Gloucester Vs Tigers - PRC Final
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 8260
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Gloucester Vs Tigers - PRC Final
Team News
15. Lloyd Evans
14. Alex Hearle
13. Max Llewellyn
12. Seb Atkinson*
11. Ollie Thorley*
10. George Barton*
9. Caolan Englefield
1. Val Rapava-Ruskin
2. George McGuigan
3. Kirill Gotovtsev
4. Freddie Clarke*
5. Cam Jordan*
6. Ruan Ackermann
7. Lewis Ludlow* (C)
8. Zach Mercer
Replacements
16. Seb Blake*
17. Harry Elrington
18. Jamal Ford-Robinson
19. Arthur Clark*
20. Jack Clement*
21. Charlie Chapman*
22. Louis Hillman-Cooper*
23. Josh Hathaway*
STARTING XV
15 Mike Brown [22]
14 Josh Bassett [12]
13 Matt Scott [75]
12 Dan Kelly [75]
11 Ollie Hassell-Collins [14]
10 Handré Pollard [26]
9 Tom Whiteley [23]
1 Francois van Wyk [47]
2 Finn Theobald-Thomas [8]
3 Joe Heyes [137]
4 Harry Wells [191]
5 Sam Carter [14]
6 Hanro Liebenberg [100]
7 Matt Rogerson [16]
8 Kyle Hatherell [15]
REPLACEMENTS
16 Archie Vanes [12]
17 James Whitcombe [47]
18 Dan Richardson [16]
19 Olly Cracknell [35]
20 Emeka Ilione [19]
21 Sam Edwards [12]
22 Jamie Shillcock [20]
23 Phil Cokanasiga [12]
15. Lloyd Evans
14. Alex Hearle
13. Max Llewellyn
12. Seb Atkinson*
11. Ollie Thorley*
10. George Barton*
9. Caolan Englefield
1. Val Rapava-Ruskin
2. George McGuigan
3. Kirill Gotovtsev
4. Freddie Clarke*
5. Cam Jordan*
6. Ruan Ackermann
7. Lewis Ludlow* (C)
8. Zach Mercer
Replacements
16. Seb Blake*
17. Harry Elrington
18. Jamal Ford-Robinson
19. Arthur Clark*
20. Jack Clement*
21. Charlie Chapman*
22. Louis Hillman-Cooper*
23. Josh Hathaway*
STARTING XV
15 Mike Brown [22]
14 Josh Bassett [12]
13 Matt Scott [75]
12 Dan Kelly [75]
11 Ollie Hassell-Collins [14]
10 Handré Pollard [26]
9 Tom Whiteley [23]
1 Francois van Wyk [47]
2 Finn Theobald-Thomas [8]
3 Joe Heyes [137]
4 Harry Wells [191]
5 Sam Carter [14]
6 Hanro Liebenberg [100]
7 Matt Rogerson [16]
8 Kyle Hatherell [15]
REPLACEMENTS
16 Archie Vanes [12]
17 James Whitcombe [47]
18 Dan Richardson [16]
19 Olly Cracknell [35]
20 Emeka Ilione [19]
21 Sam Edwards [12]
22 Jamie Shillcock [20]
23 Phil Cokanasiga [12]
-
- Posts: 8260
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Gloucester Vs Tigers - PRC Final
Both sides going pretty much as strong as the can. Disappointing for Tigers there's no returning JvP or Porter. Heyes being released is a huge boost.
-
- Posts: 18998
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
-
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Gloucester Vs Tigers - PRC Final
Finally!!!! A thread featuring two world class 12’s
-
- Posts: 18998
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
-
- Posts: 8260
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Gloucester Vs Tigers - PRC Final
Depends how bad his setback is. He was supposed to be back around now. I believe he's back running but just have to keep fingers crossed. Tigers could very much use him and I'm sure SB would like him as the bench option behind Mitchell.
-
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Gloucester Vs Tigers - PRC Final
Charlie Atkinson can’t catch a break
-
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm
Re: Gloucester Vs Tigers - PRC Final
Get peak Manu running at him, stat
- ilovelamp
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2016 8:54 am
Re: Gloucester Vs Tigers - PRC Final
He’s not eligible to play.
-
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm
Re: Gloucester Vs Tigers - PRC Final
I didn't specify when.
-
- Posts: 8260
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Gloucester Vs Tigers - PRC Final
He meant Charlie Atkinson. To play in the semi/final you have to have represented the club at the group stages hence why the likes of Weise and Montoya aren't available for Tigers.
- ilovelamp
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2016 8:54 am
Re: Gloucester Vs Tigers - PRC Final
I’m an idiot for missing the Sunak at 10 joke…..
That picture makes me want to go and support Bath now.
That picture makes me want to go and support Bath now.
-
- Posts: 8260
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
-
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
-
- Posts: 8260
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
-
- Posts: 8260
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Gloucester Vs Tigers - PRC Final
A game short on quality and with some of the worst camera work I've ever seen.
-
- Posts: 8260
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Gloucester Vs Tigers - PRC Final
Glaws walking away with it in the second half.
Seb Atkinson has been very good, Mercer has been thoroughly ineffective.
Tigers to a man have been shite. Nowt above 5/10 on show.
Seb Atkinson has been very good, Mercer has been thoroughly ineffective.
Tigers to a man have been shite. Nowt above 5/10 on show.
-
- Posts: 8260
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Gloucester Vs Tigers - PRC Final
Tigers turn it on for the last 15ish mins to make it a mildly interesting finish to the game. The introduction of Ilione added a lot to the Tigers pack, it was unlucky that he being tackled into touch pretty much ended Tigers hopes of getting back into it. The tackle was from Thorley who was very good, particularly in defence.
I really hope the referee is not allowed near the Prem anytime soon. I've heard Liebenburg talk to the ref more tonight than I've heard in the last four years, he was not impressed. I suspect the Glaws fans will be more than slightly mystified as to the nature of Cam Jordan's yellow card as well. Ludlow looked about as impressed at that point as Liebenburg for most of the second half.
I really hope the referee is not allowed near the Prem anytime soon. I've heard Liebenburg talk to the ref more tonight than I've heard in the last four years, he was not impressed. I suspect the Glaws fans will be more than slightly mystified as to the nature of Cam Jordan's yellow card as well. Ludlow looked about as impressed at that point as Liebenburg for most of the second half.
-
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
-
- Posts: 510
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:58 am
- Puja
- Posts: 17537
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Gloucester Vs Tigers - PRC Final
The camerawork was utterly bizarre, wasn't it? Basic rules of broadcasting rugby - 80% of the general play should be from the high camera that pivots to follow play. The only other angle you need in general play is a close-up on a ruck. Everything else is for special occasions or replays. And yet they seemed determined to have the majority of the play shown through a weird low camera that couldn't pivot enough to follow the ball into the 22. I'd've said it made it nigh unwatchable if it wasn't for the rugby being unwatchable whichever angle was shown.
Puja
Backist Monk