Saints get away with it
Moderator: Puja
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Saints get away with it
Something else which needs to be eradicated from the game is the ball carrier lifting his elbow into the tackle. It happens far too much and it's not surprising that Murray was yet another to come a cropper as a result.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14547
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Saints get away with it
Plenty of interesting stuff here:
Rugby concussions: RFU head of medicine defends HIA process
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/38669294
Rugby concussions: RFU head of medicine defends HIA process
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/38669294
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14547
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Saints get away with it
Sale also get away with it. The review found that the decision not to remove Ioane from the field of play was "a matter of clinical judgement by the team doctor'.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Saints get away with it
I've been chatting in the last couple of days to some folks at various clubs around the west midlands and sod the pro rugby the likely scale of concussions at the junior level are alarming. Over and over there are kids who're taking knocks to the head, with a fair chance of some concussion it would seem, who're simply turning up each weekend no matter they've had maybe a dozen possible concussions in say 24 months, and that before the age of 16.
There's also no certainty there are any medical records, that are either being compiled by clubs, or that are being sent in to the kids' doctors. And then there might be other incidents at school, or other activities which see the kid suffer a concussion that the rugby clubs know nothing about.
There's also no certainty there are any medical records, that are either being compiled by clubs, or that are being sent in to the kids' doctors. And then there might be other incidents at school, or other activities which see the kid suffer a concussion that the rugby clubs know nothing about.
- Puja
- Posts: 17535
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Saints get away with it
Was it just me, or was Parisse completely and unequivocally sparked out today and then allowed to play on?
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9069
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Saints get away with it
Unless I missed one, then just you (well, not me anyway), he maintained muscle tone in his arms / neck / shoulders throughout IMO
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14547
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Saints get away with it
The success, or otherwise, of this will be of interest:
BIBA to introduce head scans following Mike Towell and Nick Blackwell incidents
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/38878500
BIBA to introduce head scans following Mike Towell and Nick Blackwell incidents
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/38878500
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9069
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Saints get away with it
Please note though, the scanners are for intracranial bleeding (a bad thing) not concussion (a different bad thing).
No idea on efficacy, or if it's 3 min for the whole cranium, or 3 min for 1 spot.
No idea on efficacy, or if it's 3 min for the whole cranium, or 3 min for 1 spot.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Saints get away with it
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/38958828
Dunbar with a 4 minute HIA and then develops symptoms post match. Hard to know what to say
Dunbar with a 4 minute HIA and then develops symptoms post match. Hard to know what to say
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Saints get away with it
Not really. HIAs are clearly almost worthless.Digby wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/38958828
Dunbar with a 4 minute HIA and then develops symptoms post match. Hard to know what to say
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Puja
- Posts: 17535
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Saints get away with it
They certainly are when done with a half-arsed approach and the expectation that the player will be going back on unless he can't remember his name. Someone needs to be punished for it or teams will just keep doing it.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Not really. HIAs are clearly almost worthless.Digby wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/38958828
Dunbar with a 4 minute HIA and then develops symptoms post match. Hard to know what to say
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Saints get away with it
Sounds like the BBC report might be based on the match clock, and the match clock wasn't ticking for all of Dunbar's time under HIA, though I'd agree the HIA process is a bit absurd.
Interesting some of the research starting to come out in football now connected to heading the ball.
Interesting some of the research starting to come out in football now connected to heading the ball.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14547
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Saints get away with it
This seems to be getting a lot more coverage at the moment. Not sure whether this is a good or bad thing for rugby going forward.Digby wrote: Interesting some of the research starting to come out in football now connected to heading the ball.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Saints get away with it
I've become convinced that until someone gets sued and loses a lot of money rugby will do nothing of any real consequence. With fucking idiots in the media saying that somehow the game is less manly if you try to reduce the risks of serious brain injury the governing body just gets frightened off.Mellsblue wrote:This seems to be getting a lot more coverage at the moment. Not sure whether this is a good or bad thing for rugby going forward.Digby wrote: Interesting some of the research starting to come out in football now connected to heading the ball.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9069
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Saints get away with it
Well, with the Saints case, many of us said that finding them guilty, but not punshing them just sets precedent and would open the flood gates - looks like we may have been right.
I have to agree with you Eug. that nothing seems likely to change without a big court case. Rugby has had the chance to change itself - and it talked the talk, and fell at the first hurdle of actually doing something. I actually now hope that the Sale SH case succeeds.
FTR, this is not anti-Saints, or anti-Sale, or anti-Wales or anything else; the individual club involved are a case of "there but for the grace of gods, go my team"
I have to agree with you Eug. that nothing seems likely to change without a big court case. Rugby has had the chance to change itself - and it talked the talk, and fell at the first hurdle of actually doing something. I actually now hope that the Sale SH case succeeds.
FTR, this is not anti-Saints, or anti-Sale, or anti-Wales or anything else; the individual club involved are a case of "there but for the grace of gods, go my team"
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6317
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Saints get away with it
Just from a legal point of view, is the nature of the game an issue or is it 'just' negligence in applying a protocol?Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I've become convinced that until someone gets sued and loses a lot of money rugby will do nothing of any real consequence. With fucking idiots in the media saying that somehow the game is less manly if you try to reduce the risks of serious brain injury the governing body just gets frightened off.Mellsblue wrote:This seems to be getting a lot more coverage at the moment. Not sure whether this is a good or bad thing for rugby going forward.Digby wrote: Interesting some of the research starting to come out in football now connected to heading the ball.
-
- Posts: 18991
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Saints get away with it
What's the situation with respect to serious brain injury in Rugby anyway- how many historically, and is it a growing trend? Are we seeing the same thing (albeit smaller) as in grid iron?
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14547
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Saints get away with it
Some chap in Scotland has undertaken an invasive study on the brains of deceased ex-rugby players. His findings ain't pretty.
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: Saints get away with it
Negligence. It's old farts living their lives vicariously through their players. More specifically it's touchline staff trying to relive their glory days.Oakboy wrote:Just from a legal point of view, is the nature of the game an issue or is it 'just' negligence in applying a protocol?Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I've become convinced that until someone gets sued and loses a lot of money rugby will do nothing of any real consequence. With fucking idiots in the media saying that somehow the game is less manly if you try to reduce the risks of serious brain injury the governing body just gets frightened off.Mellsblue wrote: This seems to be getting a lot more coverage at the moment. Not sure whether this is a good or bad thing for rugby going forward.
Last edited by kk67 on Thu Feb 16, 2017 5:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Saints get away with it
(hello again stranger)Banquo wrote:What's the situation with respect to serious brain injury in Rugby anyway- how many historically, and is it a growing trend? Are we seeing the same thing (albeit smaller) as in grid iron?
I'm not sure that a definitive study has been done yet but I would be very surprised if we didn't have the same problem.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 18991
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Saints get away with it
Hi there; I do think its different issue in grid-iron, but purely based on the anecdotal stuff about the helmets both promoting madder headlong charges and a greater concussive effect. Need to get those studies done to figure what if any radical intervention is needed, in parallel to promoting safer behaviour and good tackling technique.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:(hello again stranger)Banquo wrote:What's the situation with respect to serious brain injury in Rugby anyway- how many historically, and is it a growing trend? Are we seeing the same thing (albeit smaller) as in grid iron?
I'm not sure that a definitive study has been done yet but I would be very surprised if we didn't have the same problem.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Saints get away with it
I'd agree with almost all that. Gridiron had a particular problem with people deliberately their helmeted heads as a weapon, but I don't think that it's a wholly different issue but rather a question of degree.Banquo wrote:Hi there; I do think its different issue in grid-iron, but purely based on the anecdotal stuff about the helmets both promoting madder headlong charges and a greater concussive effect. Need to get those studies done to figure what if any radical intervention is needed, in parallel to promoting safer behaviour and good tackling technique.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:(hello again stranger)Banquo wrote:What's the situation with respect to serious brain injury in Rugby anyway- how many historically, and is it a growing trend? Are we seeing the same thing (albeit smaller) as in grid iron?
I'm not sure that a definitive study has been done yet but I would be very surprised if we didn't have the same problem.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: Saints get away with it
I'm pretty sure I've seen that it isn't the odd helmet torpedo style assault that is the biggest issue, it's the repetitive smaller impacts that Linemen suffer at every snap that causes the most serious damage.Banquo wrote:Hi there; I do think its different issue in grid-iron, but purely based on the anecdotal stuff about the helmets both promoting madder headlong charges and a greater concussive effect. Need to get those studies done to figure what if any radical intervention is needed, in parallel to promoting safer behaviour and good tackling technique.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:(hello again stranger)Banquo wrote:What's the situation with respect to serious brain injury in Rugby anyway- how many historically, and is it a growing trend? Are we seeing the same thing (albeit smaller) as in grid iron?
I'm not sure that a definitive study has been done yet but I would be very surprised if we didn't have the same problem.
-
- Posts: 18991
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Saints get away with it
ah ok, what about the 'helmet' effect, as it were?16th man wrote:I'm pretty sure I've seen that it isn't the odd helmet torpedo style assault that is the biggest issue, it's the repetitive smaller impacts that Linemen suffer at every snap that causes the most serious damage.Banquo wrote:Hi there; I do think its different issue in grid-iron, but purely based on the anecdotal stuff about the helmets both promoting madder headlong charges and a greater concussive effect. Need to get those studies done to figure what if any radical intervention is needed, in parallel to promoting safer behaviour and good tackling technique.Eugene Wrayburn wrote: (hello again stranger)
I'm not sure that a definitive study has been done yet but I would be very surprised if we didn't have the same problem.
-
- Posts: 18991
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Saints get away with it
Yep get that, persistent and prolonged 'head banging' I suppose.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I'd agree with almost all that. Gridiron had a particular problem with people deliberately their helmeted heads as a weapon, but I don't think that it's a wholly different issue but rather a question of degree.Banquo wrote:Hi there; I do think its different issue in grid-iron, but purely based on the anecdotal stuff about the helmets both promoting madder headlong charges and a greater concussive effect. Need to get those studies done to figure what if any radical intervention is needed, in parallel to promoting safer behaviour and good tackling technique.Eugene Wrayburn wrote: (hello again stranger)
I'm not sure that a definitive study has been done yet but I would be very surprised if we didn't have the same problem.