Ire v NZ - Dublin

User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2616
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

Lizard wrote:You will be pleased to learn that Alain Rolland has admitted that Peyper got something wrong: http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all- ... -was-wrong
Life's too short to read that extended whinge.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
User avatar
cashead
Posts: 3844
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:34 am

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by cashead »

So, you didn't read any post-match coverage out of Ireland either, then?
I'm a god
How can you kill a god?
Shame on you, sweet Nerevar
WaspInWales
Posts: 4503
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by WaspInWales »

The article makes a point about Ireland not being penalised.

How Peyper didn't penalise Trimble for a deliberate knock on before Barrett 'scored', I'll never know. It was cynical and stopped a near certain try being scored. Plus there were a number of rucks where bodies were flying in off their feet quite dangerously.
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 2183
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by Spiffy »

Lizard wrote:You will be pleased to learn that Alain Rolland has admitted that Peyper got something wrong: http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all- ... -was-wrong
You have to laugh at the irony of it - in his whistling days, Rolland himself was popularly known as the "cheating bent Mick" on the Welsh board here.
Digby
Posts: 15261
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by Digby »

http://www.skysports.com/rugby-union/ne ... eys-memory

Earls working hard to snatch the moral high ground from Ireland in their stance against NZ.

(worth keeping in mind in his hearing he offered the now standard apology and got his ban reduced in part for his remorse)
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 2183
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by Spiffy »

Digby wrote:http://www.skysports.com/rugby-union/ne ... eys-memory

Earls working hard to snatch the moral high ground from Ireland in their stance against NZ.

(worth keeping in mind in his hearing he offered the now standard apology and got his ban reduced in part for his remorse)
Earls is just a daft little bogger mouthing off and expressing his own thoughts. Nobody else in Ireland is moaning about his card. His silly utterances have absolutely nothing to do with last week's game against NZ, or with the IRFU, the team, the media, or the fans. He speaks (stupidly) for nobody but himself. His failure to engage his brain befoe opening his mouth is down to him alone. As I'm sure you can obviously see.
Your sad attempt to get some holier-than-thou mileage out of this falls lamentably flat.
User avatar
SerjeantWildgoose
Posts: 2171
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by SerjeantWildgoose »

Whereas your needless character assassination of Keith Earls hoists you to the summit of the moral high ground?

This thread has descended into the most serious heap of shyte posted on the IMB for some years. 'tis ashamed you should be.
Idle Feck
User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by BBD »

True, have we decided who is king of the hill yet?
User avatar
SerjeantWildgoose
Posts: 2171
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by SerjeantWildgoose »

Certainment! C'est moi, so it is.
Idle Feck
User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by BBD »

I'm Sparticus!
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2616
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

cashead wrote:So, you didn't read any post-match coverage out of Ireland either, then?
Nope.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
User avatar
hellovating
Posts: 266
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:59 am

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by hellovating »

Spiffy wrote:
Digby wrote:http://www.skysports.com/rugby-union/ne ... eys-memory

Earls working hard to snatch the moral high ground from Ireland in their stance against NZ.

(worth keeping in mind in his hearing he offered the now standard apology and got his ban reduced in part for his remorse)
Earls is just a daft little bogger mouthing off and expressing his own thoughts. Nobody else in Ireland is moaning about his card. His silly utterances have absolutely nothing to do with last week's game against NZ, or with the IRFU, the team, the media, or the fans. He speaks (stupidly) for nobody but himself. His failure to engage his brain befoe opening his mouth is down to him alone. As I'm sure you can obviously see.
Your sad attempt to get some holier-than-thou mileage out of this falls lamentably flat.
horrendous post.
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 2183
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by Spiffy »

User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by BBD »

Careful lads, let's not do anything hasty like linking to the Croydon gazette
paddy no 11
Posts: 1446
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by paddy no 11 »

don't think much of earls comments either
User avatar
SerjeantWildgoose
Posts: 2171
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm

Re: Ire v NZ - Dublin

Post by SerjeantWildgoose »

1. What Slattery writes bears no comparisson to the unwarranted slagging that you doled out; and

2. What the feck would Slattery know about anything? - https://www.linkedin.com/in/will-slattery-08a995105
Idle Feck
Post Reply