This has been a very poor period for us. To be that ill disciplined isn’t good enough. Wales aren’t asking difficult questions, we’re just not good enough here.
Stom wrote: ↑Sat Feb 07, 2026 6:03 pm
The one criticism I’ve consistently had of Mitchell is that he’s a terrible tackler.
It's fairly low on what you need from your 9, as long as they aren't doing a matador impersonation I'm good with it. Just be a speed bump but make sure you've got all the basics nailed.
Stom wrote: ↑Sat Feb 07, 2026 5:59 pm
This has been a very poor period for us. To be that ill disciplined isn’t good enough. Wales aren’t asking difficult questions, we’re just not good enough here.
Yeah, but a really weird game all told. No surprise it's got loose.
Oakboy wrote: ↑Sat Feb 07, 2026 6:35 pm
I hope SB is disappointed. He should be. We should have scored another 30 points at least. It was so often functional rather than daring.
Agreed. Winning in second gear is decent enough, but when points difference may be critical, we really should have destroyed them.
Wanting more points than there are minutes is greedy IMO (obviously would have been nice)
We destroyed them, but have questions to answer on our composure - which can happen when playing against 13 men or when dominating an opponent. Start being a bit selfish, or trying too hard, assuming there's a gap when there isn't...
There was a bit of a lull after half time. With the game pretty much won at that point it's understandable. Conceding the try was the slap to wake us back up and get us back firing.
A nice warm up for the Calcutta Cup but next week we'll need to find another gear.
I know it's a bit of a hobby horse but 6:2 is about maintaining 80 minutes'intensity. Against poor opposition, it failed in that respect. Pollock for 12 minutes, for example, makes little sense. I'm not sure wnat was good to build on and what was poor to be changed. Was the result adequate?