So 40 players, who's in?
Moderators: Puja, Misc Forum Mod
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
I'd have Mako coming off the bench and so start an all Irish front row. Not that I think Mako is necessarily worse or doesn't deserve to start over McGrath, just that I think he probably offers more from the bench.
Faletau or SOB should probably be on the bench given their flexibility, but if you're starting CJ then you don't really need cover at 8
Faletau or SOB should probably be on the bench given their flexibility, but if you're starting CJ then you don't really need cover at 8
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14579
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
All Irish front row starting followed by an all English front row (Sinckler not Cole) sounds good to me.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
Aye. If Sinckler's scrummaging can hold up to it, and I think it probably could given that the kiwis don't go in for power scrummaging much preferring to move the ball, then he's the better bench option.Mellsblue wrote:All Irish front row starting followed by an all English front row (Sinckler not Cole) sounds good to me.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Stom
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
Sigh.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I'd have Mako coming off the bench and so start an all Irish front row. Not that I think Mako is necessarily worse or doesn't deserve to start over McGrath, just that I think he probably offers more from the bench.
Faletau or SOB should probably be on the bench given their flexibility, but if you're starting CJ then you don't really need cover at 8
Do you think Gatland purposefully made a couple of contentious picks just to make it interesting? As this is all too civil. I can go along with that suggestion, plus the below one about Sinckler.
We need something to fight about!
-
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:54 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
OK.
"the kiwis don't go in for power scrummaging"
Bullocks.
"the kiwis don't go in for power scrummaging"
Bullocks.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14579
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
I know in NZ bullocks are treated as humans, both in human rights and marital law, but you can't play them at prop.J Dory wrote:OK.
"the kiwis don't go in for power scrummaging"
Bullocks.
-
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:54 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
Oops. Bollocks then. The NZ scrum has had at least parity with the home nations more often than not. The perception of weak All Blacks scrums goes back to Stephen Jones basket ball comments and the one 13 man scrum of England pre-2003 WC, it's bOllocks.Mellsblue wrote:I know in NZ bullocks are treated as humans, both in human rights and marital law, but you can't play them at prop.J Dory wrote:OK.
"the kiwis don't go in for power scrummaging"
Bullocks.
-
- Posts: 12212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
Robshaw.Stom wrote:Sigh.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I'd have Mako coming off the bench and so start an all Irish front row. Not that I think Mako is necessarily worse or doesn't deserve to start over McGrath, just that I think he probably offers more from the bench.
Faletau or SOB should probably be on the bench given their flexibility, but if you're starting CJ then you don't really need cover at 8
Do you think Gatland purposefully made a couple of contentious picks just to make it interesting? As this is all too civil. I can go along with that suggestion, plus the below one about Sinckler.
We need something to fight about!
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
Yeah. Injuries are inevitable before the first test. And they'll mostly be in the forwards.Stom wrote: Do you think Gatland purposefully made a couple of contentious picks just to make it interesting? As this is all too civil. I can go along with that suggestion, plus the below one about Sinckler.
We need something to fight about!
Anyone of the original picks that make it to the tests will deserve their spot. We hope.
I hope the guys who are feeling hard done by just keep it technical in their remaining games.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
The problem is that that isn't what I was saying. I wasn't suggesting that the NZ scrum was especially weak, rather that it isn't used to grind out penalties. NH scrummaging is different not because it's better but because it's seen as an end in and of itself.J Dory wrote:Oops. Bollocks then. The NZ scrum has had at least parity with the home nations more often than not. The perception of weak All Blacks scrums goes back to Stephen Jones basket ball comments and the one 13 man scrum of England pre-2003 WC, it's bOllocks.Mellsblue wrote:I know in NZ bullocks are treated as humans, both in human rights and marital law, but you can't play them at prop.J Dory wrote:OK.
"the kiwis don't go in for power scrummaging"
Bullocks.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:54 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
Dammit Euge Stom wants a scrap.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
Well he bloody well can't have one, right?J Dory wrote:Dammit Euge Stom wants a scrap.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Lizard
- Posts: 3812
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
Grinding out penalties from scrums won't beat the All Blacks (or the Souper teams, frankly). Modern tests average about 12 scrums a match. There's no way enough of those will be the Lions put in and in kickable position to overcome NZ's average 33 points per test (under Hansen v 3N/6N teams).Eugene Wrayburn wrote:The problem is that that isn't what I was saying. I wasn't suggesting that the NZ scrum was especially weak, rather that it isn't used to grind out penalties. NH scrummaging is different not because it's better but because it's seen as an end in and of itself.J Dory wrote:Oops. Bollocks then. The NZ scrum has had at least parity with the home nations more often than not. The perception of weak All Blacks scrums goes back to Stephen Jones basket ball comments and the one 13 man scrum of England pre-2003 WC, it's bOllocks.Mellsblue wrote: I know in NZ bullocks are treated as humans, both in human rights and marital law, but you can't play them at prop.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
I want suggesting that we try to find out penalties. I was suggesting that you wouldn't.Lizard wrote:Grinding out penalties from scrums won't beat the All Blacks (or the Souper teams, frankly). Modern tests average about 12 scrums a match. There's no way enough of those will be the Lions put in and in kickable position to overcome NZ's average 33 points per test (under Hansen v 3N/6N teams).Eugene Wrayburn wrote:The problem is that that isn't what I was saying. I wasn't suggesting that the NZ scrum was especially weak, rather that it isn't used to grind out penalties. NH scrummaging is different not because it's better but because it's seen as an end in and of itself.J Dory wrote:
Oops. Bollocks then. The NZ scrum has had at least parity with the home nations more often than not. The perception of weak All Blacks scrums goes back to Stephen Jones basket ball comments and the one 13 man scrum of England pre-2003 WC, it's bOllocks.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
Is it controversial to say that I think a Gatland team will lose every single match on tour?
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
Not for me, it isn'tEugene Wrayburn wrote:Is it controversial to say that I think a Gatland team will lose every single match on tour?
- Stom
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
I think even most of the Welsh posters have had enough of him and would agree :pEugene Wrayburn wrote:Is it controversial to say that I think a Gatland team will lose every single match on tour?
Schmidt would have been better...
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
I think Schmidt is a much better coach but he tends to take a while to get players into his system. I'd have liked Cotter or Galthie.Stom wrote:I think even most of the Welsh posters have had enough of him and would agree :pEugene Wrayburn wrote:Is it controversial to say that I think a Gatland team will lose every single match on tour?
Schmidt would have been better...
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Stom
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
Cotter took a long time with Scotland, too...Jones would have probably been the best coachEugene Wrayburn wrote:I think Schmidt is a much better coach but he tends to take a while to get players into his system. I'd have liked Cotter or Galthie.Stom wrote:I think even most of the Welsh posters have had enough of him and would agree :pEugene Wrayburn wrote:Is it controversial to say that I think a Gatland team will lose every single match on tour?
Schmidt would have been better...

- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
If Jones wasn't coaching England I would take him in aheartbeat over gatland. If he went whilst still England coach I could see him using it as an opportunity to fuck with the minds of the competition in the home nations.Stom wrote:Cotter took a long time with Scotland, too...Jones would have probably been the best coachEugene Wrayburn wrote:I think Schmidt is a much better coach but he tends to take a while to get players into his system. I'd have liked Cotter or Galthie.Stom wrote:
I think even most of the Welsh posters have had enough of him and would agree :p
Schmidt would have been better...
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14579
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
We won two Six Nations and equaled the world record for most consecutive tier one wins with a team including Dylan Hartley, James Haskell, Ben Youngs and Owen Farrell at IC. Consider your minds fucked already.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:If Jones wasn't coaching England I would take him in aheartbeat over gatland. If he went whilst still England coach I could see him using it as an opportunity to fuck with the minds of the competition in the home nations.Stom wrote:Cotter took a long time with Scotland, too...Jones would have probably been the best coachEugene Wrayburn wrote: I think Schmidt is a much better coach but he tends to take a while to get players into his system. I'd have liked Cotter or Galthie.
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
So totally, fucked. Totally.Mellsblue wrote:We won two Six Nations and equaled the world record for most consecutive tier one wins with a team including Dylan Hartley, James Haskell, Ben Youngs and Owen Farrell at IC. Consider your minds fucked already.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:If Jones wasn't coaching England I would take him in aheartbeat over gatland. If he went whilst still England coach I could see him using it as an opportunity to fuck with the minds of the competition in the home nations.Stom wrote:
Cotter took a long time with Scotland, too...Jones would have probably been the best coach
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
I'm pretty sure we won agrand slam with a team that occasionally featured Fergus McFadden. You ain't got nothing on us.Mellsblue wrote:We won two Six Nations and equaled the world record for most consecutive tier one wins with a team including Dylan Hartley, James Haskell, Ben Youngs and Owen Farrell at IC. Consider your minds fucked already.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:If Jones wasn't coaching England I would take him in aheartbeat over gatland. If he went whilst still England coach I could see him using it as an opportunity to fuck with the minds of the competition in the home nations.Stom wrote:
Cotter took a long time with Scotland, too...Jones would have probably been the best coach
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Stom
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
And Mr. Average himself, Dave Kearney. A player who looks like that bloke down the pub, and plays like him, too.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I'm pretty sure we won agrand slam with a team that occasionally featured Fergus McFadden. You ain't got nothing on us.Mellsblue wrote:We won two Six Nations and equaled the world record for most consecutive tier one wins with a team including Dylan Hartley, James Haskell, Ben Youngs and Owen Farrell at IC. Consider your minds fucked already.Eugene Wrayburn wrote: If Jones wasn't coaching England I would take him in aheartbeat over gatland. If he went whilst still England coach I could see him using it as an opportunity to fuck with the minds of the competition in the home nations.
-
- Posts: 12212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: So 40 players, who's in?
Kind of like Chris Robshaw, eh Euge?Stom wrote:And Mr. Average himself, Dave Kearney. A player who looks like that bloke down the pub, and plays like him, too.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I'm pretty sure we won agrand slam with a team that occasionally featured Fergus McFadden. You ain't got nothing on us.Mellsblue wrote: We won two Six Nations and equaled the world record for most consecutive tier one wins with a team including Dylan Hartley, James Haskell, Ben Youngs and Owen Farrell at IC. Consider your minds fucked already.