Congratulations
Moderator: Sandydragon
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9067
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Congratulations
Well played Wales, through the the tournie. A very well deserved Grand Slam.
It'll be good to goninto the RWC with 2 genuine contenders from the NH, pity Ireland don't look like making it 3 (watch out for incoming "sandbagging" claims)
It'll be good to goninto the RWC with 2 genuine contenders from the NH, pity Ireland don't look like making it 3 (watch out for incoming "sandbagging" claims)
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Congratulations
you spelled 'teabagging' wrong
- UKHamlet
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:07 pm
- Location: Swansea
- Contact:
Re: RE: Re: Congratulations
[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]Buggaluggs wrote:you spelled 'teabagging' wrong
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9067
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
- Puja
- Posts: 17529
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Congratulations
Seconded. A very well deserved GS and well on reaching 2nd in the rankings. Interestingly, if NZ lose their first two RC games against SA and Aus (or lose the first by >16 points) you'll reach the top of the rankings. Unlikely, but I would cheer if that did happen.
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 5939
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Congratulations
Thirded. Well done Wales.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: Congratulations
Thanks... though who knows where we'll all be after the RWC warm-up matches: Wales/Englandx2, Wales/Irelandx2, England/Ireland??Puja wrote:Seconded. A very well deserved GS and well on reaching 2nd in the rankings. Interestingly, if NZ lose their first two RC games against SA and Aus (or lose the first by >16 points) you'll reach the top of the rankings. Unlikely, but I would cheer if that did happen.
Puja
- Sourdust
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Congratulations
We could leapfrog NZ without playing them?Puja wrote:Seconded. A very well deserved GS and well on reaching 2nd in the rankings. Interestingly, if NZ lose their first two RC games against SA and Aus (or lose the first by >16 points) you'll reach the top of the rankings. Unlikely, but I would cheer if that did happen.
Puja
Says it all about the rankings, doesn't it?
- Puja
- Posts: 17529
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Congratulations
...not really. You could leapfrog New Zealand if they lose twice in a row to teams you've recently beaten; that's hardly unreasonable.Sourdust wrote:We could leapfrog NZ without playing them?Puja wrote:Seconded. A very well deserved GS and well on reaching 2nd in the rankings. Interestingly, if NZ lose their first two RC games against SA and Aus (or lose the first by >16 points) you'll reach the top of the rankings. Unlikely, but I would cheer if that did happen.
Puja
Says it all about the rankings, doesn't it?
Puja
Backist Monk
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10480
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Congratulations
We will definitely lose a couple of those games; are they going to be four full fat internationals or are a couple going to be trial type games? If all four are full on then that’s one hell of a warm up!Son of Mathonwy wrote:Thanks... though who knows where we'll all be after the RWC warm-up matches: Wales/Englandx2, Wales/Irelandx2, England/Ireland??Puja wrote:Seconded. A very well deserved GS and well on reaching 2nd in the rankings. Interestingly, if NZ lose their first two RC games against SA and Aus (or lose the first by >16 points) you'll reach the top of the rankings. Unlikely, but I would cheer if that did happen.
Puja
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: Congratulations
I bet Gatland wishes he could cancel some of those matches. Wales are in a very good place whereas England and Ireland are both in disarray. They need those practice games much more than we do.Sandydragon wrote:We will definitely lose a couple of those games; are they going to be four full fat internationals or are a couple going to be trial type games? If all four are full on then that’s one hell of a warm up!Son of Mathonwy wrote:Thanks... though who knows where we'll all be after the RWC warm-up matches: Wales/Englandx2, Wales/Irelandx2, England/Ireland??Puja wrote:Seconded. A very well deserved GS and well on reaching 2nd in the rankings. Interestingly, if NZ lose their first two RC games against SA and Aus (or lose the first by >16 points) you'll reach the top of the rankings. Unlikely, but I would cheer if that did happen.
Puja
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: Congratulations
Agreed. The whole point of a ranking system is that it allows comparison without needing teams (or players) to be in one league (or to systematically play everyone else in some way).Puja wrote:...not really. You could leapfrog New Zealand if they lose twice in a row to teams you've recently beaten; that's hardly unreasonable.Sourdust wrote:We could leapfrog NZ without playing them?Puja wrote:Seconded. A very well deserved GS and well on reaching 2nd in the rankings. Interestingly, if NZ lose their first two RC games against SA and Aus (or lose the first by >16 points) you'll reach the top of the rankings. Unlikely, but I would cheer if that did happen.
Puja
Says it all about the rankings, doesn't it?
Puja
-
- Posts: 5582
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Congratulations
Congrats lads and lassies.
- Sourdust
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Congratulations
Put like that, it does indeed sound logical.Puja wrote:...not really. You could leapfrog New Zealand if they lose twice in a row to teams you've recently beaten; that's hardly unreasonable.Sourdust wrote:
We could leapfrog NZ without playing them?
Says it all about the rankings, doesn't it?
Puja
I'd still feel pretty hollow about being ahead of a team we haven't beaten in my lifetime, though.

- Puja
- Posts: 17529
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Congratulations
South Africa are still ahead of Japan.Sourdust wrote:Put like that, it does indeed sound logical.Puja wrote:...not really. You could leapfrog New Zealand if they lose twice in a row to teams you've recently beaten; that's hardly unreasonable.Sourdust wrote:
We could leapfrog NZ without playing them?
Says it all about the rankings, doesn't it?
Puja
I'd still feel pretty hollow about being ahead of a team we haven't beaten in my lifetime, though.
Anyway, it's a moot point, as I don't see it happening, but I'll still be cheering for it.
Puja
Backist Monk