness to point out your ambivalence. Each to their own I guess.Lizard wrote:Texas specifically prides itself on allowing its citizens to arm themselves including against excesses of executive power. Those that join an armed, executive enforcement body are choosing to put themselves in harm's way.
I agree it's terrible that some probably perfectly nice guys got killed but given the faults in the system they were sworn to uphold, and chose to join, I'm just not all that sympathetic.
Thats a bit like suggesting that as crime figures suggest most crime is committed by black youths, if they get shot then its too bad. I think its easy to point out the flaws in the organization whilst still considering the human factor.Lizard wrote:Texas specifically prides itself on allowing its citizens to arm themselves including against excesses of executive power. Those that join an armed, executive enforcement body are choosing to put themselves in harm's way.
I agree it's terrible that some probably perfectly nice guys got killed but given the faults in the system they were sworn to uphold, and chose to join, I'm just not all that sympathetic.
Coco wrote:This was an extremely peaceful protest... Which btw is a right we all cherish. It wasn't just Dallas police officers shot, at least one DART officer, and a civilian was targeted as well. (Civilians are not generally armed at peaceful rallies for any of you wondering)
Coco wrote:He was showing he can exercise his right to carry... Peacefully. He did just that.
I think I've seen higher figures for the numbers shot by police with about 500 officers killed in return, but i'm not at all sure.Which Tyler wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-34996604Lizard wrote: I haven't checked the numbers but I suspect that armed police cause more deaths in the states than mass shootings and terrorism combined.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-i ... s-database
In 2015, 1,146 people were killed by the police in the USA
In 2015, 475 people were killed in "mass shootings" in the USA
In 2015, 13,286 people died by "gun violence" in the USA (excl suicide)
The 2nd amendment established the right for a community to arm a militia against an untrusted federal government. Frankly this action cones about as close to embodying the spirit of that amendment as anything I have heard of from America in a long time.caldeyrfc wrote:When a countries law makers can not even decide to allow a 3 day waiting period for people ON FBI watch lists it has to take a step back and say "whoa this is fvcked" America is broken and it will never fix it's self until it realises that the 2nd amendment was good for 200 years a go but now it is just plain stupid
I can't. There is no justice in murder, and the certainly isn't any fairness.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I think I've seen higher figures for the numbers shot by police with about 500 officers killed in return, but i'm not at all sure.Which Tyler wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-34996604Lizard wrote: I haven't checked the numbers but I suspect that armed police cause more deaths in the states than mass shootings and terrorism combined.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-i ... s-database
In 2015, 1,146 people were killed by the police in the USA
In 2015, 475 people were killed in "mass shootings" in the USA
In 2015, 13,286 people died by "gun violence" in the USA (excl suicide)
I can entirely see where Lizard is coming from. In a country where apparently black men can be summarily executed by police officers for DWB with impunity it is not at all difficult to understand a black man deciding to give a bit back and it's pretty hard to condemn. I guess where I depart from Liz is that I have sympathy for the actually loss of life, even if I have difficulty condemning the action that caused it.
Caaaaaaanterburrrrrrrrrrrrycanta_brian wrote:The 2nd amendment established the right for a community to arm a militia against an untrusted federal government. Frankly this action cones about as close to embodying the spirit of that amendment as anything I have heard of from America in a long time.caldeyrfc wrote:When a countries law makers can not even decide to allow a 3 day waiting period for people ON FBI watch lists it has to take a step back and say "whoa this is fvcked" America is broken and it will never fix it's self until it realises that the 2nd amendment was good for 200 years a go but now it is just plain stupid