Ioane? is he the Bus? Daly is a quick lad.zer0 wrote:The Bus has been upgraded to a Ferrari.Banquo wrote:he gassed Daly, so is uber quick
v AB'S - First Test
Moderators: Puja, Misc Forum Mod
-
- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
- Mr Mwenda
- Posts: 2461
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Sexton's loop arounds are rather hand in mouth today...
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Take the points!
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 2:28 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
What game is Stuart Barnes watching?
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Deserved the second try.
-
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Nah. J.Savea is nicknamed the Bus. He's been dropped for just about the only guy in NZ rugby who is faster than B.Barrett.Banquo wrote:Ioane? is he the Bus? Daly is a quick lad.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
consolation Webb..
30-15.
outplayed mostly.
30-15.
outplayed mostly.
-
- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
ah I see, was being dim!zer0 wrote:Nah. J.Savea is nicknamed the Bus. He's been dropped for just about the only guy in NZ rugby who is faster than B.Barrett.Banquo wrote:Ioane? is he the Bus? Daly is a quick lad.
-
- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
well played AB's, overcame lineout issues, and drubbed us.
- Donny osmond
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Need to sort out the forwards as a unit for next week. I wasnt too impressed with Teo, good player but didnt really add anything particularly to the lions attack, need more creativity. Back 3 showed they can exploit space... if we dont use it due to overly conservative selection/game plan (too many kicks from Murray eg) then we arent giving ourselves a chance.
Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
-
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
TBF "traded in for a Ferrari" would've been clearer, I think.Banquo wrote:ah I see, was being dim!
-
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:38 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
NZ far more organised and with better skills. However, it's still doable;
We stood off to much in defence rather than pressuring in the way that has been successful and let them play too much.
The lack of attacking threat at 10, 12, 13 meant we were always going to struggle and rely on penalties which we didn't get.
Peyper gave us very little - didn't change the outcome but a different ref would help.
We need more pace, it's in the squad but wasn't picked.
Just lost shape, need to steady the heads.
Forwards not nasty or streetsmart enough.
We won't beat NZ by being conventional as we won't be organised and fluid enough, so just need to pressure them and not let them play. Pace and chaos is what's needed, and a more solid scrum.
We stood off to much in defence rather than pressuring in the way that has been successful and let them play too much.
The lack of attacking threat at 10, 12, 13 meant we were always going to struggle and rely on penalties which we didn't get.
Peyper gave us very little - didn't change the outcome but a different ref would help.
We need more pace, it's in the squad but wasn't picked.
Just lost shape, need to steady the heads.
Forwards not nasty or streetsmart enough.
We won't beat NZ by being conventional as we won't be organised and fluid enough, so just need to pressure them and not let them play. Pace and chaos is what's needed, and a more solid scrum.
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Not a dreadful performance by the Lions, ABs were just much better.
Thought Foxy had a good game. Daly, Sanjay and Watson all good in the backs. Farrell was a mixed bag as always. Seemed to start off well enough but a few missed tackles and that l-r pass was a shocker. Murray was mostly good.
Thought Foxy had a good game. Daly, Sanjay and Watson all good in the backs. Farrell was a mixed bag as always. Seemed to start off well enough but a few missed tackles and that l-r pass was a shocker. Murray was mostly good.
- Mr Mwenda
- Posts: 2461
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Thought all the starters had decent enough games - although a few key errors as noted from a couple. The collapse seemed to come when the subs arrived. Not sure if this was them failing to shore up an increasingly creaking side or whether some weren't ready for the pace/intensity.
I think I''d give Sexton a start next week. He might have a better chance of unleashing the back three. I think I'd tinker with the bench a bit.
Was Jones worth his start at lock? I didn't notice him much and Itoje seemed to do well but the Lions had somewhat disintegrated by that stage and I don't doubt Jones may have been one reason it was holding together earlier. Kruis also seemed to have a mixed day, mind.
I think I''d give Sexton a start next week. He might have a better chance of unleashing the back three. I think I'd tinker with the bench a bit.
Was Jones worth his start at lock? I didn't notice him much and Itoje seemed to do well but the Lions had somewhat disintegrated by that stage and I don't doubt Jones may have been one reason it was holding together earlier. Kruis also seemed to have a mixed day, mind.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10534
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
All blacks far more clinical. They controlled the game for key stretches and took away areas of Lions perceived strength, i.e. the scrum and driving line out.
That said, we conjured up some good attacking opportunities, but only turned one in to a try. We butchered another 3 or so decent opportunities which if the tables had been turned probably would have been scored.
Too many errors, too many penalties and some great individual skills by key AB players at key times.
Sky commentators want more dynamism from the Lions pack, which probably is a dig at starting Itoje. Im not convinced that would have made any difference. I would look at the back row, we need to be more effective at slowing down AB ball and if we can't get the platform to launch SOB at their defence then perhaps start with Warburton and have SOB in reserve, or even Tipuric (depending on POM's injury)
That said, we conjured up some good attacking opportunities, but only turned one in to a try. We butchered another 3 or so decent opportunities which if the tables had been turned probably would have been scored.
Too many errors, too many penalties and some great individual skills by key AB players at key times.
Sky commentators want more dynamism from the Lions pack, which probably is a dig at starting Itoje. Im not convinced that would have made any difference. I would look at the back row, we need to be more effective at slowing down AB ball and if we can't get the platform to launch SOB at their defence then perhaps start with Warburton and have SOB in reserve, or even Tipuric (depending on POM's injury)
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:23 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Lions ball retention let them down. The first 10 minutes they run through good phases and mixed up the distribution. After that they looked panicky with the little amount of ball they had. A bit of composure would have made s ignificant difference, i feel.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: v AB'S - First Test
or notDigby wrote:Time to pop to the shops, something interesting seems likely to happen as a consequence
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 12:40 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Sexton to start with Faz and Foxy outside. Back 3 to remain. I'm not sure what benefit Halfpenny brings to the bench, given that Daly and Watson can both play FB if required.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10534
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Composure let us down. Watson's near miss for example (and he was nt the only one to get carried away) but he tried to throw the miracle pass when he would have been better hanging onto it post tack and taking the ruck.Mush wrote:Lions ball retention let them down. The first 10 minutes they run through good phases and mixed up the distribution. After that they looked panicky with the little amount of ball they had. A bit of composure would have made s ignificant difference, i feel.
Back to the drawing board, but I don't think there are too many changes that are viable, just cutting out the error rate would be a start.
- Lizard
- Posts: 3812
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: v AB'S - First Test
That was a great performance from the Lions. The first try (ruined for me by Sky Pacific playing the halftime ad break 2 minutes early - I shit you not) was brilliant and garnered a round of applause (on replay) from the room of about 2 dozen kiwis I was watching with.
We were genuinely nearly just a bit worried at half time.
We were genuinely nearly just a bit worried at half time.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
- skidger
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Lizard wrote:That was a great performance from the Lions. The first try (ruined for me by Sky Pacific playing the halftime ad break 2 minutes early - I shit you not) was brilliant and garnered a round of applause (on replay) from the room of about 2 dozen kiwis I was watching with.
We were genuinely nearly just a bit worried at half time.
Ha! Are there is the difference between New Zealand rugby and the rest of us. Easily a tier above and apart from starting Itoje i am not sure what the Lions can do. Well maybe finish off some nearly moments.
- jngf
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Farrell is not an instinctive 10 - unless that instinct is to kick it in the air rather than release backs.
Faletau had a very quiet game in contrast to the high standards he set earlier (though I'm hoping he has a bigger impact in the second test as he's our best 8). Watson looked lost in second half and I question if he and Daly are sufficiently quick or powerful as out and out finishers. Kruis grafts hard but isn't that powerful in the loose. AWJ is simply on one Lions tour too many at this stage in his career. I do worry tough about Itoje believing his own hype - he didn't seem to have that much impact to me when he came on and looks a bit immobile/too heavy?
Faletau had a very quiet game in contrast to the high standards he set earlier (though I'm hoping he has a bigger impact in the second test as he's our best 8). Watson looked lost in second half and I question if he and Daly are sufficiently quick or powerful as out and out finishers. Kruis grafts hard but isn't that powerful in the loose. AWJ is simply on one Lions tour too many at this stage in his career. I do worry tough about Itoje believing his own hype - he didn't seem to have that much impact to me when he came on and looks a bit immobile/too heavy?
Last edited by jngf on Sat Jun 24, 2017 11:32 am, edited 4 times in total.
- Lizard
- Posts: 3812
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: v AB'S - First Test
The Lions just need a Barrett or two, and a winger who can chase down R. Ioane.skidger wrote:Lizard wrote:That was a great performance from the Lions. The first try (ruined for me by Sky Pacific playing the halftime ad break 2 minutes early - I shit you not) was brilliant and garnered a round of applause (on replay) from the room of about 2 dozen kiwis I was watching with.
We were genuinely nearly just a bit worried at half time.
Ha! Are there is the difference between New Zealand rugby and the rest of us. Easily a tier above and apart from starting Itoje i am not sure what the Lions can do. Well maybe finish off some nearly moments.
Did you see that bit where he outpaced both your wings at once? Did you? I did.
(sorry, I've been drinking fruit cocktails involving creme de menthe)
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
-
- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
fair playzer0 wrote:TBF "traded in for a Ferrari" would've been clearer, I think.Banquo wrote:ah I see, was being dim!

-
- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Faz is no 12 at this level imo.Lord Llandaff wrote:Sexton to start with Faz and Foxy outside. Back 3 to remain. I'm not sure what benefit Halfpenny brings to the bench, given that Daly and Watson can both play FB if required.