Early 6N discussion thread
Moderator: OptimisticJock
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
So we're still as wasteful as ever.
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:26 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
So our forwards are still appalling in open play...can’t get over the gain line. Maul offence and scrum have gone to sht.
Still Russell and Johnson have worked well together.
Still Russell and Johnson have worked well together.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
I don't think the maul is that bad but you don't need to try setting them up every 4 seconds from open play or the halfway line.ARM wrote:So our forwards are still appalling in open play...can’t get over the gain line. Maul offence and scrum have gone to sht.
Still Russell and Johnson have worked well together.
It's absolutely shocking we only have only got 12 points on the board - reverse the possession and territory in the second half and we're staring down the barrel of a loss. We never seem to be able to make this dominance count.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
That's def a yellow for Stu Mac.
- General Zod
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:32 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
Was about to type that, given the early change, Wilson has played ok. Then he did that 5 metres out!
You tell him Grieg! Am glad he’s mentioned the Italians playing our men off the ball - they’ve been at it all day. If we get another offensive 5 metre line-out, they’re just targeting McInally before he even gets the ball.
You tell him Grieg! Am glad he’s mentioned the Italians playing our men off the ball - they’ve been at it all day. If we get another offensive 5 metre line-out, they’re just targeting McInally before he even gets the ball.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
Welp. Lucky that didn't result in a closer look...
- General Zod
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:32 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
I think he got that...
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
Ref is really poor. That pass to turncoat Tam to clear was definitely forward.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
What a beautiful line from Seymour. Please don't screw it up...
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
Uhh... Did Hogg actually touch that? Linesman is absolutely ADAMANT.
I'd be raging if that was given against us without a TMO look.
I'd be raging if that was given against us without a TMO look.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
Ok fair play to the linesman - that's legit.
Shout out to Tommy for not giving a dumbass offload like his compatriots when it clearly wasn't on, did another roll ready to recycle and popped it when it WAS on. H Jones take note...
Shout out to Tommy for not giving a dumbass offload like his compatriots when it clearly wasn't on, did another roll ready to recycle and popped it when it WAS on. H Jones take note...
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
Ritchie has been fairly poor by his own high standards today. Naive to let the italian 9 have a huge gap & has fallen off two tackles already.
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:26 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
Now we’re talking. Getting over the gain line = quick ball. Well played Ritchie and Kinghorn
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
Be quite funny if Toony denies Graham his cap today.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
Is this ref for real? Our first significant infringement in the red zone and we're carded?
-
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
That is harsh.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
Sorry that's never obstruction. The guy pushes Price flying to make a point and milk it. Poor ref.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
Big D wrote:That is harsh.
It was a prop or a hooker - he was never touching Hogg.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
Need to be careful here now...
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:26 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
Sloppy finish but you have to give some credit to Italy.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
What the actual f*ck. Someone better give them a bollocking after the whistle. Completely fallen apart.
-
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
Sloppy but a bit out that has shown promise and a lot to work on. As am immediate post mortem I'll take that.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
BP win job done but we really were not very good over 80 minutes. Any other team besides perhaps France would have likely beaten us today.
-
- Posts: 2257
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
This. I was actually a little disappointed when it was looking like finishing 33-3 after their amount of possession. Ireland will be all over them defending like that.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:What the actual f*ck. Someone better give them a bollocking after the whistle. Completely fallen apart.
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:23 pm
Re: Early 6N discussion thread
Hard to put the finger on that last 10 minutes, tiredness or complacency? Laidlaw was off by that time, and lots of first caps, etc.
I thought Strauss was excellent. Graham looked a bit slow - even with fresh legs.
I thought Strauss was excellent. Graham looked a bit slow - even with fresh legs.