Mellsblue wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 12:36 pm
Wherever Martin played in the RWC semi is where he should stay imo. He was immense. Have Chessum/Martin on the bench and have no drop off in quality when the replacement comes on. Plus I’m sick and tired of a lock at 6.
5 it is then
Bugger. Could’ve sworn it was 12 and all our problems were solved
6ft6, 19 stone inside centre. That's certainly one way of shoring up the midfield defence
Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 11:41 am
I really just want to see Martin focus on being a tight-head lock. Let Chessum, Isiekwe and Itoje fight it out over who gets to fanny around pretending to be a flanker if it comes to it.
I think Martin looks fine at 6 tbh- happy to stand corrected by the Tigers gang, but he looks a better 6 than Chessum for intl level. I wouldn't go near Itoje at 6. I'd prefer CCS got the gig though, and interesting that Pearson is playing 6 for the 'a' team.
You are correct in saying that he is a better 6 than Chessum for international level, but that is very much asking the wrong question. If we *have* to play one at 6, then it should be Martin. However, what we should be doing is continuing our exciting new experiment that we're trying of playing a flanker at flanker and having the locks play at lock.
Puja
was merely commenting on mikey sticking chessum in there v martin. If there were an outstandng 6 it wouldnt be a debate- always opposed locks at 6, to the point of being wrong on lawes
Midfield defence just disappeared and then Furbank jumps on the back of an already tackled man instead of doing anything remotely useful. Really poor defence from the backs.