Another gouge
-
- Posts: 1891
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Another gouge
Srsly need a culture change lads
- cashead
- Posts: 3998
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:34 am
Re: Another gouge
Eye-gouging bans should be measured in entire years, second offence should be a life-time ban.
I'm a god
How can you kill a god?
Shame on you, sweet Nerevar
How can you kill a god?
Shame on you, sweet Nerevar
-
- Posts: 12038
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Another gouge
Wow, that was one of the dumbest reds I've ever seen. He wasn't even near the action, or seemingly even particularly upset about it, just felt like having a poke around?
-
- Posts: 1891
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: Another gouge
Completely agreeMikey Brown wrote:Wow, that was one of the dumbest reds I've ever seen. He wasn't even near the action, or seemingly even particularly upset about it, just felt like having a poke around?
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm
- Location: Haute-Garonne
Re: Another gouge
When I saw the incident I thought wtf is the tw@t up to? He must have next to feckall between his ears and should receive a ban for a minimum of 6 months.
- morepork
- Posts: 7520
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Another gouge
That is some seriously cunty behaviour. They are professionals, they are at work, he should be punished so it hits his job hard. What a neanderthal.
Isn't that Ronan O'Gara's team? Has he lost the room or what? They look on a mission to cripple the world through cheap shots.
Isn't that Ronan O'Gara's team? Has he lost the room or what? They look on a mission to cripple the world through cheap shots.
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm
- Location: Haute-Garonne
Re: Another gouge
And all he gets is a 6-week ban!! Jono Gibbes, the la Rochelle manager says that his player Bougarit "didn't mean to hurt" Curry! Balls!!
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Another gouge
The issue for me is why did the La Rochelle hooker, and there's some evidence here I've forgotten his name, only get the entry point sanction for contact with the eye area, when it would seem he could and imo should be getting the entry point sanction for intentional contact with the eye area?
I'm willing to accept that's not a gouge in the sense there wasn't, thankfully, a finger inserted into the eye socket, but that's not a reckless or accidental act, he walked over to do exactly what he did. Or as I've just been ranting to some poor soul, if that's an unintended act from him he's such a menace to society that henceforth he should be required to be placed into a Zorb ball prior to any interaction with others
I'm willing to accept that's not a gouge in the sense there wasn't, thankfully, a finger inserted into the eye socket, but that's not a reckless or accidental act, he walked over to do exactly what he did. Or as I've just been ranting to some poor soul, if that's an unintended act from him he's such a menace to society that henceforth he should be required to be placed into a Zorb ball prior to any interaction with others