All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Moderator: morepork

Post Reply
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 4048
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Lizard »

So Shag and Co. have gone from three Barretts and two 1st 5/8s to just the one - picking Jordie at 10 with absolutely no specialist cover whatsoever. The official line is that TJ Perenara is covering 10, being named alongside Brad Weber on the bench with Aaron Smith starting.

Elsewhere, the front row looks solid with Moli being rested as expected after an 80-minute shift v Canada. Coles could cause some real havoc with fresh legs off the bench. Whitelock is captain in the absence of Read, giving Ardie a gallop at 8, while the rebuilt Brodie Retallick is also back on deck. I expect he'll be off around the HT mark for Tuipulotu.
The A-team mid-field and wings are back, while some chancer called Smith has the unenviable task of filling in for the best fullback in World Rugby.

1. Joe Moody (42)
2. Codie Taylor (47)
3. Nepo Laulala (22)
4. Brodie Retallick (77)
5. Samuel Whitelock - captain (114)
6. Shannon Frizell (7)
7. Sam Cane (64)
8. Ardie Savea (41)
9. Aaron Smith (88)
10. Jordie Barrett (13)
11. George Bridge (6)
12. Anton Lienert-Brown (39)
13. Jack Goodhue (10)
14. Sevu Reece (4)
15. Ben Smith (82)

16. Dane Coles (65)
17. Ofa Tuungafasi (32)
18. Angus Ta'avao (10)
19. Patrick Tuipulotu (27)
20. Matt Todd (22)
21. Brad Weber (3)
22. T J Perenara (61)
23. Rieko Ioane (27)
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Mikey Brown
Posts: 11694
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Mikey Brown »

I'm deeply, deeply suspicious of anybody who plays both wing and fly-half. Fly-half and fullback? Sure. Wing and fullback? Why not. Wing and fly-half? No thank you.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 15521
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Mellsblue »

Wing, fly half and fullback. If I were the NZ PM I’d pass a law to force Mr and Mrs Barrett to reproduce until no longer able. I’d then setup some wired dystopian laboratory where Barrett’s would be produced as an when the national team required them. MP will be able to furnish you with the scientific minutiae if you wish.
paddy no 11
Posts: 1446
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by paddy no 11 »

Bizzarely I have only 1 all black player in my time for this trouncing :x Bon chance Mr. Bridge
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 4048
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Lizard »

Mikey Brown wrote:I'm deeply, deeply suspicious of anybody who plays both wing and fly-half. Fly-half and fullback? Sure. Wing and fullback? Why not. Wing and fly-half? No thank you.
I’m trying to think of another player who has started tests at both W and FB.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 4048
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Lizard »

Lizard wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:I'm deeply, deeply suspicious of anybody who plays both wing and fly-half. Fly-half and fullback? Sure. Wing and fullback? Why not. Wing and fly-half? No thank you.
I’m trying to think of another player who has started tests at both W and FB.
Of course - Colin Slade! 5 starts at FH, 1 each at FB and W, plus 14 runs off the bench all across the backline.

It might be going slightly too far to say Colin Slade is the model for J Barrett, though.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Mikey Brown
Posts: 11694
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Mikey Brown »

Lizard wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:I'm deeply, deeply suspicious of anybody who plays both wing and fly-half. Fly-half and fullback? Sure. Wing and fullback? Why not. Wing and fly-half? No thank you.
I’m trying to think of another player who has started tests at both W and FB.
Do you mean wing, fullback and flyhalf??? AKA the Devil’s Triangle
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5629
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Stom »

Mikey Brown wrote:
Lizard wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:I'm deeply, deeply suspicious of anybody who plays both wing and fly-half. Fly-half and fullback? Sure. Wing and fullback? Why not. Wing and fly-half? No thank you.
I’m trying to think of another player who has started tests at both W and FB.
Do you mean wing, fullback and flyhalf??? AKA the Devil’s Triangle
Did Healey ever play FH for England? As he played SH, wing and FB.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17048
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Puja »

Stom wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:
Lizard wrote: I’m trying to think of another player who has started tests at both W and FB.
Do you mean wing, fullback and flyhalf??? AKA the Devil’s Triangle
Did Healey ever play FH for England? As he played SH, wing and FB.
He did on a couple of occasions. Even played centre for England once. I don't think he ever played full-back though?

If we're going for the lowest score on Pointless, I would note that Lewsey also played fly-half, wing, and fullback for England, as did Catt although the latter was only a wing off the bench. Wilkinson as well played wing and fly-half.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5629
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Stom »

Puja wrote:
Stom wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:
Do you mean wing, fullback and flyhalf??? AKA the Devil’s Triangle
Did Healey ever play FH for England? As he played SH, wing and FB.
He did on a couple of occasions. Even played centre for England once. I don't think he ever played full-back though?

If we're going for the lowest score on Pointless, I would note that Lewsey also played fly-half, wing, and fullback for England, as did Catt although the latter was only a wing off the bench. Wilkinson as well played wing and fly-half.

Puja
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/rugby_u ... 889746.stm
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17048
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Puja »

Stom wrote:
Puja wrote:
Stom wrote:
Did Healey ever play FH for England? As he played SH, wing and FB.
He did on a couple of occasions. Even played centre for England once. I don't think he ever played full-back though?

If we're going for the lowest score on Pointless, I would note that Lewsey also played fly-half, wing, and fullback for England, as did Catt although the latter was only a wing off the bench. Wilkinson as well played wing and fly-half.

Puja
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/rugby_u ... 889746.stm
Good knowledge. I clearly wiped that game from my memory. And here he is at 10: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sport/rugby_union/795285.stm

Puja
Backist Monk
Cameo
Posts: 2726
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Cameo »

Lizard wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:I'm deeply, deeply suspicious of anybody who plays both wing and fly-half. Fly-half and fullback? Sure. Wing and fullback? Why not. Wing and fly-half? No thank you.
I’m trying to think of another player who has started tests at both W and FB.
Chris Patterson must have had at least ten starts in each I would think
User avatar
Spy
Posts: 528
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:58 pm

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Spy »

Namibia looking pretty tidy so far.
User avatar
Spy
Posts: 528
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:58 pm

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Spy »

Got to be so careful with tackle technique. Could decide this WC.
Digby
Posts: 15261
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Digby »

Good win for NZ, made like hard for themselves by refusing to kick (and not really having any tactical kicking at 9, 10 or 15), but easy enough in the end bar some swinging arms. Whitelock remains class
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 4048
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Lizard »

There’s a bit of concern here about it taking so long for us to assert control, but I don’t think many people realised how much the AB’s limited themselves in the first half. Not much kicking, v low numbers into the tackle and ruck, not much off-loading, as well as a rookie 10.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Digby
Posts: 15261
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: All Blacks v Namibia: Pick a Barrett, any Barrett

Post by Digby »

Lizard wrote:There’s a bit of concern here about it taking so long for us to assert control, but I don’t think many people realised how much the AB’s limited themselves in the first half. Not much kicking, v low numbers into the tackle and ruck, not much off-loading, as well as a rookie 10.
You could basically apply the same comment to the semi-final, bar you did make a few offloads. NZ tried to show they'd adapted to take on England by picking a lock at 6, and we feel your pain on that selection, but the actual tactics on Saturday were to go out and play, play and play and don't deviate from the plan even when it's not working. I think they'll also be cross that BB was a problem at 10 when he didn't make the passes when they were on under pressure from the Lions, so they come up with a dual 10 system and end up with Tuilagi being so influential shutting down the passing options into wider midfield, the talk was Mo'unga was the man who would make the pass even if under pressure.
Post Reply