Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Moderator: OptimisticJock

Post Reply
hugh_woatmeigh
Posts: 4212
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by hugh_woatmeigh »

whatisthejava wrote:According to Sky sports and Twitter GB teams are under pressure to merge into a single team
from who?
ARM
Posts: 693
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:26 pm

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by ARM »

hp18 wrote:
ARM wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Would make a lot more sense if he was attack coach... It's a weird appointment.
Yeah. Defence is optional in 7s
Is it fuck
FFS.

You can have a whoosh too.
Big D
Posts: 5582
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by Big D »

hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
whatisthejava wrote:According to Sky sports and Twitter GB teams are under pressure to merge into a single team
from who?
Aw cunt else apparently. Other teams raging that there are effectively 3 sides from GB that can stop other teams gaining quali points etc.
User avatar
hp18
Posts: 639
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:34 pm

Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by hp18 »

Big D wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
whatisthejava wrote:According to Sky sports and Twitter GB teams are under pressure to merge into a single team
from who?
Aw cunt else apparently. Other teams raging that there are effectively 3 sides from GB that can stop other teams gaining quali points etc.
And they can all go fuck themselves.
The Coo is dead. Long live The Coo.
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 3810
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by Lizard »

Big D wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
whatisthejava wrote:According to Sky sports and Twitter GB teams are under pressure to merge into a single team
from who?
Aw cunt else apparently. Other teams raging that there are effectively 3 sides from GB that can stop other teams gaining quali points etc.
Sauce?
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Big D
Posts: 5582
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by Big D »

Lizard wrote:
Big D wrote:
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
from who?
Aw cunt else apparently. Other teams raging that there are effectively 3 sides from GB that can stop other teams gaining quali points etc.
Sauce?
To be fair i was being dramatic. It is only briefly mentioned here http://www.skysports.com/rugby-union/ne ... ky-sources
User avatar
Stones of granite
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by Stones of granite »

Big D wrote:
Lizard wrote:
Big D wrote: Aw cunt else apparently. Other teams raging that there are effectively 3 sides from GB that can stop other teams gaining quali points etc.
Sauce?
To be fair i was being dramatic. It is only briefly mentioned here http://www.skysports.com/rugby-union/ne ... ky-sources
Seems there might be more to it than that.
http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/153 ... ay_merger/
whatisthejava
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by whatisthejava »

I really dont think it will happen, it may suit World Rugby 7's but the SRU forced to by the public and their member clubs will just tell them to stick their olympics up their bum, cant see the RFU wanting to do this either

It also becomes clear that the SFA stance to not join a GB team has been right all along,
Cameo
Posts: 2968
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by Cameo »

whatisthejava wrote:I really dont think it will happen, it may suit World Rugby 7's but the SRU forced to by the public and their member clubs will just tell them to stick their olympics up their bum, cant see the RFU wanting to do this either

It also becomes clear that the SFA stance to not join a GB team has been right all along,
While being ridiculed for it too. Not worth it for the chance to have a couple involved in the Olympics every four years
User avatar
hp18
Posts: 639
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:34 pm

Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by hp18 »

Stones of granite wrote:
Big D wrote:
Seems there might be more to it than that.
http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/153 ... ay_merger/
That just says the exact same as the sky article, which is bollocks itself on the qualification front. Only one pre selected team can qualify, it's not who finishes higheat.
The Coo is dead. Long live The Coo.
User avatar
Stones of granite
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by Stones of granite »

hp18 wrote:
Stones of granite wrote:
Big D wrote:
Seems there might be more to it than that.
http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/153 ... ay_merger/
That just says the exact same as the sky article, which is bollocks itself on the qualification front. Only one pre selected team can qualify, it's not who finishes higheat.
I didn't read the Sky article. It must be coming from somewhere, unless the Herald just ripped off the Sky article (entirely possible).
Cameo
Posts: 2968
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm

Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by Cameo »

Stones of granite wrote:
hp18 wrote:
Stones of granite wrote:
That just says the exact same as the sky article, which is bollocks itself on the qualification front. Only one pre selected team can qualify, it's not who finishes higheat.
I didn't read the Sky article. It must be coming from somewhere, unless the Herald just ripped off the Sky article (entirely possible).
Yeah, the sky article seems pretty confident (and oblivious to the controversy it would cause) so it worries me. Hard to believe the SRU would agree to it. Personally, if it just became a GB team I wouldn't want us contributing any funding to it although they could take our fringe players if they pay them
User avatar
hp18
Posts: 639
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:34 pm

Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by hp18 »

Cameo wrote:
Stones of granite wrote:
hp18 wrote: That just says the exact same as the sky article, which is bollocks itself on the qualification front. Only one pre selected team can qualify, it's not who finishes higheat.
I didn't read the Sky article. It must be coming from somewhere, unless the Herald just ripped off the Sky article (entirely possible).
Yeah, the sky article seems pretty confident (and oblivious to the controversy it would cause) so it worries me. Hard to believe the SRU would agree to it. Personally, if it just became a GB team I wouldn't want us contributing any funding to it although they could take our fringe players if they pay them
It would be suicidal for the SRU.
The Coo is dead. Long live The Coo.
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2307
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

I think the story is nonsense. Amalgamation wouldn't be in the interests of world rugby or anyone other than teams just outside the 7 series core participants. The supposed justification for the move shows a failure to understand the qualification procedure.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
User avatar
Stones of granite
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by Stones of granite »

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I think the story is nonsense. Amalgamation wouldn't be in the interests of world rugby or anyone other than teams just outside the 7 series core participants. The supposed justification for the move shows a failure to understand the qualification procedure.
Without wishing to appear to be disagreeing, I'm curious as to why you think it wouldn't be in the interests of World Rugby.
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2307
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

Stones of granite wrote:
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I think the story is nonsense. Amalgamation wouldn't be in the interests of world rugby or anyone other than teams just outside the 7 series core participants. The supposed justification for the move shows a failure to understand the qualification procedure.
Without wishing to appear to be disagreeing, I'm curious as to why you think it wouldn't be in the interests of World Rugby.
Because they have a product to sell that requires as many strong teams as possible. They have a rugby public that won't identify particularly strongly with Team GB outside Olympics as well.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
User avatar
Stones of granite
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by Stones of granite »

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:
Stones of granite wrote:
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I think the story is nonsense. Amalgamation wouldn't be in the interests of world rugby or anyone other than teams just outside the 7 series core participants. The supposed justification for the move shows a failure to understand the qualification procedure.
Without wishing to appear to be disagreeing, I'm curious as to why you think it wouldn't be in the interests of World Rugby.
Because they have a product to sell that requires as many strong teams as possible. They have a rugby public that won't identify particularly strongly with Team GB outside Olympics as well.
I'm afraid that I don't find that very convincing. The English Rugby Public dwarf Scotland and Wales' many times over, and most English people use England and GB as interchangeable terms anyway. I simply don't believe there would be a measurable effect on attendance at the London round even if every Scot and Welshman stayed away.

World Rugby ave already made it clear that they are happy to disrupt the home nations to favour emerging nations, and it would be no ssurprise to me if they were tp very marginally reduce the overall quality of the competition in order to be seen to be "spreading things out a bit".
Big D
Posts: 5582
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by Big D »

Allegedly they want to reduce the comp to 12 teams so they won't be spreading it out.
User avatar
hp18
Posts: 639
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:34 pm

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by hp18 »

Big D wrote:Allegedly they want to reduce the comp to 12 teams so they won't be spreading it out.
That would likely kill the series and growth of the game.
The Coo is dead. Long live The Coo.
Cameo
Posts: 2968
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by Cameo »

hp18 wrote:
Big D wrote:Allegedly they want to reduce the comp to 12 teams so they won't be spreading it out.
That would likely kill the series and growth of the game.
Wouldn't go that far but would leave you with an annoying format and less scope for the developing countries. So, on second thoughts maybe I would go that far
Big D
Posts: 5582
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by Big D »

hp18 wrote:
Big D wrote:Allegedly they want to reduce the comp to 12 teams so they won't be spreading it out.
That would likely kill the series and growth of the game.
Oh I agree totally.
User avatar
General Zod
Posts: 1817
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:32 pm

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by General Zod »

There's plenty room for expansion. It's a cracking tournament/ spectacle which could go to more venues around the world, as well as gradually add more teams.

No team GB.
Cameo
Posts: 2968
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by Cameo »

Seems to be getting a wee bit of attention now http://www.scotsman.com/sport/rugby-uni ... -1-4456225
laribold
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by laribold »

Love this caption to a picture at the end of that article about the u20s!

"After a mere 112 years, Scotland are finally on a roll against New Zealand"
:D
User avatar
General Zod
Posts: 1817
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:32 pm

Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency

Post by General Zod »

Scott Hastings getting in on it now.

http://www.scotsman.com/sport/rugby-uni ... -1-4458579

If this went through it would be so much of a significant and material change that we would need a new referendum... :?
Post Reply