WR's Player Welfare Initiative

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
Danno
Posts: 1437
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: WR's Player Welfare Initiative

Post by Danno »

Sweet zombie jesus, the opening few minutes are the agonising worst of squidge.

Skip to 3mins to get past the bulk of it.
User avatar
Puja
Site Admin
Posts: 5939
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: WR's Player Welfare Initiative

Post by Puja »

Have not watched the video yet, but the article giving the details sounds great:
The guidelines, developed by a panel of medical experts, coaches, unions, competitions and player representatives, are designed to better manage workload of players. The agreement also ensures a cap of 30 matches per season, alongside a limit of six consecutive weeks of action before rest is required.
{Googles "how long is the Rugby World Cup"} Apparently RWC 2027 is 43 days, or 6 weeks and a day. Can't imagine that's not where that limit has come from! I can only assume that they're confident of Australia not getting to the final, or they'll allow it to round down.
Players will also benefit from a mandatory five-week off-season break, at least one week’s rest following international duty, and a minimum of 12 weeks away from contact training across the year. Clearer communication between clubs and national teams is also encouraged to keep workloads consistent and carefully monitored.
That sounds terrific. If properly implemented and without "exceptions". Plus I'm waiting to see how the quart into a pint pot that is the French league and international sides works with giving players extra time off.
The recommendations have been supported by leading leagues, unions and the International Rugby Players Association, providing a united stance on one of the most important issues in the modern game. In areas where no domestic player load agreements are currently in place, the new framework will act as a safety net.

World Rugby have made these measures a condition of approval for the upcoming Nations Championship, which will begin in 2026 and reshape the international calendar.
Smart use of their leverage by the IRB there. Although I would like to know what the repercussions of not following the guidelines are and also what happens when there's arguments between two stakeholders. If a club plays a player for 6 consecutive weeks before the 6N, does the international side have to rest them for the first game? What happens if the country flogs a player and leaves the club with no space to fit 12 weeks away from contact training?

Seems like a great statement of intent. Let's see how they actually implement and enforce it.

Puja
Backist Monk
Post Reply