Might be interesting if Joey Carberry does come to the Prem next season and changes allegiance. Sale seem intent on flogging Ford, who lets face it isn't the best at resting anyway. Would suddenly provide a short term fourth choice option.
Hah - hadn't heard about that as an option. Would be fun, but not exactly a long-term option.
Puja
He's reviewing his options whilst waiting to hear from Bordeaux about a renewal. It's three years from his last cap in November and he's publicly stated he's become EQ.
Bristol and Tigers might be interested.
Definitely a short term option for England but if it buys time for someone else to come through then fine. Would only be fourth choice in any case.
He's got his wires crossed though when he says it'd help him get a Prem contract though - he doesn't qualify as being an EQP as far as the Prem club's payments from the RFU are concerned until/unless Borthwick decides he wants him and the paperwork goes through the IRB.
Danno wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 9:28 pm
NZer via Ireland that can't buy a cap for three years? Nah thanks, I can hear the green boys sniggering already
They liked him enough to give him 38 caps before the last three years where's he been injured or in France.
Re Puja's point. Bristol/Tigers/Chiefs/whomever "Steve we are going to sign a non-EQ flyhalf due to lack of options, we'll go with the one that can be EQ if you waive through his paperwork. Sound good?" Borthwick might never pick him but would prefer to have the option than not. The clubs might kick up a fuss if they bring over potentially EQ options and the RFU decide to fuck about with being picky over which ones count towards their cap, doubly so if they have row back in future when an injury crisis occurs.
Danno wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 9:28 pm
NZer via Ireland that can't buy a cap for three years? Nah thanks, I can hear the green boys sniggering already
They liked him enough to give him 38 caps before the last three years where's he been injured or in France.
Re Puja's point. Bristol/Tigers/Chiefs/whomever "Steve we are going to sign a non-EQ flyhalf due to lack of options, we'll go with the one that can be EQ if you waive through his paperwork. Sound good?" Borthwick might never pick him but would prefer to have the option than not. The clubs might kick up a fuss if they bring over potentially EQ options and the RFU decide to fuck about with being picky over which ones count towards their cap, doubly so if they have row back in future when an injury crisis occurs.
I see your point, but it's the way it's currently set up. Bristol aren't getting paid for Marmion for example. I don't think anyone would do the paperwork just on spec either - costs money and time to do (as the IRB consider all applications to switch nationality individually) and it's non-reversible, so if Carberry came to England, did the IRB paperwork, and then went back to Ireland, he couldn't then return to being Irish qualified again.
Danno wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 9:28 pm
NZer via Ireland that can't buy a cap for three years? Nah thanks, I can hear the green boys sniggering already
Bob on Danno.
If we were talking first choice, then yeah, but we're discussing him as a fourth choice who would be better than Bailey/CAtkinson. I don't think fans of an Irish setup that's capped Addison, Haley, Treadwell, and are currently sniffing around Kelly would have too much to snigger about vis-a-vis bolstering depth via poaching.
Couldn’t care less about the Irish set up. I care about who our fourth choice is. If the best we have is Bailey/Atkinson or a converted Steward then so be it.
p/d wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 12:47 pm
Couldn’t care less about the Irish set up. I care about who our fourth choice is. If the best we have is Bailey/Atkinson or a converted Steward then so be it.
Judging by SB's selections our 4th choice is some combination of Slade and Furbank! Joking aside, it's a half-reasonable benchmark. For example, none of the three you mention are better than either, currently.
I'd also have a 50p bet with anyone that if both Smiths and Ford were injured the fellow starting at 10 would be Farrell. If the scenario was not considered 'exceptional' enough the rules would be re-written overnight. Call me a cynic or the blazers hypocritical - take your choice.
p/d wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 12:47 pm
Couldn’t care less about the Irish set up. I care about who our fourth choice is. If the best we have is Bailey/Atkinson or a converted Steward then so be it.
Judging by SB's selections our 4th choice is some combination of Slade and Furbank! Joking aside, it's a half-reasonable benchmark. For example, none of the three you mention are better than either, currently.
I'd also have a 50p bet with anyone that if both Smiths and Ford were injured the fellow starting at 10 would be Farrell. If the scenario was not considered 'exceptional' enough the rules would be re-written overnight. Call me a cynic or the blazers hypocritical - take your choice.
1) He’s highly unlikely to give up a good salary and a great life in the South of France for the promise of being England’s 4th choice 10.
2) If we really did need to invoke ‘exceptional circumstances’, we’d surely want to call upon someone experienced at test level who could slot in to the set-up quickly, not an uncapped player.
3) Simmonds’ game really dropped off when he became Chiefs’ skipper. It might not be directly relevant but if he struggles with the weight of responsibility, it could suggest he lacks the right mentality to be a test 10 in an emergency scenario.
Obviously we’re talking completely hypothetical scenarios here, but in this situation, I’d probably look at Lozowski at 10. I know he hasn’t done it much recently but at least he spent half his career there.
Scrumhead wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 7:44 am
I always liked Simmonds but a few things …
1) He’s highly unlikely to give up a good salary and a great life in the South of France for the promise of being England’s 4th choice 10.
2) If we really did need to invoke ‘exceptional circumstances’, we’d surely want to call upon someone experienced at test level who could slot in to the set-up quickly, not an uncapped player.
3) Simmonds’ game really dropped off when he became Chiefs’ skipper. It might not be directly relevant but if he struggles with the weight of responsibility, it could suggest he lacks the right mentality to be a test 10 in an emergency scenario.
Obviously we’re talking completely hypothetical scenarios here, but in this situation, I’d probably look at Lozowski at 10. I know he hasn’t done it much recently but at least he spent half his career there.
Wasn't he the youngest captain to win a Champions Cup, getting a man of the match award for the final? I thought it was after that win things started to drift a bit, probably as most of his teammates he'd grown up with were all looking at moving away as well. He seemed to fall out with Baxter as well, there's no way Harvey Skinner was ever playing better.
Yeah I thought Simmonds as captain at 10 was when Exeter were at their peak? Not that I'm attributing that to his captaincy specifically.
Why are we actually discussing this though? In case both Smiths somehow go with the Lions and both Ford/Furbank are injured? Parachuting Farrell back in just sounds like a bad idea in general.
I do wonder if George Ford is sick of these Lions summer tours to Argentina where he temporarily gets the reins.
Scrumhead wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 7:44 am
I always liked Simmonds but a few things …
1) He’s highly unlikely to give up a good salary and a great life in the South of France for the promise of being England’s 4th choice 10.
2) If we really did need to invoke ‘exceptional circumstances’, we’d surely want to call upon someone experienced at test level who could slot in to the set-up quickly, not an uncapped player.
3) Simmonds’ game really dropped off when he became Chiefs’ skipper. It might not be directly relevant but if he struggles with the weight of responsibility, it could suggest he lacks the right mentality to be a test 10 in an emergency scenario.
Obviously we’re talking completely hypothetical scenarios here, but in this situation, I’d probably look at Lozowski at 10. I know he hasn’t done it much recently but at least he spent half his career there.
Wasn't he the youngest captain to win a Champions Cup, getting a man of the match award for the final? I thought it was after that win things started to drift a bit, probably as most of his teammates he'd grown up with were all looking at moving away as well. He seemed to fall out with Baxter as well, there's no way Harvey Skinner was ever playing better.
Yep. Underrated player imo tho his goal kicking went from near 100% to off a cliff when Exeter went into decline… chicken meet egg I guess
Why are we actually discussing this though? In case both Smiths somehow go with the Lions and both Ford/Furbank are injured? Parachuting Farrell back in just sounds like a bad idea in general.
I think it started from Danno’s eagerness to get Carbery qualified asap.
Why are we actually discussing this though? In case both Smiths somehow go with the Lions and both Ford/Furbank are injured? Parachuting Farrell back in just sounds like a bad idea in general.
I think it started from Danno’s eagerness to get Carbery qualified asap.
I heard Danno was so keen that they're talking about invoking the exceptional circumstances so we can pick Carbery without him leaving France.
Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2025 10:17 am
Guessing Pollock is match day reserve for the firsts and that Curry is facing a late fitness test
Though actually nobody has dropped down to the A squad.
Tom or Ben? Or is this a complete guess?
Feels odd having JVP in there with 16 senior caps already, but I guess some game time for him would be handy. I'd like to think he can push ahead of Randall again. Equally I'd like Porter instead as well.
Cramming Ojomoh in at 13 seems a bit pointless, but I guess that is the endless English struggle. Having more 12s than we know what to do with.
Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2025 10:17 am
Guessing Pollock is match day reserve for the firsts and that Curry is facing a late fitness test
Though actually nobody has dropped down to the A squad.
Tom or Ben? Or is this a complete guess?
Feels odd having JVP in there with 16 senior caps already, but I guess some game time for him would be handy. I'd like to think he can push ahead of Randall again. Equally I'd like Porter instead as well.
Cramming Ojomoh in at 13 seems a bit pointless, but I guess that is the endless English struggle. Having more 12s than we know what to do with.
Martin and Tom Curry were carrying knocks after France.
And I don't get the centre choices.
Really pleased Brantingham and Haffar will be getting run outs.