from who?whatisthejava wrote:According to Sky sports and Twitter GB teams are under pressure to merge into a single team
Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
Moderator: OptimisticJock
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:26 pm
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
FFS.hp18 wrote:Is it fuckARM wrote:Yeah. Defence is optional in 7shugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Would make a lot more sense if he was attack coach... It's a weird appointment.
You can have a whoosh too.
-
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
Aw cunt else apparently. Other teams raging that there are effectively 3 sides from GB that can stop other teams gaining quali points etc.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:from who?whatisthejava wrote:According to Sky sports and Twitter GB teams are under pressure to merge into a single team
- hp18
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:34 pm
Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
And they can all go fuck themselves.Big D wrote:Aw cunt else apparently. Other teams raging that there are effectively 3 sides from GB that can stop other teams gaining quali points etc.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:from who?whatisthejava wrote:According to Sky sports and Twitter GB teams are under pressure to merge into a single team
The Coo is dead. Long live The Coo.
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
Sauce?Big D wrote:Aw cunt else apparently. Other teams raging that there are effectively 3 sides from GB that can stop other teams gaining quali points etc.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:from who?whatisthejava wrote:According to Sky sports and Twitter GB teams are under pressure to merge into a single team
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
-
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
To be fair i was being dramatic. It is only briefly mentioned here http://www.skysports.com/rugby-union/ne ... ky-sourcesLizard wrote:Sauce?Big D wrote:Aw cunt else apparently. Other teams raging that there are effectively 3 sides from GB that can stop other teams gaining quali points etc.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
from who?
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
Seems there might be more to it than that.Big D wrote:To be fair i was being dramatic. It is only briefly mentioned here http://www.skysports.com/rugby-union/ne ... ky-sourcesLizard wrote:Sauce?Big D wrote: Aw cunt else apparently. Other teams raging that there are effectively 3 sides from GB that can stop other teams gaining quali points etc.
http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/153 ... ay_merger/
-
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
I really dont think it will happen, it may suit World Rugby 7's but the SRU forced to by the public and their member clubs will just tell them to stick their olympics up their bum, cant see the RFU wanting to do this either
It also becomes clear that the SFA stance to not join a GB team has been right all along,
It also becomes clear that the SFA stance to not join a GB team has been right all along,
-
- Posts: 2968
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
While being ridiculed for it too. Not worth it for the chance to have a couple involved in the Olympics every four yearswhatisthejava wrote:I really dont think it will happen, it may suit World Rugby 7's but the SRU forced to by the public and their member clubs will just tell them to stick their olympics up their bum, cant see the RFU wanting to do this either
It also becomes clear that the SFA stance to not join a GB team has been right all along,
- hp18
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:34 pm
Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
That just says the exact same as the sky article, which is bollocks itself on the qualification front. Only one pre selected team can qualify, it's not who finishes higheat.Stones of granite wrote:Big D wrote:
Seems there might be more to it than that.
http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/153 ... ay_merger/
The Coo is dead. Long live The Coo.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
I didn't read the Sky article. It must be coming from somewhere, unless the Herald just ripped off the Sky article (entirely possible).hp18 wrote:That just says the exact same as the sky article, which is bollocks itself on the qualification front. Only one pre selected team can qualify, it's not who finishes higheat.Stones of granite wrote:Big D wrote:
Seems there might be more to it than that.
http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/153 ... ay_merger/
-
- Posts: 2968
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm
Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
Yeah, the sky article seems pretty confident (and oblivious to the controversy it would cause) so it worries me. Hard to believe the SRU would agree to it. Personally, if it just became a GB team I wouldn't want us contributing any funding to it although they could take our fringe players if they pay themStones of granite wrote:I didn't read the Sky article. It must be coming from somewhere, unless the Herald just ripped off the Sky article (entirely possible).hp18 wrote:That just says the exact same as the sky article, which is bollocks itself on the qualification front. Only one pre selected team can qualify, it's not who finishes higheat.Stones of granite wrote:
- hp18
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:34 pm
Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
It would be suicidal for the SRU.Cameo wrote:Yeah, the sky article seems pretty confident (and oblivious to the controversy it would cause) so it worries me. Hard to believe the SRU would agree to it. Personally, if it just became a GB team I wouldn't want us contributing any funding to it although they could take our fringe players if they pay themStones of granite wrote:I didn't read the Sky article. It must be coming from somewhere, unless the Herald just ripped off the Sky article (entirely possible).hp18 wrote: That just says the exact same as the sky article, which is bollocks itself on the qualification front. Only one pre selected team can qualify, it's not who finishes higheat.
The Coo is dead. Long live The Coo.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
I think the story is nonsense. Amalgamation wouldn't be in the interests of world rugby or anyone other than teams just outside the 7 series core participants. The supposed justification for the move shows a failure to understand the qualification procedure.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
Without wishing to appear to be disagreeing, I'm curious as to why you think it wouldn't be in the interests of World Rugby.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I think the story is nonsense. Amalgamation wouldn't be in the interests of world rugby or anyone other than teams just outside the 7 series core participants. The supposed justification for the move shows a failure to understand the qualification procedure.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
Because they have a product to sell that requires as many strong teams as possible. They have a rugby public that won't identify particularly strongly with Team GB outside Olympics as well.Stones of granite wrote:Without wishing to appear to be disagreeing, I'm curious as to why you think it wouldn't be in the interests of World Rugby.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I think the story is nonsense. Amalgamation wouldn't be in the interests of world rugby or anyone other than teams just outside the 7 series core participants. The supposed justification for the move shows a failure to understand the qualification procedure.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
I'm afraid that I don't find that very convincing. The English Rugby Public dwarf Scotland and Wales' many times over, and most English people use England and GB as interchangeable terms anyway. I simply don't believe there would be a measurable effect on attendance at the London round even if every Scot and Welshman stayed away.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Because they have a product to sell that requires as many strong teams as possible. They have a rugby public that won't identify particularly strongly with Team GB outside Olympics as well.Stones of granite wrote:Without wishing to appear to be disagreeing, I'm curious as to why you think it wouldn't be in the interests of World Rugby.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I think the story is nonsense. Amalgamation wouldn't be in the interests of world rugby or anyone other than teams just outside the 7 series core participants. The supposed justification for the move shows a failure to understand the qualification procedure.
World Rugby ave already made it clear that they are happy to disrupt the home nations to favour emerging nations, and it would be no ssurprise to me if they were tp very marginally reduce the overall quality of the competition in order to be seen to be "spreading things out a bit".
-
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
Allegedly they want to reduce the comp to 12 teams so they won't be spreading it out.
- hp18
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:34 pm
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
That would likely kill the series and growth of the game.Big D wrote:Allegedly they want to reduce the comp to 12 teams so they won't be spreading it out.
The Coo is dead. Long live The Coo.
-
- Posts: 2968
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
Wouldn't go that far but would leave you with an annoying format and less scope for the developing countries. So, on second thoughts maybe I would go that farhp18 wrote:That would likely kill the series and growth of the game.Big D wrote:Allegedly they want to reduce the comp to 12 teams so they won't be spreading it out.
-
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
Oh I agree totally.hp18 wrote:That would likely kill the series and growth of the game.Big D wrote:Allegedly they want to reduce the comp to 12 teams so they won't be spreading it out.
- General Zod
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:32 pm
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
There's plenty room for expansion. It's a cracking tournament/ spectacle which could go to more venues around the world, as well as gradually add more teams.
No team GB.
No team GB.
-
- Posts: 2968
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
Seems to be getting a wee bit of attention now http://www.scotsman.com/sport/rugby-uni ... -1-4456225
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
Love this caption to a picture at the end of that article about the u20s!
"After a mere 112 years, Scotland are finally on a roll against New Zealand"

"After a mere 112 years, Scotland are finally on a roll against New Zealand"

- General Zod
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:32 pm
Re: Sevens 2016-17 march to glory and general re-start efficiency
Scott Hastings getting in on it now.
http://www.scotsman.com/sport/rugby-uni ... -1-4458579
If this went through it would be so much of a significant and material change that we would need a new referendum...
http://www.scotsman.com/sport/rugby-uni ... -1-4458579
If this went through it would be so much of a significant and material change that we would need a new referendum...
