gaza conflict
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Oh my God, a good decision from Lammy:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/artic ... avid-lammy
Disgraceful that the Tories never restored funding, despite everyone except the US doing so.
Well done Lammy, but don't stop there.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/artic ... avid-lammy
Disgraceful that the Tories never restored funding, despite everyone except the US doing so.
Well done Lammy, but don't stop there.
-
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Bella Hadid is anti semite now according to Adidas I notice the Adidas statement doesn't acknowledge her parents were ethnically cleansed from Palestine
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Although there a suggestions that Harris might take a different line than Biden on Gaza, she goes and meets Netanyahu anyway. She's only the VP - couldn't she have made some excuse (she's pretty busy right now) not to meet the genocider?
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9322
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: gaza conflict
What do you want her to do?
Refuse to meet a head of state that she WILL have to talk to, and try to talk around, if she becomes president?
She's also shown more opposition to Israel than Biden, Trump, or... any American presidential candidate since... before I was born, probably?
Refuse to meet a head of state that she WILL have to talk to, and try to talk around, if she becomes president?
She's also shown more opposition to Israel than Biden, Trump, or... any American presidential candidate since... before I was born, probably?
Last edited by Which Tyler on Fri Jul 26, 2024 10:28 am, edited 2 times in total.
- Puja
- Posts: 17793
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: gaza conflict
She has at least spoken words about needing a ceasefire and made noises about concern for civilians. It's an improvement, even if that is a low bar to trip over.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 9:45 am Although there a suggestions that Harris might take a different line than Biden on Gaza, she goes and meets Netanyahu anyway. She's only the VP - couldn't she have made some excuse (she's pretty busy right now) not to meet the genocider?
Puja
Backist Monk
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Yeah, it's a tiny improvement. The 'unswerving support for Israel' remains, as ever. It's like holding a kid down for a bully but saying 'ooh, don't knock all their teeth out'.Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 10:24 amShe has at least spoken words about needing a ceasefire and made noises about concern for civilians. It's an improvement, even if that is a low bar to trip over.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 9:45 am Although there a suggestions that Harris might take a different line than Biden on Gaza, she goes and meets Netanyahu anyway. She's only the VP - couldn't she have made some excuse (she's pretty busy right now) not to meet the genocider?
Puja
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: gaza conflict
This is good from Labour:
https://www.theguardian.com/law/article ... hu-gallant
It's mostly political (the Tories' action was only really likely to delay the arrest warrants?) but it's something.
Better still is the suggestion (at the end) that at least a ban on the sale of 'offensive' weapons is in the pipeline.
https://www.theguardian.com/law/article ... hu-gallant
It's mostly political (the Tories' action was only really likely to delay the arrest warrants?) but it's something.
Better still is the suggestion (at the end) that at least a ban on the sale of 'offensive' weapons is in the pipeline.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Could this perhaps be a hint of double standards, just maybe?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/artic ... hts-attack
It seems that blowing up Arab children in a rocket attack is horrific if you're Hezbollah, not so much if you're Israel, who are doing it most days.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/artic ... le-in-gaza
https://www.theguardian.com/world/artic ... hts-attack
It seems that blowing up Arab children in a rocket attack is horrific if you're Hezbollah, not so much if you're Israel, who are doing it most days.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/artic ... le-in-gaza
-
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: gaza conflict
It's this lack of equivalence between Palestinians that really makes the whole thing so infuriatingSon of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 10:31 am Could this perhaps be a hint of double standards, just maybe?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/artic ... hts-attack
It seems that blowing up Arab children in a rocket attack is horrific if you're Hezbollah, not so much if you're Israel, who are doing it most days.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/artic ... le-in-gaza
Israel could end this whole thing tomorrow but they won't, they'll just continue to ethnically cleanse the west bank and satisfy their ultras
And the west just say go ahead spartan from a few toothless judges and a toothless U.N
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Now delayed. So much for that.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 2:08 pm This is good from Labour:
https://www.theguardian.com/law/article ... hu-gallant
It's mostly political (the Tories' action was only really likely to delay the arrest warrants?) but it's something.
Better still is the suggestion (at the end) that at least a ban on the sale of 'offensive' weapons is in the pipeline.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/artic ... non-crisis
-
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Gaza is nowhere now
"Moderate" leader dead, there'll be no negotiations now until next guy comes in who's likely to be more militant which suits bibi down to the ground
Bibi extends his perpetual war into Lebanon and its a total cluster fuck
The world is basically relying on Qatar to try and resolve this and that's not going to happen
"Moderate" leader dead, there'll be no negotiations now until next guy comes in who's likely to be more militant which suits bibi down to the ground
Bibi extends his perpetual war into Lebanon and its a total cluster fuck
The world is basically relying on Qatar to try and resolve this and that's not going to happen
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: gaza conflict
We're the indifferent* cop, USA is the bad cop, Israel is the psycho cop. We all have our part to play.paddy no 11 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 01, 2024 9:56 am Gaza is nowhere now
"Moderate" leader dead, there'll be no negotiations now until next guy comes in who's likely to be more militant which suits bibi down to the ground
Bibi extends his perpetual war into Lebanon and its a total cluster fuck
The world is basically relying on Qatar to try and resolve this and that's not going to happen
The US could pull the plug at any time. By their actions they show that they're happy with the butchery.
* and that's being generous to Labour who have yet to really prove where they stand, although are substantially continuing the Tories' moderately evil cop role.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Really, how long does it take for lawyers to determine if Israel is committing wars crimes or crimes against humanity? I'm sorry if it costs those amoral bastards at BAE but we need to stop arms sales now.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 7:18 pmNow delayed. So much for that.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 2:08 pm This is good from Labour:
https://www.theguardian.com/law/article ... hu-gallant
It's mostly political (the Tories' action was only really likely to delay the arrest warrants?) but it's something.
Better still is the suggestion (at the end) that at least a ban on the sale of 'offensive' weapons is in the pipeline.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/artic ... non-crisis
https://www.theguardian.com/world/artic ... k-diplomat
-
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Doubtless they'll say hezbollah/Iran are a threat so nothing will change
I'm 45 now, I think if I live to 65 I'll see the complete takeover of the west bank or it'll be reduced to a minor gaza style prison. I'm resigned to this now
I'm 45 now, I think if I live to 65 I'll see the complete takeover of the west bank or it'll be reduced to a minor gaza style prison. I'm resigned to this now
-
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Anyone see channel 4 news tonight, absolutely disturbing
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: gaza conflict
The most moral army in the world. It's disturbing but not surprising.paddy no 11 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 19, 2024 7:18 pm Anyone see channel 4 news tonight, absolutely disturbing
-
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Polio being detected for the 1st time in 25 years in gaza
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Legal advice: there is a real possibility that the UK and individuals in the UK have broken international law due to their assistance of Israel in Gaza and more generally over the occupation of Palestine:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... an-deny-it
https://www.globaljustice.org.uk/wp-con ... F_INAL.pdfthere is a real prospect that the UK and/or
individuals herein have committed breaches of international law (by
vicarious liability).
(1) Re. Israel’s breaches of the prohibitions of acquisition of territory by
aggression and (allegedly) genocide and torture, and the Palestinian
peoples’ right to self-determination: There is a real prospect that the
UK or individuals herein rendered aid which facilitated these wrongs
and alleged wrongs. This, alone, would be sufficient to establish
vicarious liability in international law.
(2) Re. Israel’s alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity: there is
a real prospect that the UK and/or individuals herein rendered aid
and assistance which facilitated the alleged wrongs and had the
requisite knowledge thereof. This would be sufficient to establish
vicarious liability in international law.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... an-deny-it
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: gaza conflict
(I know this has been out for months but) it seems that stories of the worst things that Hamas did on 7th October 2023 were completely fabricated by Israel in order to dehumanise the Palestinians, and naturally they were all eagerly swallowed and repeated by the US and UK and the media. The discovery that they were in fact lies remains ignored by the mainstream press.
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Half expecting Tony Blair to swoop in like the corporate Angel of Death and make a quick buck. How blatantly can a people be shat on?
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Labour suspend 30 out of 350 arms licenses to Israel. Better than nothing. Is it enough? Impossible to judge without seeing the detail but it sounds like the bare minimum they felt they needed to defuse problems at the party conference.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ar ... ter-review
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ar ... ter-review
-
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Into lebannon again, ground invasion on the way
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: gaza conflict
The US could stop it at any time, since they're supplying most of the weapons for it. Therefore they either want it to happen or they're indifferent. As the only superpower it would seem strange for them to let Israel make such big decisions for it, so it's safer to assume they want it to happen. Essentially the US is using Israel to wreck the Middle East ie create mass destruction and death in enemy Muslim countries, presumably for such ends as domination of an oil rich region, weakening Iran, to counter Russia's influence, whatever's trending in the CIA at this time.
- Puja
- Posts: 17793
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: gaza conflict
Bold to assume that the US government has any control here. They may technically have the absolute power to call Israel to heel, but in doing so would guarantee a Republican landslide. Nevermind Trump's braying to the Christian nationalists and fanatics that would follow, just look at the special interest groups and PACS that targetted the reelection campaigns of pro-Palestinian Democratic Senators and destroyed them with funding their opponents, then scale that up nationally.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 25, 2024 11:01 pmThe US could stop it at any time, since they're supplying most of the weapons for it. Therefore they either want it to happen or they're indifferent. As the only superpower it would seem strange for them to let Israel make such big decisions for it, so it's safer to assume they want it to happen. Essentially the US is using Israel to wreck the Middle East ie create mass destruction and death in enemy Muslim countries, presumably for such ends as domination of an oil rich region, weakening Iran, to counter Russia's influence, whatever's trending in the CIA at this time.
Puja
Backist Monk
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: gaza conflict
The US government absolutely has control here. They choose not to exercise the power they have.Puja wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2024 12:22 amBold to assume that the US government has any control here. They may technically have the absolute power to call Israel to heel, but in doing so would guarantee a Republican landslide. Nevermind Trump's braying to the Christian nationalists and fanatics that would follow, just look at the special interest groups and PACS that targetted the reelection campaigns of pro-Palestinian Democratic Senators and destroyed them with funding their opponents, then scale that up nationally.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 25, 2024 11:01 pmThe US could stop it at any time, since they're supplying most of the weapons for it. Therefore they either want it to happen or they're indifferent. As the only superpower it would seem strange for them to let Israel make such big decisions for it, so it's safer to assume they want it to happen. Essentially the US is using Israel to wreck the Middle East ie create mass destruction and death in enemy Muslim countries, presumably for such ends as domination of an oil rich region, weakening Iran, to counter Russia's influence, whatever's trending in the CIA at this time.
Puja
If you give a country billions of dollars worth of weapons habitually, massively increase this in response to that country's use of those weapons then it's reasonable to assume you approve of what that country's doing with them.
I appreciate that today would not be the optimal day for Biden to develop a conscience. It would have been better to have taken an ethically and legally defensible position much earlier. But we are talking about total hypotheticals anyway...
I disagree that opposing Israel's actions at this time would cause a Republican victory , let alone a landslide. Just because an action seems inconceivable does not mean the sky would fall on our heads. Opposing Israel's actions could easily be framed as opposing Netanyahu, effectively about saving Israel from a dangerous man who would drag it into war. He could (again, inconceivable) call the pager attacks what they are, a massive terrorist act, and say that Israel has an out-of-control leader. You may think Netanyahu has power over Biden but imagine how long Netanyahu would last if the Israelis thought he had lost them the support of the US.
And who knows? The voters might actually be impressed with a show of strength.