Gloucester vs Saints

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3436
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Gloucester vs Saints

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

Team News | Northampton Saints (H)

15 Santi Carreras

14 Christian Wade

13 Chris Harris

12 Seb Atkinson

11 Jack Cotgreave

10 Gareth Anscombe

9 Tomos Williams

1 Ciaran Knight

2 Jack Singleton

3 Afo Fasogbon

4 Freddie Clarke

5 Arthur Clark

6 Jack Clement

7 Lewis Ludlow (C)

8 Ruan Ackermann

16 Seb Blake

17 Jamal Ford-Robinson

18 Kirill Gotovtsev

19 Cam Jordan

20 Freddie Thomas

21 Caolan Englefield

22 Will Butler

23 George Barton

GLOUCESTER RUGBY vs NORTHAMPTON SAINTS
Gallagher Premiership, Round 18
Kingsholm Stadium
Saturday 31 May, 2025
Kick-off: 3.05pm

15 Jake Garside
14 Toby Cousins
13 Henry Lumley – Saint #2109
12 Tom Litchfield
11 Ollie Sleightholme
10 Rory Hutchinson
9 Jonny Weimann

1 Tarek Haffar
2 Henry Walker
3 Luke Green
4 Ed Prowse (c)
5 Chunya Munga
6 Archie Benson – First Premiership start
7 Tom Pearson
8 Fyn Brown

Replacements:
16 Nathan Langdon
17 Emmanuel Iyogun
18 Elliot Millar Mills
19 Callum Hunter-Hill
20 Tom Lockett
21 Iakopo Mapu
22 James Pater – Northampton Saints debut
23 Ewan Baker

Not available for selection:
Juarno Augustus, George Furbank, Sam Graham, George Hendy, George Makepeace-Cubitt, Temo Mayanavanua, Archie McParland, Burger Odendaal, James Ramm, Charlie Savala, Robbie Smith, Toby Thame, Tom West and Craig Wright.
Banquo
Posts: 19272
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Gloucester vs Saints

Post by Banquo »

giving nice goodbyes to a few academy lads and a debut to Pater. Baker off to cov I think, and Garside to wuss, Cousins to Ealing
fivepointer
Posts: 5923
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Gloucester vs Saints

Post by fivepointer »

Lumley played for England u18s this season. Quite a jump up.

Good to see Pearson back.
FKAS
Posts: 8521
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Gloucester vs Saints

Post by FKAS »

Saints effectively throwing in the towel for the final day of the season. With nothing to play for it makes sense but a bit of a shame to see nonetheless.
Banquo
Posts: 19272
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Gloucester vs Saints

Post by Banquo »

FKAS wrote: Fri May 30, 2025 2:08 pm Saints effectively throwing in the towel for the final day of the season. With nothing to play for it makes sense but a bit of a shame to see nonetheless.
its a valedictory and a blooding for young talent, but its a consequence of an overlong season- you saw how weak they were v UBB and then copped two more injuries; with their european run they are fckd, so player welfare tbh. Play-offs in June is well whacky.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Gloucester vs Saints

Post by Adam_P »

Interesting/surprising to see captaincy given to Prowse
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3436
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Gloucester vs Saints

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

fivepointer wrote: Fri May 30, 2025 1:57 pm Lumley played for England u18s this season. Quite a jump up.

Good to see Pearson back.
Pater and Lumley are both still school kids and both very highly thought of.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Gloucester vs Saints

Post by Adam_P »

I'd be quite annoyed with the TMO if I was a Glos fan. No way that foot hit the floor
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Gloucester vs Saints

Post by Adam_P »

Why we've decided Garside is surplus to requirements I'll never know
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3436
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Gloucester vs Saints

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

Adam_P wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 3:51 pm Why we've decided Garside is surplus to requirements I'll never know
Probably the switch from SH has come too late for him at Saints.
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3436
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Gloucester vs Saints

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

Thought Lunley did oretty well. Carried nicely. Tough day in defence alignment wise, but against that Glaws backline it’s always going to be a touch day. Threw an interception to Wade but frankly who hasn’t!

Nice to see Pater open his legs up. Atkinson did well to get a hand on him. He is rapid!
Danno
Posts: 2672
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Gloucester vs Saints

Post by Danno »

Epaminondas Pules wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 5:55 pm Threw an interception to Wade but frankly who hasn’t!
Ha! Quite.
Banquo
Posts: 19272
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Gloucester vs Saints

Post by Banquo »

Adam_P wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 3:51 pm Why we've decided Garside is surplus to requirements I'll never know
wuss may have made an offer he couldnt refuse?
Banquo
Posts: 19272
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Gloucester vs Saints

Post by Banquo »

Epaminondas Pules wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 5:53 pm
Adam_P wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 3:51 pm Why we've decided Garside is surplus to requirements I'll never know
Probably the switch from SH has come too late for him at Saints.
he's not been well served with dual reg moves. Played 9 one week for us, 14 against us the next
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14576
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Gloucester vs Saints

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 10:29 pm
Epaminondas Pules wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 5:53 pm
Adam_P wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 3:51 pm Why we've decided Garside is surplus to requirements I'll never know
Probably the switch from SH has come too late for him at Saints.
he's not been well served with dual reg moves. Played 9 one week for us, 14 against us the next
He almost certainly saw more ball the second week :shock: :lol:
Banquo
Posts: 19272
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Gloucester vs Saints

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote: Sun Jun 01, 2025 2:45 pm
Banquo wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 10:29 pm
Epaminondas Pules wrote: Sat May 31, 2025 5:53 pm

Probably the switch from SH has come too late for him at Saints.
he's not been well served with dual reg moves. Played 9 one week for us, 14 against us the next
He almost certainly saw more ball the second week :shock: :lol:
Harsh but both fair and incorrect at the same time.
Post Reply