Tell us something we don't know; barely championship quality.Timbo wrote:Allinson is truly crap.
How he's 3rd choice ahead of HomerJr I'll never know
Moderator: Puja
Tell us something we don't know; barely championship quality.Timbo wrote:Allinson is truly crap.
They can't declare it as an HIA. Underhill was verified unconscious, so no HIA is performed as that's an automatic removal from the game.16th man wrote:Got a hip / knee to the head making yet another tackle.
Bath seem to have cocked up with not stating it's a HIA, so not being able to switch another guy on. That or they've been told they can't. This really, really needs sorting out. Of course teams are going to mess about with the HIA rules, if there is a risk of having to play a man down becuase it might be deemed an injury sub instead.
I actually thought he was dire! Kicked away good ball regularly with very poor execution. Plus he had his usual allergy to contact, with the nadir being backing out of tackling the behemoth that is Tapuai in the first half.16th man wrote:I know we need to be careful saying this sort of thing on here, but Mallinder has been pretty good tonight, following up a good game last week.
About my only aspect of pride from that game, at last a DOR who actually respects the HIA rules, and will apply them for the sake of his players.Puja wrote: They can't declare it as an HIA. Underhill was verified unconscious, so no HIA is performed as that's an automatic removal from the game.
odd to have those bits in bold next to each other, don't you think? Not sure what Joseph was meant to do, but predicted someone would say this.....when you have such a poor pack effort, and Priestland standing still and shovelling ball out whats he supposed to do. Joseph was shoring up defence in the main.TheNomad wrote:Awful performance by Bath
Allinson and their front five were terrible. Made it impossible for anyone else.
Joseph looked poor as well. They just never got going.
Ribbans looks like a really good player.
fivepointer wrote:Saints look like a different team. 2nd week in a row they have played with real aggression and intensity. Keep it up and top 4 is on the cards. Ribbans and Collins excellent, with yet another unsung and unselfish effort from Gibson. Mallinder a mixed bag, kicking far too much for my liking.
Bath were never really in it. The last 2 weeks will have taken something out of them but it was a disappointingly flat performance. Underhill did enough to warrant some of the hype. He does look the part. Interested to see how he goes with Bath on the front foot.
Agreed - looked very much like a 6 to me from last night. Very destructive, but never looked any kind of threat to Northampton getting the ball back. Not sure how much of that was the dominance of the Saints pack, how much of it was the new ruck laws throwing off his timing, how much of it was the ref allowing everyone to throw themselves off their feet at the breakdown, and how much was just him and his own skills.Oakboy wrote:I agree about Underhill but, to me, he looks like a blindside playing with 7 on his back. He may turn out to be better at that than Robshaw and Haskell, mind.
Not to worry. Robshaw has the most turnovers so far this season. Two 6.5's, what could go wrong?Puja wrote:Agreed - looked very much like a 6 to me from last night. Very destructive, but never looked any kind of threat to Northampton getting the ball back. Not sure how much of that was the dominance of the Saints pack, how much of it was the new ruck laws throwing off his timing, how much of it was the ref allowing everyone to throw themselves off their feet at the breakdown, and how much was just him and his own skills.Oakboy wrote:I agree about Underhill but, to me, he looks like a blindside playing with 7 on his back. He may turn out to be better at that than Robshaw and Haskell, mind.
Puja
The main thing that could go wrong is people's expectation. I've got no problem with any of the three playing at 7. But, then, I see no problem with any of those three, Lawes, Billy V or Itoje playing at 6 if circumstances require it.Mellsblue wrote:Not to worry. Robshaw has the most turnovers so far this season. Two 6.5's, what could go wrong?Puja wrote:Agreed - looked very much like a 6 to me from last night. Very destructive, but never looked any kind of threat to Northampton getting the ball back. Not sure how much of that was the dominance of the Saints pack, how much of it was the new ruck laws throwing off his timing, how much of it was the ref allowing everyone to throw themselves off their feet at the breakdown, and how much was just him and his own skills.Oakboy wrote:I agree about Underhill but, to me, he looks like a blindside playing with 7 on his back. He may turn out to be better at that than Robshaw and Haskell, mind.
Puja
Prickly much; he was good last week, but I thought he was crap last night. Wasted so much possession with bad kicks.16th man wrote:I know we need to be careful saying this sort of thing on here, but Mallinder has been pretty good tonight, following up a good game last week.
Totally agree; he had a slightly better second half, but options first half were dire; the crowd were giving him a real hard time. It was clearly the plan for territory, but high risk v Bath's back three- mind Watson was on one leg most of the match.Puja wrote:I actually thought he was dire! Kicked away good ball regularly with very poor execution. Plus he had his usual allergy to contact, with the nadir being backing out of tackling the behemoth that is Tapuai in the first half.16th man wrote:I know we need to be careful saying this sort of thing on here, but Mallinder has been pretty good tonight, following up a good game last week.
Puja
maybe so, but what IS being observed....I'm interested in why its being said. Its not an arguing point, but an enquiry.twitchy wrote:I don't think it's meant as a criticism just an observation.
It would be for my mind. Northampton got continuous quick, clean ball and I would've liked to have seen their 7 dropping out of the defensive line and looking to float around and poach or slow down the ball, rather than stepping up to always be first man to make the tackle. Don't get me wrong, he did a great job of stopping them from going forwards, but they did recycle the ball every time, so it just went to another phase.Banquo wrote:So be great to understand what is meant- in multi-phase rugby, players increasingly do similar jobs. I 'm guessing its evidence of stealing/slowing the ball on the floor that is being sought?
quite. But what you said is what I assumed was meant by he 'played like a 6'. A tad narrow tbh.Puja wrote:. Hard to tell just from one game where the rest of his pack were getting hosed.Banquo wrote:So be great to understand what is meant- in multi-phase rugby, players increasingly do similar jobs. I 'm guessing its evidence of stealing/slowing the ball on the floor that is being sought?
Puja